OBJECTIVE:To observe the clinical efficacy and sequela of Salvia miltiorrhiza treatment for severe craniocere-bral injury patients after operation. METHODS:60 severe craniocerebral injury patients were randomly divided into control group and treatment group with 30 cases in each group. Control group was given routine and symptomatic treatment after clearance of hematoma by craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy according to the patient’s condition;treatment group was additionally giv-en intravenous injection of Danshen injection 20 ml/d for 7-10 days 3-5 days after operation without hemorrhagic tendency,on the basis of control group,and then given Compound danshen dropping pills instead (10 pills/time,3 times/d) for one month. GCS score,GOS score,intracranial pressure and brain CT,the levels of ET and CRP were compared between 2 groups after op-eration. The occurrence of sequelae were evaluated 3 months after operation. RESULTS:After the operation,S. miltiorrhiza treat-ment could increase GCS score and GOS score,reduced intracranial pressure and brain edema of craniocerebral injury patients, and the improvement of clinical symptoms in treatment group was significantly faster than in control group,with statistical signifi-cance(P<0.05 or P<0.01). The postoperative S. miltiorrhiza treatment could decrease the levels of ET and CRP in patients with craniocerebral injury in the time-dependent manner,the decreased of treatment group was significantly faster than that of control group,with statistical significance (P<0.05 or P<0.01). The effective of postoperative sequelae improvement was 93.3% in treatment group,which was significantly higher than that of control group(76.7%),with statistical significance(P<0.05). CON-CLUSIONS:Postoperative S. miltiorrhiza treatment can improve the clinical symptoms of severe craniocerebral injury patients,re-duce the incidence of complication and improve the prognosis. The effect may be related to the decrease of plasma ET and CRP levels.

Objective:To compare the clinical outcomes between OTA/AO-C open and closed fractures of the distal humerus treated by open reduction and internal fixation.Methods:The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed of the 70 patients who had been treated at Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital for OTA/AO-C fractures of the distal humerus from January 2014 to June 2017. Of them, 22 suffered from open fractures (Gustilo types Ⅰ/Ⅱ) and 48 closed fractures. There were 18 males and 4 females with an age of (42.6±13.0) years in the open group and 21 males and 27 females with an age of (42.2±17.1) years in the closed group. Analyzed were interval from injury to surgery, hospitalization time, injury energy and functional outcomes which included range of motion (ROM) in elbow flexion and extension, ROM in elbow rotation, Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), complications and rate of secondary surgery.Results:There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in age, injury energy or interval from injury to surgery ( P>0.05), but there were significantly more males in the open group than in the closed group ( P=0.011). The follow-up time for all the patients averaged 34.0 months (from 25 to 54 months). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in hospitalization time [9.5(6.0, 13.0) d versus 8.5 (6.0, 11.0) d], ROM in flexion and extension [120.0° (100.0°, 137.8°) versus 128.5° (110.0°, 140.0°)], ROM in rotation [155.0° (151.3°, 155.0°) versus 155.0° (155.0°, 155.0°)], MEPS [95.0 (80.0, 100.0) versus 95.0 (80.0, 100.0)] or DASH [2.6 (0.63, 9.2) versus 1.7 (0.0, 8.5)] ( P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups either in rate of secondary surgery [36.4% (8/22) versus 33.3% (16/48)], ulnar nerve symptoms [54.5% (12/22) versus 60.4% (29/48)], local irritability in the region of internal fixation [9.1% (2/22) versus 6.3% (3/48)] or elbow stiffness [13.6% (3/22) versus 10.4% (5/48)] ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Open reduction and internal fixation can lead to similar clinical outcomes in the treatment of both open (Gustilo types Ⅰ/Ⅱ) and closed distal humeral fractures of OTA/AO-C, with no significant differences in postoperative ROM, functional scores or complications.

Objective To investigate the situation of concomitant anxiety in posttraumatic elbow stiffness and analyze the risk factors for posttraumatic elbow stiffness.Methods Participants for this investigation were the outpatients who had sought special medical attention for elbow injury from September to October, 2017 and from May to June, 2018 at Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital. Their demographic and injury-related data ( gender, age, education, injury time, injury type, treatment and rehabilitation ) were collected through questionnaires. Self-rating Anxiety Scale ( SAS ) was used to evaluate their anxiety. The range of motion ( ROM ) of the elbow was measured by the same qualified orthopedist. The relationship between posttraumatic elbow stiffness and anxiety and risk factors for stiffness were analyzed sta-tistically. Results The proportion of concomitant anxiety ( 39.2%) in the patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness was significantly higher than that in those without posttraumatic elbow stiffness ( 10.5%, P＝0.021 ) . The SAS score for the patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness ( 47.6 ± 11.6 ) was significantly higher than that ( 38.9 ± 8.2 ) for those without posttraumatic elbow stiffness ( P＝0.004 ). Passive rehabil-itation was a risk factor for flexion-extension stiffness. Complex intra-articular fracture, high-energy injury and passive rehabilitation were risk factors for limited forearm rotation. Conclusions Our study suggests the comorbidity of posttraumatic elbow stiffness and anxiety. Complex intra-articular fracture, high-energy injury and passive rehabilitation are risk factors for forearm rotational stiffness after elbow trauma. Passive rehabil-itation is also a predictor of less range of flexion-extension of the elbow.

