3.A comparative study on the changes in pain threshold resulting from "exercise" work load and acupuncture anaesthesia.
Akira KAWACHI ; Sumie TOYOTA ; Toshikatsu KITADE ; Masazumi MINAMIKAWA ; Masao MATSUO ; Masaru NITTA ; Zaigen WAN ; Ryuichiro KATSURAGAWA ; Eriko MIMAYA ; Francisco ROZANO ; Masayoshi HYODO
Journal of the Japan Society of Acupuncture and Moxibustion 1987;37(2):75-79
In this research we conducted a comparative study on the pain threshold elevation resulting from “exercise” work loads, ie. running and cycling, and acupuncture anaesthesia. 10 subjects participated throughout our research; whereas, additional subjects only participated in selected experiments. It was found that the pain threshold increased for both exercise work load and acupuncture anaesthesia; however, no significant correlation was found between the pain threshold elevation percentages resulting from exercise work load and acupuncture anaesthesia.
Therefore we propose, although it has been ascertained that the elevation of pain threshold involves the endomorphin mechanism, that there must be other important mechanisms involved as well.
4.The analgesic effect of laser-puncture on painful diseases.
Sumie TOYOTA ; Akira KAWACHI ; Masao MATSUO ; Tetsuya KIMURA ; Masaru NITTA ; Yukio SAKO ; Tomoko SHINAGAWA ; Masae TANAKA ; Kazuhiro MORIKAWA ; Sawako HASHIMOTO ; Toshikatsu KITADE ; Mitsuru NAKAMURA ; Tatsuzo NAKAMURA ; Fuminori ANDO ; Takao SAKAI ; Sakiko KITANI ; Toyohiko INOUE ; Masayoshi HYODO
Journal of the Japan Society of Acupuncture and Moxibustion 1986;36(1):42-47
A statistical study on effects of laser-puncture was carried out. In addition, an attempt was made to compare between the effect of acupuncture and this method. The treatments were under-taken for various chronic and acute cases with pain. In the laser-puncture treatment, two types of laser (i, e. low energy 10mW laser and 70mW sharp laser) were used. Laser-beam was given to 20-30 points which were located in painful areas, innervating nerve areas and remote areas for 40 sec for each.
In the open study, 10mW laser-puncture was effective (including ‘rather effective’) in 64% of the cases, and 70mW laser-puncture 73%. In the blind test, ‘the day’ evaluation showed that the laser-punctures were more effective than placebo treatment: 10mW laser-puncture was effective in 80% of the cases, and placebo in 67%. 70mW laser-puncture was effective in 87% of them, and placebo in 80%. In situ acupuncture was effective in 97%, and no effect was seen in 7%.
Only ‘the day’ evaluation in the open study showed that 70mW laser-puncture was more effective than 10mW one. In the blind best, 10mW and 70mW laser-puncture were more effective than placebo, and in situ acupuncture was more effective than the laser-punctures, but there were no significant differences among the three treatmets.