Objective : To determine how much label information on over-the-counter (OTC) medicines is contained on packaging, we investigated the items, description methods, and area of label information on packages.
Methods : We selected 75 common cold remedy products for investigation and classified the items into 3 categories (“items for use”, “items with a regulation requirement”, “items related to product image”) and measured the space given to each item in the total package area.
Results : All 75 products had “items with a regulation requirement (total 13 items),” but 8 products (only 2 manufacturers) had “consult a physician or pharmacist before use,” which was not a regulation requirement.  There were differences in description methods, especially in “caution” and “product name.”  Sixty percent of the OTC products used non-red characters with no box-frame, and 11% used red characters and box-frames.  The description order was not standardized, but “caution” was located in the lowest space on 80% of products.  Many item descriptions appeared in one place, but “product name” generally appeared in more than 4 places. While 4.5 to 8.0 points were commonly given for “items for use,” 16 to 100 points were given for “product name,” and the difference in number of points was greater than 6-fold among products.  The percentage of average area for “items related to product image” (6.1%) was 2-fold greater than for “items for use” (3.1%) and “items with a regulation requirement” (2.9%).  Almost half of the total package area was blank space.
Conclusion : Current descriptions in label information vary among items, products, and pharmaceutical companies.  Rules on describing information on OTC medicine packaging are thus necessary.

Appropriate clinical communication between patients and physicians requires better cooperation based on patientphysician rapport and consensus development through information sharing.Developing appropriate clinical communication is also important for safer and more reliable clinical care. The aim of the present study was to illustrate an effective politeness strategy for appropriate clinical communication.
1) We conducted focus-group interviews and performed qualitative analysis on the basis of the results of interviews of both patients and physicians.We also performed an Internet survey and organized an Internet-based discussion ofthe politeness strategy and its effectiveness.
2) Patients may consider physicians' overuse of honorifics as feigned politeness, Both patients and physicians recognize that such overuse may work against the development of rapport-based cooperation.
3) Patients may expect physicians to use simpler honorifics, such as “-san.”However, by using honorifics physicians can show respect to patients and establish a more intimate relationship with patients through both positive and negative politeness strategies.
4) When physicians can better understand and use local dialects, the effects of positive politeness may reduce the psychological distance between patients and physicians, have a relaxing effect on patients, and improve clinical information gathering.
5) A positive politeness strategy, such as admiring and talking optimistically, may have different effects depending on the patient's condition or“face.”If successful, this strategy can contribute to the behavioral changes of patients.

A survey was conducted to determine the current status and issues of dysphagia care in hospitals and long-term care facilities in Gifu Prefecture. Responses were obtained from 14 hospitals, 13 welfare facilities for elderly adults requiring long-term care (WFs), and 13 geriatric health services facilities (GHSFs). Dysphagia teams were present at 12 hospitals, 4 WFs, and 8 GHSFs. The teams primarily consisted of general nurses (hospitals = 12, WFs = 4, GHSFs = 8; same order below), certified dysphagia nurses (11, 1, 0), nutritionists (11, 4, 7), speech-languagehearing therapists (11, 0, 5), physicians (7, 2, 4), and pharmacists (7, 0, 0). Facilities that employed certified dysphagia nurses conducted screening for dysphagia, but many hospitals and long-term care facilities did not review patients’ medications to identify medications that could cause dysphagia. In addition, many hospitals did not educate care workers about assisting with eating and swallowing. This demonstrates a need to improve dysphagia-related screening and educational systems for nurses and care workers at hospitals and long-term care facilities.