Objective:To compare the outcomes between hook thin plate compression technique and conventional screw-plate fixation in the treatment of adolescent tibial tubercle avulsion fractures.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed of the 43 adolescent patients with tibial tubercle avulsion fracture who had been treated at Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2018 to October 2020. There were 42 males and one female, aged from 13 to 17 years. According to their treatment methods, they were divided into an observation group (9 cases) treated with hook thin plate compression technique and a control group (34 cases) treated with fixation with cannulated screws alone or in addition with a 1/3 tube plate. The maximum range of knee flexion, B?stman score, and cases returning to school at one month after operation, as well as fracture union time, B?stman score and cases with complications at the last follow-up were compared between the 2 groups.Results:There were no significant differences in the preoperative general data between the 2 groups, showing comparability ( P>0.05). By the postoperative one month, the maximum range of knee flexion [90.0° (85.0°, 102.5°)], B?stman score [21.0 (18.5, 21.0)] and cases returning to school (7) in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group [22.5° (15.0°, 30.0°), 11.0 (10.0, 13.0), and 0] ( P<0.001). The last follow-up revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups in frature union time [(2.7±0.5) months versus (2.8±0.5) months], B?stman score [30.0 (30.0, 30.0) versus 30.0 (30.0, 30.0), 30.0)] or cases with complications (1 versus 2) ( P>0.05). Conclusion:In the treatment of adolescent tibial tubercle avulsion fractures, compared with conventional fixation with cannulated screws alone or in addition with a 1/3 tube plate, hook thin plate compression technique may lead to better outcomes, because it allows early rehabilitation to shorten the postoperative immobilization time and promote early functional recovery.

Chronic elbow dislocation has a low incidence, but high disability rate, often leads to complications such as stiffness and instability, whose management is still a huge challenge in orthopedics traumatology. The mainstream strategy now is to reduce the elbow after extensive soft tissue release, repair or reconstruct collateral ligaments, stabilize the elbow with a hinged external fixator, and start rehabilitation as soon as possible. However, as evidence supporting treatment approaches comes mostly from small case series and case reports, controversies still remain in some intraoperative issues, such as the choice of surgical approach, the indications and methods of triceps lengthening and the reconstruction of ligaments. Combining relevant literature and clinical experience, the authors discussed the research progress in diagnosis and treatment of chronic elbow dislocation, suggesting that clinical doctors should focus on prevention rather than treatment of this disease, and advocated further reducing the incidence and disability rate of chronic elbow dislocation.

Objective To investigate the treatment of radi us head fracture through internal fi xation.Methods 42cases of radius head fracture trea ted with internal fixation were foll owed up.Mason classification and Broberg and Morrey criteria were use d to analyze the correlation between the results and the factors of fractu re type and method of fixation.Results42cases were followed up for a mean time of 25months.Evaluation was done according to Broberg and Morrey score systems.The function recovered we ll in 76%of the cases.The results of minor plate group were better than th ose of the screw(P=0.01)or K wire group(P=0.04).The results of Mason typeⅡwere better than those of the typeⅣ(P=0.03).Conclusion Treatment of radius head fracture with internal fixation will improve the elbow function and has better result for Mason typeⅡ.Fixation with minor plate is better than with screw or K wi re.[

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an effective surgical method for treatment of end-stage elbow arthritis. However, compared with hip and knee arthroplasties, the implant survival rate of TEA remains low, with a high postoperative complications rate and a high revision rate. The main reasons for revision include aseptic loosening, periprosthetic infection, periprosthetic fracture, component failure, and postoperative instability, of which the most common cause is aseptic loosening. Unlike the initial TEA, revision surgery usually needs to deal with complicated conditions such as infection, scars, bone defects, prosthetic stem extraction and cement removal, making the operation more difficult. There are few clinical studies related to TEA revision in China. Therefore, the authors review the reasons for postoperative revision, the management of key intraoperative issues, and the outcomes of treatment to provide the basis for future clinical application and academic research of TEA revision surgery in China.

