1.Clinical curative effect observation on absorbable screw in treatment of limbs joint fracture
Duanguo YAN ; Maogui LI ; Yangyong LOU ; Jiang FENG ; Weiwei HU
Journal of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery 2014;(2):175-176
Objective To investigate the clinical curative effect of absorbable screw in the treatment of Limbs joint fracture. Methods From May 2009 to May 2011, 86 patients of Limbs joint fracture in our hospital were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. The observation group were treated with absorbable screw while the control group were given conventional treatment methods of fracture treatment, and the clinical effect of the two groups were observed after treatment. Results The excellent rate was 56. 3% in control group and 96. 3% in observation group. The excellent rate of the clinical treatment in the observation group was significantly better than the control group with a statistically significant difference (P<0. 05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy of absorbable screw for limbs joint frac-ture is significant, and its operation safety is higher. It improves the life quality of patients and it is worth of clinical promotion.
2.Optimized strategy of anesthesia for modified radical mastectomy: transverse thoracic muscle plane-thoracic nerve block combined with general anesthesia
Jianyou ZHANG ; Lin WANG ; Shitong LI ; Maogui CHEN ; Jianhong SUN ; Fengxia ZHANG
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology 2018;38(9):1103-1106
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of transverse thoracic muscle plane-thoracic nerve block combined with general anesthesia when used for modified radical mastectomy. Methods Sixty female patients, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical statusⅠ or Ⅱ, aged 45-63 yr, weighing 48-72 kg, scheduled for elective modified radical mastectomy, were divided into 3 groups ( n=20 each) using a random number table method: thoracic nerve block-general anesthesia group ( group P+G ) , transverse thoracic muscle plane-thoracic nerve block-general anesthesia group ( group T+P+G) and general anesthesia group ( group G ) . Anesthesia was induced with midazolam, propofol, fentanyl and cisatracurium and maintained with sevoflurane, fentanyl and cisatracurium. Thoracic nerve block typeⅠ and Ⅱ was per-formed after implanting laryngeal mask airway in group P+G. Transverse thoracic muscle plane block was performed after performing thoracic nerve block typeⅠandⅡin group T+P+G. Flurbiprofen 50 mg was in-travenously injected after operation as a rescue analgesic to maintain the Visual Analogue Scale score≤3. The consumption of opioids, emergence time and time for removal of the laryngeal mask airway were recor-ded. Ramsay sedation score was recorded at 10 min after removal of the laryngeal mask airway. The require-ment for rescue analgesia, time of passing flatus and development of nausea and vomiting within 24 h after operation were recorded. Results Compared with group G, the emergence time, time for removal of the laryngeal mask airway and time of passing flatus were significantly shortened, and the Ramsay sedation score, consumption of fentanyl and requirement for rescue analgesia were decreased in P+G and T+P+G groups ( P<0. 05) , and the incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly decreased in group T+P+G ( P<0. 05) . Compared with group P+G, the time for removal of the laryngeal mask airway and time of pass-ing flatus were significantly shortened, the consumption of fentanyl was decreased ( P<0. 05) , and no sig-nificant change was found in the requirement for rescue analgesia or incidence of nausea and vomiting in group T+P+G ( P>0. 05) . Conclusion Transverse thoracic muscle plane-thoracic nerve block combined with general anesthesia can provide satisfactory perioperative analgesia and is helpful in improving prognosis for the patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.
3.Chidamide-BEAC plus autologous stem cell transplantation in high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase II clinical trial.
Yi XIA ; Li WANG ; Kaiyang DING ; Jiazhu WU ; Hua YIN ; Maogui HU ; Haorui SHEN ; Jinhua LIANG ; Ruize CHEN ; Yue LI ; Huayuan ZHU ; Jianyong LI ; Wei XU
Chinese Medical Journal 2023;136(12):1491-1493