1.Introducing the Efforts of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Committee of Sports Part.5
Sachiko IKEMUNE ; Shigeki IZUMI ; Yasuhisa KANEKO ; Hiroshi KONDO ; Hinata SAKURABA ; Masanori TAMACHI ; Hideki FUJIMOTO ; Naruto YOSHIDA ; Yukihiro YOSHIDA ; Eiji FURUYA
Journal of the Japan Society of Acupuncture and Moxibustion 2015;65(3):203-204
3.Introducing the Efforts of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Committee of Sports Part.7
Hinata SAKURABA ; Sachiko IKEMUNE ; Shigeki IZUMI ; Yasuhisa KANEKO ; Hiroshi KONDO ; Masanori TAMACHI ; Hideki FUJIMOTO ; Naruto YOSHIDA ; Yukihiro YOSHIDA ; Eiji FURUYA
Journal of the Japan Society of Acupuncture and Moxibustion 2016;66(1):54-55
4.Introducing the Effects of Acupuncture and Moxibution Committee of Sports Part.8
Hideki FUJIMOTO ; Sachiko IKEMUNE ; Shigeki IZUMI ; Yasuhisa KANEKO ; Hiroshi KONDO ; Hinata SAKURABA ; Masanori TAMACHI ; Naruto YOSHIDA ; Yukihiro YOSHIDA ; Eiji FURUYA
Journal of the Japan Society of Acupuncture and Moxibustion 2016;66(3):245-246
5.Danger of Saponated Cresol Solution in the Tohno Area ;
Hiroyuki OHBAYASHI ; Masanori NISHIO ; Misao ANDO ; Masaki YOSHIDA ; Hiroyuki NOSAKA ; Hirohiko YAMASE
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2004;53(4):660-665
We experienced a clinical case of a patient with psychotic depression who ingested the residual saponated cresol solution from a 500ml bottle of cresol, a disinfectant, with the intention of committing suicide. Through this experience, we felt it neccessary to investigate the present commercial situation of cresol for domestic use, and to come up with some safty measares.All the 128 drugstores and pharmacies in four cities located in the Tohno area of Gifu Pref. (Mizunami, Toki, Tajimi and Ena) were queried by telephone about the sale and stock of cresol.Almost 80% of the drugstores in these four cities, excluding pharmacies, were found to deal in saponated cresol solutions. They carried a little more than two 500ml bottles of cresol on average. This volume exceeds an estimated adult lethal dose of 250ml.Although it is unlikely that an ordinary household will use the whole of 500ml bottle of the disinfectant at a time, the residual saponated cresol solution could increase the risk of accidental cresol poisoning at home.So, it would be desirable not to sell 500ml bottles in ordinary drugstores. Furthermore, before selling a bottle of cresol, the pharmacists, who have a specialized knowledge about it, should kindly explain to the user about its toxicity and usage.
cresol
;
Solutions
;
Area
;
Disinfectants
;
Cancer patients and suicide and depression
6.Pazopanib as a second line treatment for uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma: a single institutional study.
Tadaaki NISHIKAWA ; Kosei HASEGAWA ; Akira YABUNO ; Hiroyuki YOSHIDA ; Masanori YASUDA ; Eito KOZAWA ; Keiichi FUJIWARA
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2017;28(1):e25-
No abstract available.
Carcinosarcoma*
7.Comparison of treatment outcomes of surgery and radiotherapy, including concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage Ib2-IIb cervical adenocarcinoma patients: a retrospective study
Eiji KONDO ; Kenta YOSHIDA ; Tsutomu TABATA ; Yoichi KOBAYASHI ; Wataru YAMAGAMI ; Yasuhiko EBINA ; Masanori KANEUCHI ; Satoru NAGASE ; Hiroko MACHIDA ; Mikio MIKAMI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2022;33(2):e14-
Objective:
The study compared the treatment outcomes of surgery versus radiotherapy, including concurrent chemoradiotherapy, in stage Ib2–IIb cervical adenocarcinoma patients in Japan.
Methods:
Of 57,470 patients diagnosed with stage I–IV cervical cancer from January 2001–December 2011, 1,932 patients with stage Ib2–IIb cervical adenocarcinoma were initially treated by surgery or radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS) in all and 614 propensity score-matched (PSM) patients (307 per group). We compared OS and prognosis factors based on age, primary stage, and treatment arm.
Results:
In Japan, >80% (n=1,573) of stage Ib2–IIb cervical adenocarcinoma patients underwent surgery. The 5-year OS of surgery vs. radiotherapy groups were 82.1% (n=704) vs. 79.7% (n=59) (hazard ratio [HR]=1.494; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.826–2.702; p=0.181) for stage Ib2, 76.6% (n=239) vs. 66.7% (n=54) (HR=1.679; 95% CI=0.986–2.858; p=0.053) for stage IIa, and 71.1% (n=630) vs. 58.9% (n=246) (HR=1.711; 95% CI=1.341–2.184; p<0.001) for stage IIb. In 614 PSM patients balanced for age and carcinoma stage Ib2–IIb, the 5-year OS of surgery vs. radiation groups was 73.0% (n=307) vs. 65.5% (n=307) (HR=1.394; 95% CI=1.044–1.860; p=0.023). In multivariable analysis, age (HR=1.293; 95% CI=1.045–1.601; p=0.018), treatment arm, radiotherapy (HR=1.556; 95% CI=1.253–1.933; p<0.001), and stage IIb (HR=1.783; 95% CI=1.443–2.203; p=0.018) were independent prognosis factors for 5-year OS in stage Ib2–IIb adenocarcinoma patients.
