BACKGROUND

This first clinical practice guideline (CPG) on osteoporosis prevention and management in the Philippines is the output of a shared undertaking by a multidisciplinary CPG development team spearheaded by the Osteoporosis Society of the Philippines Foundation, Inc. and joined by the Philippine Academy of Family Physicians; the Philippine College of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism; the Philippine Orthopedic Association; the Philippine Obstetrics and Gynecological Society and the Philippine Rheumatology Association. This guideline seeks to augment and update the "Consensus statements on osteoporosis diagnosis, prevention and management in the Philippines," initially published in 2011, incorporating evidence-based practices developed in the last decade.

METHODOLOGY

The steering committee formulated and prioritized clinical questions based on meetings and stakeholder consultations. A PICO (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) format was used to develop clinical questions and guide the systematic search for evidence. The development of guidelines followed the ADAPTE process. Once completed, panel discussions were done using the Evidence to Decision Framework. After the panel discussions, the final recommendations were revised.

RESULTS

Thirty-four recommendations were formulated to address 27 clinical questions related to screening, prevention, diagnosis, pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment, surgical management, follow-up, and continuity of care. With these recommendations, the developers aim to establish a standard of care in the prevention, diagnosis and management of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in both in-patient and out-patient cases that are appropriate to the Philippine context. Specifically, the CPG development group aims to use these recommendations to define the standard of care for osteoporosis as part of universal healthcare services once the program is implemented nationally. Relevant stakeholders may also use the recommendations to inform public and private payor policies for patients with fragility fractures, as well as by local government units or private companies looking to establish orthogeriatric centers with fracture liaison services.

CONCLUSION

This guideline is helpful for physicians and other allied health personnel in screening, diagnosis, management and prevention of primary osteoporosis and fragility fractures among postmenopausal women and older men.

Human ; Philippines ; Guideline ; Osteoporosis

BACKGROUND: Late Onset Neonatal Sepsis (LONS) or nosocomial sepsis has a significant mortality and morbidity that leads to overtreatment. Overtreatment happens when antibiotics are frequently started and/or shifted, eventually leading to increasing antimicrobial resistamce in NICU.
OBJECTIVE: To validate bedside nosocomial sepsis scoringdeveloped by Okascharoen in 2005.
METHODOLOGY: All neonates admitted in NICU suspected of LONS were enrolled. Using Okascharoe scoring, subjects were scored based hypotension/poor perfusion, abnormal body temperature, respiratory insufficiency, complete blood count, and length of umbilical catheter use. Growth of organisms during blood culture is considered positive outcome and is considered confirmed sepsis.
RESULTS: Of the one-hundred-nineteen (119) subjects included in the analysis, 59 were confirmed sepsis and 60 were LONS negative. Subjects with confirmed sepsis had more events of hypotension/poor perfusion (p < 0.001; -0.141, -0.438), thrombocytopenia (p 0.000; -0.169, -0489), and prolonged umbilical catheter usage (p 0.014; -0.051, -0.311). The ROC curve has an AUC of 0.753 (p < 0.001; 0.664-0.842), which means a randomly chosen neonate with LONS will have a higher predicted score than a neonate without LONS. The sensitivity of this tool was 0.92 (0.82-0.97) and specificity of this tool was 0.32 (0.21-0.46) in this setting. The positive LR =1.35 (1.12-1.64) while the negative LR = 0.26 (0.10-0.65)
CONCLUSION: This scoring is a valid tool that can be used in point-of-care scoring for antibiotic stewardship in a neonate with suspected sepsis.
RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that a score > 5 be used to be predictive of late onset sepsis, and this would have sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 61%, positive predictive value of 68.5% and a negative predictive value of 78.3%

Human ; Male ; Adult ; Anti-bacterial Agents ; Neonatal Sepsis ; Anti-infective Agents ; Blood Culture ; Sepsis ; Morbidity ; Hypotension ; Thrombocytopenia ; Blood Cell Count