INTRODUCTION: Hydatidiform mole (HM) is an abnormal gestation characterized by significant hydropic enlargement, trophoblastic proliferation and atypia involving part or all of the chorionic villi. The diagnosis and classification of hydatidiform moles is subject to great inter-observer variability due to significant morphologic overlaps. This study aims to evaluate the utility of p57KIP2 immunohistochemistry and ploidy by Her-2 FISH in refining the diagnosis of molar tissues.

METHOD: 113 and 78 molar cases were retrieved from the archives of the Histopathology Section of the Philippine General Hospital and Pathology Department of Seoul National University Hospital, respectively. TMA sections were submitted for immunohistochemical analysis for p57KIP2. Ploidy was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization using Her-2 probe. An interrater reliability analysis was done using the Kappa statistics with 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS: All 68 (100%) cases diagnosed as CH were negative for p57KIP2 staining and are diploid. Among the 54 cases of PH, only 1 (2%) is positive for p57KIP2 and is diploid. The interrater reliability between p57KIP2 and Her-2 FISH ploidy results is 0.66 (p <.0.001), 95% CI (0.02, 1.00) which is considered "fair to good." The kappa value between review diagnosis and p57KIP2 is 0.024 while the kappa between review diagnosis and Her-2 FISH ploidy is 0.050 both signifying poor agreement beyond chance.

CONCLUSION: Morphologic assessment alone may not be sufficient in problematic cases. p57KIP2 in conjunction with by Her-2 FISH are good adjuncts in the diagnosis and classification of hydatidiform mole.

Human ; Male ; Female ; Pregnancy ; Chorionic Villi ; Immunohistochemistry ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Diploidy ; Reproducibility Of Results ; Hydatidiform Mole ; Trophoblasts ; Ploidies ; Molar

OBJECTIVE

There is a mandatory intradepartmental peer review algorithm in the University of the Philippines - Philippine General Hospital (UP-PGH) Department of Laboratories wherein specific cases are required to be reviewed by another pathologist before the release of results. The main objective of this study was to determine the rate of diagnostic change in surgical pathology reports after undergoing the said review.

METHODS

All surgical pathology cases which underwent the review from 2015 to 2018 were retrieved from the records of the Section of Surgical Pathology. The cases were classified as concordant or discordant. A case was considered concordant if the reviewing pathologist had agreed with the primary pathologist’s diagnosis. A case was considered discordant if the reviewing pathologist had disagreed with the primary pathologist’s diagnosis.

RESULTS

Out of 5,377 cases included in this study, there were 5,209 concordant cases and 168 discordant cases, with the rate of discordance computed to be 3.1%. Out of the 168 discordant cases, 107 were revised for diagnostic change. Rate of diagnostic change was computed to be 2.0% (107 out of 5,377 cases for review). The most common criterion satisfied for meriting a mandatory review is being under the category of biopsies or cytology cases with malignant or borderline diagnoses (49.4%). The most common category of diagnostic change is change in immunohistochemistry recommendations (24.3%). Most of the discordant cases and cases revised for diagnostic change fall under the categories of gastrointestinal, gynecology, and head & neck pathology.

CONCLUSION

The low rate of diagnostic change in our institution might be attributed to good diagnostic accuracy. However, it is also possible that reviewing pathologists tended to agree with the diagnosis made by their colleagues because of the element of peer pressure. Data from the study may imply that special courses/ lectures or institutional standard practice guidelines on interpreting biopsy and cytology cases as well as on the utility of immunohistochemistry studies, especially those focused on gastrointestinal, gynecology, and head & neck pathology are needed by the pathologists and the doctors training to become pathologists in our institution.

Review ; Pathology, Surgical

Objectives: To evaluate abnormal Papanicolau smear results at the Philippine General Hospital (PGH) for the past four years by comparing abnormal smear cytology with histologic interpretations. Possible causes of discrepant results were also determined.

Methods: All Pap smears released as abnormal from January 2014 to December 2017 and the corresponding available biopsies were retrieved. Discrepancy between cytologic and histology diagnosis was assessed and pairs with major discordance were reviewed.

Results: There were a total of 30,237 conventional pap smears signed out of which 239 (0.79%) were abnormal and only 56 (23%) had a subsequent tissue biopsy. The overall concordance rate is 75% while strict or absolute concordance rate is 32%. The overall discordance rate is 25%. Positive predictive value is highest for pap smears signed out as atypical glandular cells favor neoplastic (AGC-NEO) (100%), followed by malignant (93%), high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (83%), and then atypical squamous cells cannot exclude an HSIL (ASC-H) and atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASCUS), both at 67%.

Conclusions: Considering that the Philippine General Hospital is a referral and academic center, we have a low percentage of abnormal pap smears compared to other developing countries and even a lower percentage of patients who had subsequent biopsies. Cytohistologic correlation detected interpretative as well as sampling errors, and the aim is to work on these deficiencies by improving quality assurance protocols and modifying current local practices of both pathologists and clinicians.

Human

Background and Objective: Epidemiological studies have shown that Filipinos have a higher prevalence of welldifferentiated thyroid cancer and a higher rate of recurrence. The BRAF V600E mutation has been proposed as a potential prognostic marker in aggressive papillary thyroid cancers. In this study, we determined whether this mutation is a risk factor for tumor recurrence in papillary thyroid cancer among Filipinos. Methods: We conducted an age and sex-matched case-control study of patients with papillary thyroid cancer; we had two groups – with and without tumor recurrence – of 14 patients each, with at least a 5-year follow-up. We extracted the DNA samples from the patients’ (paraffin-embedded) tumor biopsy tissue blocks from thyroidectomy specimens, then detected the BRAF V600E mutation using polymerase chain reaction. The McNemar’s test for difference of proportions in paired data was used to determine the association of BRAF V600E mutation with recurrence. Results: The BRAF V600E mutation was found in 57.14% of all cases. We found a prevalence of 64.29% among those with recurrence and 50.00% among those without recurrence, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.688). Conclusion Our study showed the BRAF V600E mutation was not associated with recurrence. We encountered several limitations: we had limited data regarding molecular methodologies in the Philippine setting, we had a small sample size, and therefore we could not study other parameters (e.g., tumor characteristics, lymph node metastasis, stage of disease). We hope that this paves the way for future studies and collaborations to establish the role of BRAF V600E in Filipinos with papillary thyroid tumor recurrence.
papillary thyroid cancer ; molecular diagnostics ; tumor recurrence