OBJECTIVE: This randomized, single-blind, two-arm controlled study compared the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of an intravaginal suppository preparation containing metronidazole 750mg + miconazole 200mg (Neopenotran Forte) with another vaginal preparation containing metronidazole 500 mg + nystatin 10000 IU (Flagystatin) in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV), candidal and trichomonial vulvovaginitis (CVV, TV), mixed vaginitis and in the prevention of secondary candidal vulvovaginitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women ages 18-45 years with chief complaints of abnormal vaginal discharge or vaginal/vulvar itching were examined and microbiologic confirmation of BV, VVC, TV or mixed infection was made. They were then randomly assigned to receive either treatment once daily (nightly) for 7 days. A total of 261 subjects had evaluable clinical and microbiological findings at the end of the study. Test of cure by Amsel criteria and Nugent score were performed twice after treatment.

RESULTS: The overall test revealed that microbiological cure rate is significantly different between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSION: The odds of being cured microbiologically is 2.35 times more in the metronidazole 750mg + miconazole nitrate 200mg group compared to the metronidazole 500 mg + nystatin 10000 IU group. However, no significant difference in the clinical cure between the two groups was found. Both drugs are safe and convenient to use.

Human ; Female ; Adult ; Young Adult ; Vaginosis, Bacterial ; Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal ; Suppositories ; Vaginitis

Introduction: Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) is a significant marker of cardiovascular disease and is prevalent but underdiagnosed. Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) is the recommended screening test for PAD. However, not all clinics have a Doppler ultrasound. ABI by palpation offers a more feasible alternative. Objective: This study aims to determine the validity of ABI measurement by palpation method in the screening of PAD. Methodology: This prospective validation study utilized a cross-sectional analytic design. Three physicians performed the ABI by palpation method and their result was compared to the Doppler ABI. The accuracy indices for validation was computed per physician conducting the ABI by palpation and also as an average of all 3 palpation method readings. During the course of sampling, there were no patients with severe PAD found during the prospective period. Results: The accuracy of Ankle Brachial Index using Palpation method yielded the following ranges, sensitivity between 63.16 % - 73.68%, specificity of 94.06% - 98.02%, PPV within 85.37% - 95.45%, and NPV within 80.73% - 86.84% in predicting PAD. The accuracy indices were clinically acceptable. Meanwhile, the raters’ usage of Ankle Brachial Index using Palpation method demonstrated a substantial agreement with ABI by Doppler Method performed by the angiologist (Cohen Kappa >0.60). Conclusion The ABI by palpation is a good screening tool for PAD, but the person performing it must be adequately trained to do the procedure. The procedure is affordable and convenient, and should be done routinely during clinic visits in the physical examination of patients with known risk factors for PAD.
Diabetes Mellitus ; Ankle Brachial Index ; Palpation

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of a selected population of patients on herbal dietary supplements (HDS).
METHOD: Methodological triangulation was used to generate a conceptual framework on HDS KAP. A survey of 175 patients was performed to measure knowledge and attitudes regarding HDS and SPSS was used for data analysis. Inverviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted to further explore the attitudes and practices, and constant comparison method was used for analysis of responses.
RESULTS: Respondents were generally aware of HDS. Majority of survey respondents believed that HDS are different from conventional drugs (52.0%, p<0.05). However, knowledge on the role of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in regulating HDS and understanding of "No Approved Therapeutic Claims" were poor.
The attitude toward HDS was generally positive. Majority (64.0%, p<0.05) were positive toward their perceived health benefits as claimed for the prevention of diseases, while a smaller percentage (46.9%, p<0.05) believed in their benefit for the treatment of diseases. A favorable attitude regardings HDS safety was observed due to the idea of their being "herbal" and "natural".
Among the survey respondents, only 22% were HDS users. Family was shown to promote use while cost deterred their use.
CONCLUSION: Individual knowledge and attitudes on HDS exert significant influence toward HDS practices. Factors that promote use are poor knowledge and positive attitudes toward HDS. Good knowledge seems to lead to judicious use or non-use.

Human ; Male ; Female ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Focus Groups ; United States Food And Drug Administration ; Awareness ; Perception ; Safety ; Attitude ; Dietary Supplements