1.Prescribing patterns in a primary care service in a rural site in the Philippines from April 2019 to March 2020 – A cross-sectional study
Nicole Andrea C. Lanip ; Leonila F. Dans ; Carol Stephanie C. Tan-Lim ; Ma. Liza Antoinette M. Gonzales ; Cara Lois T. Galingana ; Josephine T. Sanchez ; Maria Rhodora N. Aquino ; Arianna Maever Loreche ; Mia P. Rey ; Janelle Micaela S. Panganiban ; Antonio L. Dans
Acta Medica Philippina 2024;58(19):93-100
BACKGROUND
Appropriate use of medication is an important indicator of quality healthcare delivery among children. Previously published studies on drug utilization involved Filipino households in general and were conducted in the 1990s. No recent Philippine studies have been conducted that focus on drug utilization in children.
OBJECTIVETo describe the current prescribing patterns in one primary care service in a rural site in the Philippines using the World Health Organization (WHO) prescribing indicators.
METHODSA cross-sectional study was conducted by review of electronic medical records of patients seen at the primary care facility under the Philippine Primary Care Studies (PPCS) rural site from April 2019 to March 2020. Out of 9,930 total encounters, 623 patient encounters with prescriptions for pediatric patients were included in the study through systematic sampling. The average number of drugs per encounter, percentage of drugs prescribed by their generic names, percentage of encounters with prescribed antibiotics, percentage of encounters with prescribed injections, and percentage of drugs prescribed from the Philippine Drug Formulary were calculated. Values were compared to the cut-offs considered “good practice” for outpatient care in the WHO manual: (1) an average number of less than two drugs per encounter; (2) less than 30% of encounters are prescribed with antibiotics; (3) less than 20% of encounters are prescribed with injections; (4) 100% of drugs are prescribed by generic name; and (5) 100% of drugs are from the formulary.
RESULTSOn the average, three drugs were prescribed per encounter. Most patient encounters (80.9%) involved antibiotics prescription — higher than the WHO standard value of 30%. All drugs were prescribed by generic name and were prescribed from the formulary. Only 0.5% of encounters were prescribed injections, all of which were administered through the intramuscular route. Of the 1,962 prescriptions generated, antibiotics was the most prescribed medication (25.7%). The most common diagnosis was infectious in nature (88.8%).
CONCLUSIONThe primary care service achieved the WHO standard values in terms of prescribing by injections and by generic names. There was a high rate of antibiotic prescriptions at 83%, and a high average number of drugs prescribed per encounter, exceeding the WHO standard value.
Human ; Primary Care ; Primary Health Care
2.The cost of primary care: An experience analysis in an urban setting
Mia P. Rey ; Regine Ynez H. De Mesa ; Jose Rafael A. Marfori ; Noleen Marie C. Fabian ; Romelei Camiling-Alfonso ; Ramon Pedro P. Paterno ; Nannette B. Sundiang ; Ab Yusoph ; Leonila F. Dans ; Cara Lois T. Galingana ; Ma. Rhodora N. Aquino ; Josephine T. Sanchez ; Jesusa T. CATABUI ; Antonio Miguel L. Dans
Acta Medica Philippina 2024;58(23):7-18
OBJECTIVES
PhilHealth’s present health benefit scheme is largely centered on in-patient services. This inadvertently incentivizes hospital admissions for increased access to benefit coverage. To address this problem, this study proposes a costing method to comprehensively finance outpatient care. The objective of this paper is to estimate an annual primary care benefit package (PCBP) cost based on experience analysis (actual benefit usage) on the first year of implementation at an urban pilot site.
METHODSA cost analysis was conducted to assess a disease-agnostic primary care benefit package for an urban outpatient government facility over the first year of implementation. Costing information was gathered through staff interviews, accounting documents, and usage data from the electronic health records system available on-site.
RESULTSThe annual primary care cost was defined as the estimated financial coverage for eligible employees and their eligible dependents (n=15,051). The annual utilization rate for consultations was reported at 51%. Of patients who consulted, approximately 38% accessed free available diagnostic procedures and 48% availed of free available medicines. Based on these usage rates, the annual primary care cost for the first year was computed at PhP 403.22 per capita.
CONCLUSIONOur study shows that on the first year of coverage in a government run urban outpatient facility, an allocation of PhP 403.22 per capita can allow coverage for a disease-agnostic package (comprehensive); this amount excludes out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the target population of this study. This amount is feasible only when coopted with opportunistic registration, reduction of untargeted check-ups, prior contextual community engagement, and streamlining of patient-transactions through an electronic health record (EHR).
Primary Health Care ; Health Policy ; Healthcare Financing ; Costs And Cost Analysis
3.The cost of primary care: An experience analysis in an urban setting
Mia P. Rey ; Regine Ynez H. De Mesa ; Jose Rafael A. Marfori ; Noleen Marie C. Fabian ; Romelei Camiling-Alfonso ; Ramon Pedro P. Paterno ; Nannette B. Sundiang ; AB Yusoph ; Leonila F. Dans ; Cara Lois T. Galingana ; Ma. Rhodora N. Aquino ; Josephine T. Sanchez ; Jesusa T. Catabui ; Antonio Miguel L. Dans
Acta Medica Philippina 2024;58(Early Access 2024):1-12
Objectives:
PhilHealth’s present health benefit scheme is largely centered on in-patient services. This inadvertently incentivizes hospital admissions for increased access to benefit coverage. To address this problem, this study proposes a costing method to comprehensively finance outpatient care. The objective of this paper is to estimate an annual primary care benefit package (PCBP) cost based on experience analysis (actual benefit usage) on the first year of implementation at an urban pilot site.
Methods:
A cost analysis was conducted to assess a disease-agnostic primary care benefit package for an urban
outpatient government facility over the first year of implementation. Costing information was gathered through staff interviews, accounting documents, and usage data from the electronic health records system available on-site.
Results:
The annual primary care cost was defined as the estimated financial coverage for eligible employees and their eligible dependents (n=15,051). The annual utilization rate for consultations was reported at 51%. Of patients who consulted, approximately 38% accessed free available diagnostic procedures and 48% availed of free available medicines. Based on these usage rates, the annual primary care cost for the first year was computed at PhP 403.22 per capita.
Conclusion
Our study shows that on the first year of coverage in a government run urban outpatient facility, an
allocation of PhP 403.22 per capita can allow coverage for a disease-agnostic package (comprehensive); this amount excludes out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the target population of this study. This amount is feasible only when coopted with opportunistic registration, reduction of untargeted check-ups, prior contextual community engagement, and streamlining of patient-transactions through an electronic health record (EHR).
Healthcare Financing
;
Costs and Cost Analysis
;
Primary Health Care