1.The Factors Affecting Unsafe Behaviors of Iranian Workers: A Qualitative Study Based on Grounded Theory
Mahdi MALAKOUTIKHAH ; Mehdi JAHANGIRI ; Moslem ALIMOHAMMADLOU ; Seyed Aliakbar FAGHIHI ; Mojtaba KAMALINIA
Safety and Health at Work 2021;12(3):339-345
Background:
Some researchers state that they are not yet able to provide a deep understanding of the underlying causes of unsafe behaviors (UBs). Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the attitudes and experiences of Iranian workers of UBs.
Methods:
This present study was conducted in 35 industries using a semistructured interview based on grounded theory. Forty participants were interviewed, including 13 industrial safety and health experts and 27 workers and supervisors. The analysis of the present study consisted of a three-step coding process including open, axial, and selective coding.
Results:
The results showed that the factors affecting UBs could be classified into three categories: organizational, individual, and socioeconomic factors. Organizational factors were divided into 6 parts: procedure and environmental conditions, communications, monitoring, organizational safety culture, resource allocation, and human resources. Socioeconomic factors had three subcategories: community safety culture, type of organizational ownership, and economic problems. Finally, the individual factors were classified into two categories of personality traits and individual competence.
Conclusion
The results showed that organizational factors were the most categorized, and it is estimated that this factor has a more important role in the UBs. Of course, to better understand the close relationship between these factors and find the weight and importance of each factor, it needs to measure it with multicriteria decision systems.
2.The Factors Affecting Unsafe Behaviors of Iranian Workers: A Qualitative Study Based on Grounded Theory
Mahdi MALAKOUTIKHAH ; Mehdi JAHANGIRI ; Moslem ALIMOHAMMADLOU ; Seyed Aliakbar FAGHIHI ; Mojtaba KAMALINIA
Safety and Health at Work 2021;12(3):339-345
Background:
Some researchers state that they are not yet able to provide a deep understanding of the underlying causes of unsafe behaviors (UBs). Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the attitudes and experiences of Iranian workers of UBs.
Methods:
This present study was conducted in 35 industries using a semistructured interview based on grounded theory. Forty participants were interviewed, including 13 industrial safety and health experts and 27 workers and supervisors. The analysis of the present study consisted of a three-step coding process including open, axial, and selective coding.
Results:
The results showed that the factors affecting UBs could be classified into three categories: organizational, individual, and socioeconomic factors. Organizational factors were divided into 6 parts: procedure and environmental conditions, communications, monitoring, organizational safety culture, resource allocation, and human resources. Socioeconomic factors had three subcategories: community safety culture, type of organizational ownership, and economic problems. Finally, the individual factors were classified into two categories of personality traits and individual competence.
Conclusion
The results showed that organizational factors were the most categorized, and it is estimated that this factor has a more important role in the UBs. Of course, to better understand the close relationship between these factors and find the weight and importance of each factor, it needs to measure it with multicriteria decision systems.
3.Needle Stick Injuries and their Related Safety Measures among Nurses in a University Hospital, Shiraz, Iran.
Mehdi JAHANGIRI ; Akbar ROSTAMABADI ; Naser HOBOUBI ; Neda TADAYON ; Ali SOLEIMANI
Safety and Health at Work 2016;7(1):72-77
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and factors related to needle stick injuries (NSIs) and to assess related safety measures among a sample of Iranian nurses. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a random sample of 168 registered active nurses was selected from different wards of one of the hospitals of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS). Data were collected by an anonymous questionnaire and a checklist based observational method among the 168 registered active nurses. RESULTS: The prevalence of NSIs in the total of work experience and the last year was 76% and 54%, respectively. Hollow-bore needles were the most common devices involved in the injuries (85.5%). The majority of NSIs occurred in the morning shift (57.8%) and the most common activity leading to NSIs was recapping needles (41.4%). The rate of underreporting NSIs was 60.2% and the major reasons for not reporting the NSIs were heavy clinical schedule (46.7%) and perception of low risk of infection (37.7%). A statistically significant relationship was found between the occurrence of NSIs and sex, hours worked/week, and frequency of shifts/month. CONCLUSION: The study showed a high prevalence of NSIs among nurses. Supportive measures such as improving injection practices, modification of working schedule, planning training programs targeted at using personal protective equipment, and providing an adequate number of safety facilities such as puncture resistant disposal containers and engineered safe devices are essential for the effective prevention of NSI incidents among the studied nurses.
