1.Thalassaemia: A Study on The Perception of Patients and Family Members
J Abdul Wahab ; M Naznin ; M Z Nora ; A R Suzanah ; M Zulaiha ; A R Aidil Faszrul ; W S Kamaruzaman
The Medical Journal of Malaysia 2011;66(4):326-334
Marked improvement in the management of thalassaemia
has not been matched by progress in psychosocial
rehabilitation as thalassaemia continues to pose challenges
to patients and their family members. Few studies have been
carried out in Malaysia to look at such issues. This study is therefore to explore the concerns, beliefs and feelings about thalassaemia. It was conducted in the year 2009 over 7 months on “focus groups”, in patients aged 8-22 years and
parents attending Paediatric Clinic of Tengku Ampuan Afzan
Hospital, Kuantan, Pahang. Results showed that concerns
and adverse impact were related to lower grades in
education, poor self-image, less chance of employment,
marriage, financial burden and social integration.
Compliance to subcutaneous iron chelator was poor. There
were various concerns related to blood transfusion therapy.
It is evident that thalassaemia greatly affects the
psychosocial dimensions and a more structured long term
psychosocial support is needed to improve quality of life of patients.
2.Agriculture wastes conversion for biofertilizer production using beneficial microorganisms for sustainable agriculture applications
Siti Zulaiha Hanapi ; Hassan M. Awad ; Sheikh Imranudin Sheikh Ali ; Siti Hajar Mat Sarip ; Mohamad Roji Sarmidi ; Ramlan Aziz
Malaysian Journal of Microbiology 2013;9(1):60-67
Aims: The emphasis of this study is to generate new valuable bioproducts from non-toxic cleaning waste for
environmental healing technology.
Methodology and Results: Comparisons between different types of biofertilizer formulations and the field trial
effectiveness were done. Results indicated that biofertilizer C contained the highest N value (1.8%) when compared with biofertilizers B and A, which only contained 1.7% and 1.4%, respectively. Biofertilizer A showed significant difference in the total count of yeast, mould, ammonia oxidizing bacteria and nitrate oxidizing bacteria compared to biofertilizer B and
C. Meanwhile, biofertilizer C was found to be significantly different from others in Lactobacillus sp. and nitrogen-fixing bacteria count. Photosynthetic total count and Actinomycetes sp. were not noticed in all formulations tested.
Conclusion, significance and impact of study: The findings of this study suggest that biofertilizer A is suitable to be used as a promotional biofertilizer in flower and fruit production, biofertilizer B can be used for a leafy crop, while biofertilizer C is good for the growth of roots and stem of plants.