Objective To explore the care burden and its influencing factors of primary caregiver of patients with spinal cord injury. Methods A total of 120 primary caregiver of spinal cord injury patients were selected as research object. The general information of SCI patients and their primary caregiver were investigated by SCI patient general data questionnaire and primary caregiver in SCI patient general data questionnaire, caregiver burden of spinal cord injury were investigated bycaregiver burden inventory. The relationship between the general information of patients and caregivers and the care burden analyzed. Results Caregiver burden of elderly patients was significantly lower than that of younger ones (F=54.053,P<0.01). The more serious of spinal cord injury, the higher of care burden (F=315.104,P<0.01). The patients with neck and multiple segmental spine injury and postoperative complications had a higher care burden (F=199.203,t=6.462, 32.195,P<0.01). When the caregivers were female, spouses or children, with poor health condition, with higher education degree, and as cadres or workers, caregiver burden was higher (t=6.061,F=22.073-52.392,P<0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the degree of spinal cord injury, complications, gender, and the relationship between the patients were the main factors that influenced the care burden. Conclusions The main factors influencing the care burden are spinal cord injury degree, complications, gender, and the relationship between the patients. Clinical managers needs to develop appropriate social support system for the factors which affect the caregiver, in order to ease the caregiver′s care burden.

Objective To observe the efficacy of proparacaine hydrochloride in preoperative venipuncture. Methods Two hundred and furty patients hospitalized for preoperative venipuncture, between June 2015 to December 2015 in Jiangmen Central Hospital, were equally randomized into the intervention group and control group: the former was treated with proparacaine hydrochloride and the control group used traditional method. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was adopted to assess the effects of the anesthesia effect. At the same time the one-time success rate of puncturing and the adverse reactions were observed and compared between the two groups. Results Patients of the intervention group felt significantly less painful than that the control one (P<0.05). The successful rate of the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Proparacaine hydrochloride is safe and effective for preoperative which reduces pain.