Objective:To study the clinical efficacy of modified open elbow arthrolysis in the treatment of traumatic elbow stiffness.Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on 120 patients who underwent modified open elbow arthrolysis in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020. The age of the included patients was (37.7±12.4) years (ranged 18-64 years), including 54 males and 66 females. The medical records were reviewed, the range of motion (ROM) and functional status of the patients before operation and at the last follow-up were compared including visual analogue scale (VAS), Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS), Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score. Complications and secondary operations were also recorded. Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation( ± s) and comparison between groups was conducted using the t-test; Measurement data of skewed distribution were expressed as M ( Q1, Q3), and Rank-sum test was used for inter-group comparison. Results:The preoperative extension of 120 patients was 43.6° (33.8°, 60.1°), the flexion was 78.7° (59.8°, 98.1°), and the flexion-extension ROM was 25.6° (0.0°, 54.5°); the preoperative pronation was 51.8° (33.0°, 67.0°), the supination was 85.1° (65.7°, 90.0°), and the rotation ROM was 136.9° (99.1°, 157.5°). Postoperative extension was 14.2° (7.0°, 24.8°), flexion was 129.5° (120.0°, 138.1°), flexion-extension ROM was 115.5° (94.4°, 127.3°); postoperative pronation was 65.0° (47.1°, 75.0°), the supination was 88.3° (78.6°, 90.0°), and the rotation ROM was 151.9° (131.7°, 163.4°). Postoperative extension, flexion, flexion-extension ROM, pronation, supination, and rotation ROM were all higher than those before operation, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.001). The VAS of 120 patients was 1.0 (0.0, 3.0) scores before operation and 0.0 (0.0, 1.0) scores after operation. The MEPS was 60.0 (50.0, 75.0) scores before operation and 100.0 (85.0, 100.0) scores after operation. The preoperative DASH was 37.5 (20.1, 51.3) scores, and the postoperative DASH was 7.9 (3.3, 13.3) scores. The postoperative VAS, MEPS, and DASH were significantly improved compared with those before operation, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.001). Residual ulnar nerve symptoms occurred in 18 cases, recurrence of heterotopic ossification in 42 cases, and hematoma in 3 cases. Conclusions:Modified open elbow arthrolysis is a safe and effective surgical method for the treatment of traumatic elbow stiffness. It can significantly improve the function of the patient, reduce the occurrence of elbow instability, avoid the use of external fixators, and reduce the cost of the patient.

Objective: To explore the risk factors for elbow stiffness after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus. Methods: From January 2013 to May 2017, 159 patients underwent ORIF for intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus with dual plating. They were 83 males and 76 females with a mean age of 42.6 years (from 14 to 79 years). They were divided into 2 groups according to their range of motion at the latest follow-up and the secondary elbow arthrolysis they had undergone or not. The stiffness group had extension-flexion and/or pronation-supination <100° and secondary elbow arthrolysis while the non-stiffness group had extension-flexion and pronation-supination ≥100° and no secondary elbow arthrolysis. Age, gender, fracture side, mechanism of injury, AO fracture classification, open/close fracture, additional fracture, preoperative nerve injury, time from injury to surgery, surgical approach, configuration of plating, medication for anti-heterotopic ossification and implant removal were analyzed as risk factors for elbow stiffness using Logistic regression analysis. Results: The mean follow-up period for this cohort was 32.0 months (from 10 to 63 months). The latest follow-up showed fracture union in all the patients. The stiffness group had 38 patients and the non-stiffness group 121. Multivariate regression analysis showed that high energy trauma (OR=3.141, 95%CI 1.396~7.070, P=0.006) and time from injury to surgery >one week (OR=2.596, 95%CI 1.123~6.000, P=0.026) were independent risk factors for elbow stiffness after ORIF for intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus. Conclusion The patients with high energy trauma and time from injury to surgery >one week should be treated with caution and special care in clinical practice because the 2 factors are closely related to posttraumatic elbow stiffness after ORIF for intercondylar fracture of the distal humerus.

Objective:To investigate the efficacy of TiRobot navigation for hinged external fixation in elbow arthrolysis.Methods:The 11 patients were retrospectively analyzed who had been treated by elbow arthrolysis at Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital using TiRobot navigation for hinged external fixation. There were 9 males and 2 females with a mean age of 39.3 years (from 21 to 66 years). Their elbow range of motion (ROM) was compared between preoperation and the final follow-up. Their visual analogue scale (VAS) and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) and complications were documented at the final follow-up.Results:The rotation axis of the elbow joint was positioned with the aid of intraoperative robot navigation in 11 patients.The deviation of entry point averaged 0.21 mm (from 0.05 to 0.41 mm) and the deviation of exit point 0.23 mm (from 0.06 to 0.38 mm). The follow-up time for the 11 patients averaged 25.8 months (from 16 to 32 months). Their elbow flexion and extension was 133.0° (134.9°, 138.7°) and rotation 164.6° ±17.5° at the final follow-up, significantly improved compared with their preoperative values [0.8°(0°, 33.7°) and 122.9°±49.0°] ( P<0.05). Their VAS averaged 0.2 (from 0 to 1) and MEPS 96.8 (from 85 to 100) at the final follow-up, giving 9 excellent and 2 good cases. There was no case of radial nerve injury, pin instability, pin breakage, pin infection or peri-pin fracture. Conclusion:When TiRobot navigation is used for hinged external fixation in elbow arthrolysis, the axis of rotation can be accurately located, leading to satisfactory functional outcomes for the patients.