Background: The internet contains both accurate and false coronavirus-related information. Is the public equipped with electronic health literacy in navigating online material to make informed health decisions? Objective: This study measured Filipino adults’ perceived level of COVID-19-related eHealth literacy, and how this affects their adherence to preventive practices against COVID-19 infection. Methods: In this analytical cross-sectional study, data were collected from 345 adult respondents who were patients, and their companions, consulting in Healthway Family Clinics in Marikina and Rizal. They answered self-administered electronic questionnaires in English or Filipino. The data collection tool was adapted from the Coronavirus-Related eHealth Literacy Scale (CoV-eHEALS) with permission from the authors. Pearson correlation determined the relationship between mean CoV-eHEALS and mean Protective Behavior Adherence (PBA) score. ANOVA determined the relationship of CoV-eHEALS and PBA with sociodemographic variables. Results: Higher Covid-related eHealth literacy is associated with better adherence to protective behaviors against COVID-19. The overall mean CoV-eHEALS is 23.67 while the overall mean PBA score is 3.81 (r=0.32). Younger age, female sex, and high educational attainment are associated with high CoV-eHEALS. Female sex and high educational attainment are associated with high PBA score Conclusion eHealth literacy is essential for COVID-19 awareness since it influences the public‘s engagement in preventive behavior. Sociodemographic variables should be considered in health education, targeting individuals of younger age, male sex, and lower education. Evaluation of the reliability of online sources Filipinos use to gather health-related information is a possible focus for future research.
COVID-19

Introduction: Breast cancer remains to be a public health problem in the Philippines. This study determined the level of breast cancer awareness among female non-medical students from selected private colleges in Quezon City. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional survey, and data collection was done on a single occasion. The study population was chosen via convenience sampling. The survey asked about the respondents' ideas on awareness, beliefs, perceived personal risk, perceived seriousness, and knowledge of etiology, diagnosis and management of breast cancer. Results: Majority of the respondents associated lifestyle factors (smoking) with the development of breast cancer. Four-fifths regarded Western medicine as a mainstay of treatment, however, a significant proportion believed that breast cancer could be adequately managed and controlled with complementary and alternative treatments. Around 25% of respondents considered themselves at risk for breast cancer and 40% did not know. Close to 65% said that family history was a risk factor. Almost 50% never heard of self-breast examination; of those who knew about it, only 15% practiced it monthly. The respondents had varied answers when asked about the common symptoms and signs of breast cancer. At least two-thirds of respondents said that the treatment for breast cancer includes surgery and radiation therapy. Majority (79.8%) opined that having an education program would increase the level of awareness of the general public. Conclusion The students surveyed were generally aware about breast cancer, including aspects of epidemiology, diagnosis and management. The study also a revealed a number of misconceptions regarding breast cancer.
Breast Neoplasms ; Awareness ; Knowledge