1.Genes expression profile analysis of colorectal cancer cells derived from colo205
Changwu YUE ; Xin ZHOU ; Yuhong LV ; Qingliang ZENG ; Yuanyuan LI ; Miao WANG ; Meiyun SHAO
The Journal of Practical Medicine 2014;(13):2052-2054
Objective To obtain differential expression genes from colorectal cancer cells derived from colo205 for further research. Methods RNA from colo205 cells,CD133+cells and CD133-cells were sequenced and analyzed by bioinformatics software. Results One hundred and twenty four differential expression genes were obtained, which involves 32 metabolic pathways. Conclusions Large quantities of differential genes can be found among different groups of cells derived from colo205 cells , which can provide epigenetic evidence for colorectal cancer research.
2.Study on immune status of patients with schistosomiasis japonica in Poyang Lake region Ⅲ Humoral and cellular immune characteristics between Schistosoma ja-ponicum high and low antibody responders
Zhaojun LI ; Min YUAN ; Minjun JI ; Shuying XIE ; Meiyun LV ; Yifeng LI ; Weiming LAN ; Yuemin LIU ; Fei HU ; Xiaojun ZENG ; Jianying LI ; Dandan LIN
Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control 2016;(1):11-17
Objective To explore the immune mechanism of negative results of immune tests of schistosomiasis japonica pa?tients. Methods Totally 142 schistosomiasis patients(positive stool examinations)of Poyang Lake region were tested by ELI?SA method,and the ROC curve was applied to determine the high and low response of the patients. The levels of cellular immu?nity and cytokines of high and low responders were compared. Results Totally eight schistosomiasis patients were found as low responders. Besides SWAP?IgA(t= -1.588,P > 0.1),the levels of isotype antibodies were significantly lower in the low re?sponders compared with those in the high responders(t = -14.517 to -2.866,all P < 0.05). In the low responders,the propor?tion of CD3+T was increased;and the proportions of CD4+T,CD8+T,CD4+CD25+Treg,and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ were all de?creased,but all of them were not significant(t = -1.72 to 0.974,all P > 0.05)compared with those in the high responders. The differences of IFN?γ and IL?10 between the high and low responders were both not significant(t= -2.426 to 0.216,all P >0.05). Conclusions There is a significant difference between the high and low responders only in the levels of isotype antibod?ies. One of the reasons of low response in the immune tests is the much lower antibody level after the antigen?antibody compound is completely formulated.