Anonyms and Pseudonyms
;
Appointments and Schedules
;
Checklist
;
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Education
;
Humans
;
Iran*
;
Needles*
;
Needlestick Injuries*
;
Prevalence
;
Punctures
4.Human Error Analysis in a Permit to Work System: A Case Study in a Chemical Plant.
Mehdi JAHANGIRI ; Naser HOBOUBI ; Akbar ROSTAMABADI ; Sareh KESHAVARZI ; Ali Akbar HOSSEINI
Safety and Health at Work 2016;7(1):6-11
BACKGROUND: A permit to work (PTW) is a formal written system to control certain types of work which are identified as potentially hazardous. However, human error in PTW processes can lead to an accident. METHODS: This cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted to estimate the probability of human errors in PTW processes in a chemical plant in Iran. In the first stage, through interviewing the personnel and studying the procedure in the plant, the PTW process was analyzed using the hierarchical task analysis technique. In doing so, PTW was considered as a goal and detailed tasks to achieve the goal were analyzed. In the next step, the standardized plant analysis risk-human (SPAR-H) reliability analysis method was applied for estimation of human error probability. RESULTS: The mean probability of human error in the PTW system was estimated to be 0.11. The highest probability of human error in the PTW process was related to flammable gas testing (50.7%). CONCLUSION: The SPAR-H method applied in this study could analyze and quantify the potential human errors and extract the required measures for reducing the error probabilities in PTW system. Some suggestions to reduce the likelihood of errors, especially in the field of modifying the performance shaping factors and dependencies among tasks are provided.
Humans*
;
Iran
;
Plants*
5.Validity Assessment of the Persian Version of the Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire (NOSACQ-50): A Case Study in a Steel Company.
Yadolah YOUSEFI ; Mehdi JAHANGIRI ; Alireza CHOOBINEH ; Hamidreza TABATABAEI ; Sareh KESHAVARZI ; Ali SHAMS ; Younes MOHAMMADI
Safety and Health at Work 2016;7(4):326-330
BACKGROUND: The Nordic Safety Climate Questionnaire-50 (NOSACQ-50) was developed by a team of Nordic occupational safety researchers based on safety climate and psychological theories. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Persian version of NOSACQ-50 and assess the score of safety climate on a group of workers in a steel company in Iran. METHODS: The Persian version of NOSACQ-50 was distributed among 661 employees of a steel company in Qazvin Province (Iran). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis were used to determine the dimensions of the questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach α coefficient. Pearson correlation test was applied to investigate the correlation between different dimensions. RESULTS: The results of EFA showed that the Persian version of NOSACQ-50 consisted of six dimensions. The Cronbach α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.94. The mean score of safety climate in all dimensions was 2.89 (standard deviation 0.60). CONCLUSION: The Persian version of NOSACQ-50 had a satisfactory validity for measuring safety climate in the studied Iranian population.
Climate*
;
Iran
;
Occupational Health
;
Psychological Theory
;
Steel*
6.A Descriptive Study of Occupational Health Services in Self-employed Enterprises (Nanoscale Enterprises), Shiraz, Iran.
