BACKGROUND

Scabies, caused by Sarcoptes scabiei var. hominis, is a prevalent and burdensome skin disease in the Philippines, ranking second in disability. Recognized as a neglected tropical disease (NTD) by the WHO, scabies management is targeted for inclusion in universal healthcare programs worldwide by 2030. Current treatment involves topical neurotoxic drugs like permethrin, but issues such as expense and inconvenience hinder compliance. Oral ivermectin, recommended by the WHO only recently, is more cost-effective and easier to administer but is considered a second-line option in clinical practice guidelines. This research aimed to determine the comparative efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with topical permethrin, versus topical permethrin alone, in the treatment of classic scabies among Filipino patients.

METHODS

This 4-part study was conducted from July 2021 to September 2023 and aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness, and acceptability of oral ivermectin alone or in combination with topical permethrin versus topical permethrin alone for treating classic scabies among Filipino patients. Quantitative methods included a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 38 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a pharmacoeconomic evaluation using decision tree modeling. Qualitative methods involved a multiple case study of patient experiences and perceptions and in-depth interviews with physicians.

RESULTS

There seems to be comparable efficacy between oral ivermectin and permethrin, with limited evidence favoring the combination ivermectin/permethrin regimen. Adverse events were minor, and cost-effectiveness analyses favored ivermectin-based regimens over permethrin. Patient and physician perspectives supported the effectiveness of all treatments, with oral ivermectin recognized as safe but underutilized.

CONCLUSION

Evidence synthesis suggests that oral ivermectin, especially in combination with permethrin, could be a viable and cost-effective alternative for scabies treatment in the Philippines. The optimal dosing regimen, safety in specific populations, and factors influencing treatment choice need further exploration. Recommendations include advocating for oral ivermectin inclusion in regulatory guidelines and national formulary, considering it as a first- or second- line treatment, and conducting further research, including mixed-methods designs, to confirm efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness in different settings. Shared decision-making, considering ethical, logistical, socioeconomic, and psychological aspects, is crucial in implementing effective scabies control programs.

Ivermectin ; Permethrin ; Scabies

BACKGROUND

With the utility of nail dermoscopy to supplement the diagnosis of onychomycosis, studies have been done in describing common findings. However, most of these were based in Europe and the Americas. Given the geographical variation of onychomycosis, a local study is needed.

OBJECTIVE

The general objective of this cross-sectional study is to determine the different patterns among the clinical subtypes of laboratory diagnosed onychomycosis patients seen at the Philippine General Hospital (PGH).

METHODOLOGY

Clinically suspected Filipino onychomycosis patients seen at the PGH - Department of Dermatology, and at the PGH inpatient wards were recruited. All patients underwent the following: direct KOH microscopy, fungal culture studies, and nail clipping with PAS staining.

RESULTS

A total of 75 samples were included; 93.33% of the samples were categorized as DLSO subtype, 5.33% as TDO, and 1.33% as PSO. The three most common onychoscopic patterns were subungual hyperkeratosis (93.33%), chromonychia (85.33%), and longitudinal striae in 81.33%. KOH was positive in 57.33% of the cases, cultures in 38.67% and PAS stain in 80%. Onychoscopic pattern was not associated with clinical type of onychomycosis and causative organism. Negative KOH result was associated with linear edges (p=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with clinical and laboratory diagnosed onychomycosis, linear edges and jagged proximal edges were associated with negative KOH microscopy and fungal CS, respectively. Hence, in situations where such examinations are negative despite a strong clinical suspicion of onychomycosis, the above onychoscopic findings can be used for empirical diagnosis.

Human ; Culture ; Onychomycosis ; Potassium Hydroxide

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Oral ivermectin, a broad-spectrum anti-parasitic drug, alone or in combination with permethrin, may be a cheaper and more convenient alternative drug to topical permethrin alone in the treatment of classic scabies. There are no previous studies on the treatment acceptability of the three interventions among individual patients with scabies in the Philippines. The purpose of this study was to understand the experiences and perceptions on treatment acceptability for oral ivermectin, topical permethrin or combination treatment among patients with scabies using the multiple-case study approach.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative multiple case study among adult Filipino patients with classic scabies who were prescribed oral ivermectin, topical permethrin or its combination at a government tertiary hospital dermatology outpatient clinic from December 2022 to September 2023. Semi-structured interviews were used as the primary source of data and analyzed together with chart reviews, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, and clinical images. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and triangulated with other secondary data. A three-person research team employed a reflexive and iterative process of familiarization, coding, and thematic analysis using a modified Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to generate case descriptions, within-case analyses, and cross-case syntheses.

