BACKGROUND

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF) are rare, chronic autoimmune blistering diseases primarily treated with systemic glucocorticoids. Long-term use of glucocorticoids can result in significant adverse effects, leading to the exploration of steroid-sparing adjuvants. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids alone versus in combination with adjuvants for treating PV and PF.

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of oral glucocorticoids alone versus with steroid-sparing adjuvants in treatment of PV and PF.

METHODS

This research was a systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared systemic glucocorticoids with or without steroid-sparing adjuvants in treating PV and PF. A total of 20 RCTs were included after meeting the inclusion criteria, comprising 1169 patients diagnosed with PV or PF. Primary outcomes were remission rates, while secondary outcomes included relapse rates, disease control, and the occurrence of adverse events.

RESULTS

Studies involving rituximab and cyclophosphamide demonstrated significantly higher remission rates compared to other adjuvants or glucocorticoid monotherapy. Adverse events were common, particularly with high-dose glucocorticoids.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis found that rituximab and cyclophosphamide were superior steroid-sparing adjuvants in the treatment of PV and PF. Other adjuvants, such as azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, also showed efficacy but had a higher incidence of adverse events. Further studies were needed to optimize treatment protocols and reduce long-term complications.

Meta-analysis ; Pemphigus ; Pemphigus Foliaceus ; Pemphigus Vulgaris