Conclusion
Age (>65 years), treatment arm (radiotherapy), and stage IIb significantly affect OS in cervical adenocarcinoma patients. Surgery may be considered for <65-year-old patients with stage IIb adenocarcinoma.
8.HER2-negative or low expression as an unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with stage I/II uterine carcinosarcoma
Chiharu MIZOGUCHI ; Tadaaki NISHIKAWA ; Hiroshi YOSHIDA ; Masanori YASUDA ; Tomoyasu KATO ; Kosei HASEGAWA ; Kan YONEMORI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(1):e14-
Objective:
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is uncommon high-grade endometrial cancer with limited treatment options. We evaluated the prognostic significance of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression and HER2 gene amplification within large cohorts of UCS, and clarify clinicopathologic characteristics of HER2-low UCS.
Methods:
We examined HER2 protein expression in 148 patients of UCS using in vivo diagnostic HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) kits and HER2 gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 72 patients.
Results:
HER2 IHC score was evaluated according to the latest American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists criteria for gastric cancer, which was negative in 41 patients, low expression of 1+ was observed in 57 patients, and HER2 high expression was observed in 50 patients (2+ in 38 and 3+ in 12 patients). There was no significant statistical difference in clinicopathological characteristics based on HER2 protein expression status.HER2 negative and low expression compared to high expression revealed poor overall survival in stage I/ II. The concordance between IHC and FISH results were relatively low compared to other cancer types (HER2 IHC score 1+, 2+, and 3+ were 5%, 15%, and 50%), and combining these results was not efficient as a prognostic factor in UCS. In contrast, the HER2 IHC score alone was a prognostic factor in stage I/II UCS. HER2 low group did not show specific clinicopathologic features.
Conclusion
Since the HER2 IHC score low in advanced UCS is a predictive factor, stratification of UCS using HER2 IHC score for HER2 IHC score low group and developing adjuvant therapy may be proposed in the near future.
9.HER2-negative or low expression as an unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with stage I/II uterine carcinosarcoma
Chiharu MIZOGUCHI ; Tadaaki NISHIKAWA ; Hiroshi YOSHIDA ; Masanori YASUDA ; Tomoyasu KATO ; Kosei HASEGAWA ; Kan YONEMORI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(1):e14-
Objective:
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is uncommon high-grade endometrial cancer with limited treatment options. We evaluated the prognostic significance of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression and HER2 gene amplification within large cohorts of UCS, and clarify clinicopathologic characteristics of HER2-low UCS.
Methods:
We examined HER2 protein expression in 148 patients of UCS using in vivo diagnostic HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) kits and HER2 gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 72 patients.
Results:
HER2 IHC score was evaluated according to the latest American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists criteria for gastric cancer, which was negative in 41 patients, low expression of 1+ was observed in 57 patients, and HER2 high expression was observed in 50 patients (2+ in 38 and 3+ in 12 patients). There was no significant statistical difference in clinicopathological characteristics based on HER2 protein expression status.HER2 negative and low expression compared to high expression revealed poor overall survival in stage I/ II. The concordance between IHC and FISH results were relatively low compared to other cancer types (HER2 IHC score 1+, 2+, and 3+ were 5%, 15%, and 50%), and combining these results was not efficient as a prognostic factor in UCS. In contrast, the HER2 IHC score alone was a prognostic factor in stage I/II UCS. HER2 low group did not show specific clinicopathologic features.
Conclusion
Since the HER2 IHC score low in advanced UCS is a predictive factor, stratification of UCS using HER2 IHC score for HER2 IHC score low group and developing adjuvant therapy may be proposed in the near future.
10.HER2-negative or low expression as an unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with stage I/II uterine carcinosarcoma
Chiharu MIZOGUCHI ; Tadaaki NISHIKAWA ; Hiroshi YOSHIDA ; Masanori YASUDA ; Tomoyasu KATO ; Kosei HASEGAWA ; Kan YONEMORI
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2025;36(1):e14-
Objective:
Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is uncommon high-grade endometrial cancer with limited treatment options. We evaluated the prognostic significance of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression and HER2 gene amplification within large cohorts of UCS, and clarify clinicopathologic characteristics of HER2-low UCS.
Methods:
We examined HER2 protein expression in 148 patients of UCS using in vivo diagnostic HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) kits and HER2 gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 72 patients.
Results:
HER2 IHC score was evaluated according to the latest American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists criteria for gastric cancer, which was negative in 41 patients, low expression of 1+ was observed in 57 patients, and HER2 high expression was observed in 50 patients (2+ in 38 and 3+ in 12 patients). There was no significant statistical difference in clinicopathological characteristics based on HER2 protein expression status.HER2 negative and low expression compared to high expression revealed poor overall survival in stage I/ II. The concordance between IHC and FISH results were relatively low compared to other cancer types (HER2 IHC score 1+, 2+, and 3+ were 5%, 15%, and 50%), and combining these results was not efficient as a prognostic factor in UCS. In contrast, the HER2 IHC score alone was a prognostic factor in stage I/II UCS. HER2 low group did not show specific clinicopathologic features.
Conclusion
Since the HER2 IHC score low in advanced UCS is a predictive factor, stratification of UCS using HER2 IHC score for HER2 IHC score low group and developing adjuvant therapy may be proposed in the near future.