BACKGROUND: Ultrasound?guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a regional anesthetic technique which can provide post-op pain control for pediatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery. We hypothesized that the quadratus lumborum block would be as efficacious as a caudal block in providing pain control.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the postoperative analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided QLB versus ultrasound-guided caudal block among 1-6 years old children undergoing lower abdominal and urological surgeries in Philippine Children's Medical Center.

METHODS: This is a single-blinded randomized control trial. 50 patients enrolled aged between 1 and 6 years. The patients were randomly classified into the caudal block group and quadratus lumborum block group. The primary outcome is the need for analgesia during the first 24 hours.

RESULTS: A significant difference in the proportion of patients who requested for rescue analgesia was observed with caudal block having more patients in need of analgesic (100% CB vs 48% QLB, p<0.001). No postoperative complication was observed.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The quadratus lumborum block was more effective in reducing the postoperative pain management during the initial 48 hours. Quadratus lumborum block is recommended for future pediatric procedures requiring postoperative pain control, safety, practicality and economy.

Human ; Male ; Female ; Pre-adolescent (a Child 6-12 Years Of Age) ; Child Preschool (a Child Between The Ages Of 2 And 5) ; Analgesia ; Pain, Postoperative ; Diagnostic Imaging

Objective. The present study aims to correlate the LGU list of PhilHealth Sponsored Members in a municipality of Batangas with the list of poor residents as identified by the Participatory Action Research (PAR) methodology. Method. Interview of key informants documented the processes utilized by the LGU in determining PhilHealth beneficiaries for the Sponsored Program and the Participatory Action Research (PAR) survey in the classification of households into poor, middle and rich in four barangays of the municipality. The list of LGU Sponsored members was then cross matched with the PAR household classification. Results. The comparison of the LGU list of Sponsored members and the household classification by the PAR survey showed a wide discrepancy: (1) 464 "Not Found" Sponsored households or 70% of the LGU's Sponsored list; (2) inclusion of the non-poor: 140 middle class families as classified by the PAR survey or 21.1% of the LGU's Sponsored list; and (3) exclusion of 413 or 87.5% of true poor families identified by the PAR Survey. Only 59 families or 8.9% of the LGU Sponsored list were classified as poor families by PAR. Conclusion. PAR offers communities, LGUs and the National Health Insurance Program a tool to validate the coverage of the Sponsored program. LGUs and the PhilHealth should consider such tool or similar tools to validate their identification, selection and enrollment of the poor, which is extremely vital in achieving universal coverage. Given the right tool, communities are in the best position to identify the poor for the Sponsored program. By way of collaboration with the underprivileged themselves, the academe has a role in assisting communities in acquiring collective awareness of their own situation and developing capacity for improving their lives. The academe also has a role in assisting LGUs in improving their health systems and national health programs in validating and improving their implementation. Further studies should be done to investigate the following: the identity of the "not found" SP members; the utilization of PhilHealth benefits by the poor; and the prospect of utilizing the PAR method by other non-academic institutions in monitoring the progress of community programs.
Human ; Male ; Female ; PUBLIC-PRIVATE SECTOR PARTNERSHIPS ; HEALTH SERVICES ; INSURANCE, HEALTH ; HEALTH CARE ECONOMICS AND ORGANIZATIONS ; ECONOMICS ; FINANCING, ORGANIZED ; INSURANCE

BACKGROUND: The Clinic for the Therapy Services (CTS) has considered reverting to face-to-face service delivery due to the downward trend in COVID-19 cases in the Philippines. However, the clinic has yet to investigate the willingness of the clients to this mode as a basis for its effective implementation. OBJECTIVES: The study described the readiness of CTS clients in returning to face-to-face therapy amidst the pandemic. It also discussed the factors affecting readiness based on a survey. METHODOLOGY: Fifty-five screened survey responses on the readiness of clients in returning to face-to-face therapy were gathered from January 30 to February 28, 2021. These underwent retrospective data analysis. Eight prospective online key informant interviews were conducted for clarifications in May 2022. This study utilized a descriptive analysis of quantitative categorical variables and a thematic content analysis of qualitative data. RESULTS: The majority of the respondents (35) stated readiness to attend face-to-face therapy followed by those who answered “No” (11), “Maybe” (5), and others (4). Factors that may have affected readiness included travel, characteristics of face-to-face therapy, health conditions, vaccine, and COVID-19 concerns. Frequently preferred health and safety strategies were the provision of hygiene products, disinfection, limited people inside the clinic, separate therapy areas, and ventilation. CONCLUSION Most of the respondents expressed willingness to receive face-to-face therapy in April or May of 2021. Feasibility of travel and decreased number of COVID-19 cases may have encouraged willingness to attend. Those who were hesitant reported concerns with traveling, characteristics of face-to-face therapy, health conditions, the COVID-19 situation, and the vaccine.
rehabilitation ; COVID-19