1.Comparison of Congenital Rubella Syndrome Cases at a Philippine Tertiary Hospital from 2009-2012 to 2019-2022
Melissa Anne S. Gonzales ; Alvina Pauline D. Santiago ; Roland Joseph D. Tan
Acta Medica Philippina 2024;58(6):58-63
Background and Objective:
The Philippines does not have a national congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) surveillance or registry. Regular monitoring of CRS cases in hospitals, including in a Philippine tertiary hospital, helped in the past to provide clinico-epidemiologic data on CRS. This study aimed to continue providing clinico-epidemiologic data on CRS cases seen in the Philippine tertiary hospital from 2009-2012 and 2019-2022 and compare the cases seen from said timelines.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was used, employing chart review of patients newly diagnosed with CRS from 2009-2012 and 2019-2022 in the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the Philippine tertiary hospital.
Results:
Forty-two patients newly diagnosed with CRS from 2009-2012 and 2019-2022 were included. Only 14
(33%) were serologically-confirmed cases (albeit qualitatively). Median age (first and third interquartile ranges) at
consult was 1 year (0.4, 2.5). Twenty-four (57%) patients had maternal history of rashes and/or fever. Trimester of pregnancy when mother became symptomatic was not significantly correlated with chief complaint (p=0.20) and numbers of ophthalmic (p=0.68) and systemic manifestations (p=0.32). Cataract was the most common ophthalmic manifestation present in 40 (95%) patients. Twenty-six (62%) patients had other associated systemic findings of which hearing loss was the most common. Only 29 of 40 patients with cataract underwent lensectomy, with 23 patients having poor visual prognosis prior to surgery (5 with nystagmus alone, 10 with nystagmus and strabismus, and 8 with strabismus alone).
Discussion:
Using ophthalmic manifestations as primary indicator, this study provided an update on the CRS cases in the country. Laboratory confirmation remains a challenge in diagnosing CRS as the tests are costly and not widely available. There was increase from 2009-2012 compared to 2019-2022 in number of patients who underwent surgical treatment for cataract but visual outcomes were suboptimal due to delay in consultation. Although there was a decrease in number of CRS cases seen in the Philippine tertiary hospital, this cannot be attributed to increased rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) coverage alone.
Conclusion
Provision of data from individual hospital-based studies similar to this highlights the need for a national CRS surveillance system or registry. This can better gauge the burden of CRS and identify the gap in RCV coverage.
Rubella Syndrome, Congenital
;
Retinitis Pigmentosa
2.A comparison of retinoblastoma cases in the Philippines
Roland Joseph D. Tan ; Gary John V. Mercado ; Patricia E. Cabrera ; Paulita Pamela P. Astudillo ; Rolando Enrique D. Domingo ; Josept Mari S. Poblete ; Charmaine Grace M. Cabebe ; Adriel Vincent R. Te ; Melissa Anne S. Gonzales ; Jocelyn G. Sy ; Beltran Alexis A. Aclan ; Jayson T. So ; Fatima G. Regala ; Kimberley Amanda K. Comia ; Josemaria M. Castro ; Mara Augustine S. Galang ; Aldous Dominic C. Cabanlas ; Benedicto Juan E. Aguilar ; Gabrielle S. Evangelista ; John Michael Maniwan ; Andrei P. Martin ; Calvin Y. Martinez ; John Alfred A. Lim ; Rena Ivy Bascuna ; Rachel M. Ng ; Kevin B. Agsaoay ; Kris Zana A. Arao ; Ellaine Rose V. Apostol ; Beatriz M. Prieto
Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology 2024;49(2):106-114
OBJECTIVE
This study compared the demographics, clinical profile, treatment, and outcomes of retinoblastoma patients seen at medical institutions in the Philippines between two time periods: 2010 to 2015 and 2016 to 2020.
METHODSThis was a multicenter, analytical, cohort study using review of medical charts and databases of retinoblastoma patients seen in 11 medical institutions from 2010 to 2020.
RESULTSThere were 636 patients (821 eyes) included in this study: 330 patients were seen in 2010 to 2015 while 306 in 2016 to 2020. More cases per annum were seen in the latter timeline. The number of patients with unilateral disease was not significantly different between the two time periods (p=0.51). Age at onset of symptom, age at initial consultation, and delay in consult were also not significantly different between the two time periods (p > 0.05). Patients had significantly different distributions of intraocular grades (p < 0.0001) and systemic staging (p < 0.0001) between the two time periods. Enucleation was the most common surgical treatment performed in both timelines. There was significant difference in the status of patients based on the need for systemic chemotherapy (p < 0.01). There was significant difference in outcome between the two time periods, including the proportions of living and deceased patients.
CONCLUSIONThis study compared the most comprehensive data on retinoblastoma patients in the country. There was no improvement in early health seeking behavior based on similar age at initial consult and delay in consult. Enucleation remained the most common treatment mode as opposed to chemotherapy due to similar percentage of patients with unilateral disease, an indication for enucleation rather than chemotherapy.
Human ; Retinoblastoma ; Philippines ; Epidemiology ; Treatment ; Therapeutics