RESULTS

The acceptability of scabies treatments (permethrin, ivermectin, and combination therapy) was generally positive. Permethrin, used in three patient cases, was generally perceived as effective but itch relief varied. The burden of whole-body application of permethrin was context-dependent, influenced by living arrangements and family support. Perceived affordability of permethrin was linked to socioeconomic status. Ivermectin, used by one patient case, was perceived as highly effective with no side effects. Its single dose use did not interfere with patient routine. Combination therapy was also considered effective but potential antagonistic effects and the cost of adding permethrin made it less preferred. Reluctance in taking oral pills was noted. All patients valued medical advice and deferred to their physicians for treatment decisions.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

All three treatment options were considered effective and safe. Patients generally preferred permethrin over oral ivermectin due to its topical nature and perceived lower side effects. However, affordability and logistical challenges, especially for large households and low-income families, were noted with permethrin. Oral ivermectin elicited hesitation due to its controversial role in COVID-19 and veterinary use. Concerns about added costs and potential antagonism in combination therapy were raised. Despite these considerations, patients ultimately relied on physicians for treatment decisions. This study underscores the importance of understanding patient perspectives, experiences, and the patient-physician relationship in choosing scabies interventions. Addressing patient concerns, providing education, and ensuring ease of use and affordability can enhance treatment acceptability and adherence for better outcomes.

Human ; Scabies ; Ivermectin ; Permethrin ; Case Study ; Case Reports ; Qualitative Research

Background and Objective: Oral ivermectin is recommended as an alternative to topical permethrin in Japanese, European, and CDC-STI guidelines for treating classic scabies. The combination of oral ivermectin and topical permethrin is also used in some settings. Partial economic evaluations conducted in India and Egypt have conflicting results, and no cost-effectiveness analysis in the Philippines has compared ivermectin-based regimens to permethrin for scabies treatment. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin, compared to permethrin, in the treatment of Filipino adult patients with classic scabies. Methods: We used a decision tree model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of two regimens, oral ivermectin alone or in combination with permethrin, compared with permethrin to treat adults and children aged five years and older with classic scabies in the outpatient setting from the household perspective in the Philippines. We estimated total costs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over a one-month follow-up. Input parameters were obtained from secondary data, such as effect estimates for probabilities of clinical outcomes from a network meta-analysis, DALYs from the Global Burden of Disease 2019, and prevailing market cost in the Philippines (DPRI 2022 with recommended markup by DOH, and leading drugstores) as of August 2022. We computed for incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and net monetary benefit (NMB) to determine which of the interventions are cost-effective. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the impact of parameter and structural uncertainty. Results: Ivermectin-based regimens are suggested to be likely cost-saving compared to permethrin in the Philippine outpatient setting. Base case analysis showed that oral ivermectin had higher cost-savings (change in cost, -1,039.31; change in DALYS, 0.00027), while combination oral ivermectin/permethrin had higher DALYs averted (change in cost, PhP -1,019.78; change in DALYs, 0.00045), compared to permethrin. Combination oral ivermectin/permethrin (56%) was the most cost-effective, followed by oral ivermectin (44%) compared to permethrin (0%) through probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Estimates for ivermectin were sensitive to risk of cure for ivermectin vs permethrin using 1-way deterministic sensitivity analysis. Oral ivermectin was favored over combination oral ivermectin/permethrin at all thresholds based on the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. Conclusion Both ivermectin-based regimens seem to be cost-saving compared to permethrin in the treatment of classic scabies in the Philippine outpatient setting. Clinicians may consider oral ivermectin, alone or in combination with permethrin as an alternative first-line or second-line treatment depending on patient preference, adverse event risk profile, availability, and economic capacity. This needs to be confirmed using primary data from Filipino patients to enhance the robustness of the findings and support evidence-based local decision-making in different settings. Less uncertainty in modelled parameters can give greater confidence in the results, which can be adopted for budget impact analysis and allow more rational resource allocation. Value of information analysis can be done to determine whether the expense of future RCTs or surveys in Filipinos to collect primary data is worth it. The cost of reducing uncertainty, if deemed worth the cost of further studies, may facilitate population-level decision-making and budget planning. Findings may further inform practice guideline development, coverage decisions, and national control program planning by providing the most cost-effective scabies intervention.
Scabies ; Ivermectin ; Permethrin ; Cost-Benefit Analysis