Mehdi JAHANGIRI ; Akbar ROSTAMABADI ; Parvaneh YEKZAMANI ; Bahare MAHMOOD ABADI ; Fariborz BEHBOOD ; Seyyedeh Fatemeh AHMADI ; Zahra MOMENI
Safety and Health at Work 2016;7(4):317-321
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted with aim of providing an overview of the current status of occupational health services and identifying the most common harmful agents at workplaces of Iranian self-employed enterprises (Nano-Scale Enterprises). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed among a random sample including 1,758 employees engaging in self-employed enterprises with 5 and less employees. RESULTS: Coverage of occupational health surveillance was very poor, annual health examinations were been conducted only for 64 (3.64%) of males and 31 (1.76%) of females, and occupational health trainings were not included of the services at all. Personal Protective Equipment were available in 462 (26.3%) of the enterprises. only in 0.4% of the enterprises working processes were been equipped by a local exhaust ventilation system. Difficult postures were the most common (81.5%) adverse working conditions. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a poor level of the implementation of occupational health services in Iranian self-employed enterprises. Based on the findings, providing basic training on the occupational health, more enforcing in conduction of health examinations and providing PPE, and taking appropriate strategies aimed at eliminating or minimizing work environment harmful agents are the major factor that should be considered to improve the level of occupational health services among the studied enterprises.
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Iran*
;
Male
;
Occupational Health Services*
;
Occupational Health*
;
Personal Protective Equipment
;
Posture
;
Ventilation
7.Respiratory Disorders Among Workers in Slaughterhouses.
Abbasali KASAEINASAB ; Mehdi JAHANGIRI ; Ali KARIMI ; Hamid Reza TABATABAEI ; Sonia SAFARI
Safety and Health at Work 2017;8(1):84-88
BACKGROUND: Workers in slaughterhouses are exposed to a wide range of biological contaminants, such as bacteria and fungi, due to their working environment. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of respiratory disorders among workers in slaughterhouses. METHODS: This study was conducted on 81 workers in slaughterhouses and 81 healthy office workers as a reference group. The American Thoracic Society standard respiratory symptoms questionnaire was used to determine the prevalence of respiratory disorders. Besides, lung function tests were conducted using a calibrated spirometer at the beginning (preshift) and at the end (postshift) of the 1st working day. Single-stage Anderson sampler was used to measure the concentration of bioaerosols in different parts of slaughterhouses. RESULTS: The prevalence of respiratory disorders, such as cough, productive cough, breathlessness, phlegm, and wheezing, was 3.17, 4.02, 3.07, 4.66, and 3.94 times, respectively, higher among workers in slaughterhouses compared with the reference group. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of respiratory disorders was significantly higher among workers in slaughterhouses. Thus, the significant reduction in the percentage predicted lung function among workers in slaughterhouses might be associated with exposure to bioaerosols in their work environment.
Abattoirs*
;
Bacteria
;
Cough
;
Dyspnea
;
Fungi
;
Lung
;
Prevalence
;
Respiratory Function Tests
;
Respiratory Sounds
8.Evaluation of Respiratory Protection Program in Petrochemical Industries: Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process.
Hadi KOLAHI ; Mehdi JAHANGIRI ; Haleh GHAEM ; Akbar ROSTAMABADI ; Mandana AGHABEIGI ; Payam FARHADI ; Mojtaba KAMALINIA
Safety and Health at Work 2018;9(1):95-100
BACKGROUND: Respiratory protection equipment (RPE) is the last resort to control exposure to workplace air pollutants. A comprehensive respiratory protection program (RPP) ensures that RPE is selected, used, and cared properly. Therefore, RPP must be well integrated into the occupational health and safety requirements. In this study, we evaluated the implementation of RPP in Iranian petrochemical industries to identify the required solutions to improve the current status of respiratory protection. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 24 petrochemical industries in Iran. The survey instrument was a checklist extracted from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration respiratory protection standard. An index, Respiratory Protection Program Index (RPPI), was developed and weighted by analytic hierarchy process to determine the compliance rate (CR) of provided respiratory protection measures with the RPP standard. Data analysis was performed using Excel 2010. RESULTS: The most important element of RPP, according to experts, was respiratory hazard evaluation. The average value of RPPI in the petrochemical plants was 49 ± 15%. The highest and lowest of CR among RPP elements were RPE selection and medical evaluation, respectively. CONCLUSION: None of studied petrochemical industries implemented RPP completely. This can lead to employees' overexposure to hazardous workplace air contaminants. Increasing awareness of employees and employers through training is suggested by this study to improve such conditions.
