Objective: To present a case of transorbital penetrating intracranial injury successfully managed using a stepwise multispecialty approach. Methods: This is a case report. Results: A 26-year-old male presented with a motorcycle side-mirror metal bar impaled into his right orbit. He had a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 12. Computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed the metal bar’s trajectory from the right lateral canthus, traversing the superior orbital wall and frontal lobe, resulting in contusion, intracranial hemorrhages and multiple orbital and facial fractures. Despite the severity of the injury, the right globe was found to be intact during intraoperative exploration. The transorbital approach was employed for safe removal of the penetrating object, followed by repair of full-thickness eyelid laceration and transections of the lateral and medial canthi. Subsequently, the Neurosurgery service conducted a right pterional craniotomy, debridement, and duraplasty. Upon discharge, the visual acuity on the right eye was 20/50. Conclusion Transorbital penetrating intracranial injuries are rare and result in vision loss and life-threatening complications. A transorbital approach in removing a penetrating foreign body can be adopted when injury to cerebral tissues is imminent. Individualizing the management and employing a multispecialty approach can lead to favorable outcomes.

Objective: We report a case of a scleral buckle mimicking an orbital tumor 28 years after a retinal detachment repair. Methods: This is a case report. Results: A 75-year-old male consulted for progressive, painless blurred vision of the right eye. He had a history of scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment on the right eye in 1990 that restored his vision. Examination showed right eye ophthalmoplegia and inferior displacement of the globe. Imaging revealed a right supero-temporal orbital mass. Excision of the encapsulated mass was performed. Histopathology revealed an acellular, amorphous, granular and eosinophilic material with no evidence of malignancy. These were consistent with a foreign body. Postoperatively, there were improvements in ocular motility and hypoglobus. Conclusion In patients who present with limited ocular motility and have undergone scleral buckling, hydrogel scleral buckle overexpansion should be considered. Excision of such implants is warranted to resolve the signs and symptoms and confirm the etiology.
Retinal Detachment ; Scleral Buckling