Objective To evaluate the reasonability and feasibility of evaluation index system for the Capital Research Fund for Medical Development in order to provide some preliminary practical and theo-retical fundamentals for setting up and improving an evaluation index system for the Capital Research Foun-dation for Medical Development. Methods Based on the investigation of thirty three hospital's administra-tors in Beijing,we used statistical methods to evaluate the reliability and validity of the evaluation index sys-tem. Results The first grade and second grade index were approved by more than 87.88% responders;the half-reliability of the evaluation index system was 0.7933 and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient is 0.9103, the factor analysis of the second grade indicators showed that there were four factors extracted, and the accu-mulative variance reached 78.44%. Conclusion The evaluation index system for the Capital Research Fund for Medical Development is reasonable and feasible,and the research result will provide a basis for fur-ther study.

ObjectiveTo explore the application of the Structure Equation Model on validity assessment of the evaluation indicator system,we studied Medical Capital Development Fund projects in 2007 to evaluate their construct validity.MethodsPart of the evaluation results (1200 items) were divided into two parts randomly.PART1 was used for Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to explore the Indicator System' structure,and formed model F1.Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to assess the construct validity of model F1.With considerations of Modification Index(MI) and reality,F1 was modified into F3.At last,we take PART2 as the sample to confirm F3.ResultThe results of model F3 fit indices showed a better fit.All the path coefficients,estimated load factors and other parameters were statistically significant.ConclusionStructural Equation Model is professional,reliable and satisfactory for the evaluation of indicator system's contract validity.

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the written project approval Indexes System of Capital Medical Ddevelopment Research Foundation.We analyzed the approval results of application projects and proposed measures to improve the index system.Methods We evaluated its reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficient,split-half reliability; validity was evaluated with contract validity and content validity,discrimination was studies according to discretion grouping law,and feasibility was studied with the percentage-of-completion method.Results ① Reliability:Cronbach's alpha coefficient of factor and total scores'and split-half reliability were all over 0.80.②Contract validity:the standard factor loading coefficients of the index system were over 0.70 (range:0.57～0.86),indicating path performed well.All factor loading coefficients were statistical significant (T-values were 30.49～54.25,all were over 1.96).Fit Indexes (RMSEA =0.065、NNFI =0.99、IFI =0.99、CFI =0.99、GFI =0.95、AGFI =0.93、X2 =1028.21、X2/DF =11.82) indicated the system's goodness of fit was good.③ Content validity:Scale-level CVI,S-CVI was 0.97 and Interrater agreement was 0.93,over 0.90,which indicated that indexes system's whole Content validity performed well.Except for the item Academic thought item-level CVI being 0.57 all items' item-level CVI were 1.00.④Discrimination:Discrimination index of every primary index,secondary index and total score ranged from 0.51 to 0.76 (all were over 0.40),meaning that discrimination performed extremely well.Conclusion The indexes system's reliability,contract validity,content validity and discrimination conformed to the actual application projects appraisal results.

In order to study the the impact of cognitive difference between doctors and patients on doctor-patient relationship, five tertiary hospitals in city B were investigated with questionnaire and quantitative interviews, and the outcomes were analyzed with SPSS16. 0 software. Cognitive differences were found in the nature of the relationship, the main part of responsibility for the relationship, and principles for communication between the parties. By analyzing the causes of the difference and their impact on the relationship, it draw the conclusion that this cognitive difference found between the two parties functions as a key to the conflicts between doctors and patients. Return of health care back to non-profit nature, encouragement of patient-doctor communication and mutual understanding will be conducive to minimizing such a cognitive difference, and building a harmonious doctor-patient relationship.