Air Pollutants
;
Checklist
;
Compliance
;
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Health Resorts
;
Iran
;
Occupational Health
;
Statistics as Topic
;
United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration
9.Assessment of Masks Used by Healthcare Workers: Development and Validation of a Mask Qualitative Assessment Tool (MQAT)
Vahid GHARIBI ; Rosanna COUSINS ; Hamidreza MOKARAMI ; Mehdi JAHANGIRI ; Mohammad A. KESHAVARZ ; Mohammad M. SHIRMOHAMMADI-BAHADORAN
Safety and Health at Work 2022;13(3):364-371
Background:
Respiratory masks can provide healthcare workers with protection from biological hazards when they have good performance. There is a direct relationship between the visual specifications of a mask and its efficacy; thus, the aim of this study was to develop tools for qualitative assessment of the performance of masks used by healthcare workers.
Methods:
A mixed-methods design was used to develop a qualitative assessment tool for medical face masks (MFM) and particle filtering half masks (PFHM). The development of domains and items was undertaken using observation and interviews, the opinions of an expert panel, and a review of texts and international standards. The second phase evaluated the psychometric properties of tools. Finally, the validated Mask Qualitative Assessment Tools (MQAT) were used to assess six samples from 10 brands of the two types of masks.
Results:
MQAT-MFM and MQAT-PHFM shared 42 items across seven domains: “cleanliness,” “design,” “marking, labeling and packaging,” “mask layers,” “mask strap,” “materials and construction,” and “nose clip.” MQAT-MFM included one additional item. MQAT-PHFM included another nine items associated with an eighth “Practical Performance” domain, and the valve version had another additional “Exhalation Valve” domain and six items. The evaluation indicated 80% compliance for MFM and 71% compliance for PFHM. “Marking, labeling and packaging” and “Layers” were associated with the least compliance in both types of masks and should be checked carefully for defining mask quality.
Conclusion
MQAT can be used for immediate screening and initial assessment of MFM and PHFM through appearance, simple tools, and visual inspection.
10.Understanding Occupational Accidents in Tunnelling Construction Using a Natural Experiment
Mehdi Jahangiri ; Rosanna Cousins ; Mojtaba Kamalinia ; Narges Khanjani ; Vahid Gharibi
Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences 2021;17(No.4):150-156
Introduction: Reducing occupational accidents is of utmost importance. This research investigated how individual
and job-related risk factors affect occupational accidents in one of the largest tunnelling companies in Iran. Methods:
A descriptive cross-sectional natural experiment utilizing data from 760 employees who consented to participate in
the study. 150 individuals had a history of occupational accidents and 610 individuals did not. Information about
accidents was extracted from reports, medical records, and interviews. Results: The main causes of accidents were
unsafe acts performed by workers. 71% by unsafe acts alone, and another 12% unsafe acts in unsafe conditions. The
odds ratio of occupational accidents was significantly higher in workers aged under 30 years (p = 0.016), with a high
school diploma or lower educational achievement (p = 0.012), low job satisfaction (p = 0.035), work experience less
than 16 years (p = 0.023), as well as lack of regular exercise (p = 0.001). Within the final adjusted logistic model,
low levels of education (OR= 5.81; 95% CI, 1.03-9.03) and younger age group (OR= 2.38 95% CI, 0.24 to 8.02)
remained significant. Conclusion: Use of young and inexperienced staff, low education, and lack of simple and understandable safety guidelines for workers in the tunnelling industry have led to unsafe acts that can increase the rate
of occupational accidents. Changes in working conditions, and unstable job security also contribute to explaining
the accident rates in this 12-month period. Managers should pay special attention to these individual-organizational
factors to prevent accidents and promote safety.