Objective To investigate the risk factors of nosocomial infections in patients with head and neck cancer during radiotherapy .Methods Clinical data of 189 patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy in Huzhou Central Hospital during August 2011 and December 2014 were retrospectively studied .Chi-square test and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were performed to explore the risk factors of nosocomial infections in patients during radiotherapy .Results Among 189 patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy , nosocomial infection was observed in 64 (33.86%) patients.Univariate analysis showed that radiation-induced oral mucositis (χ2 =11.47, P<0.01), underlying disease (χ2 =6.59, P<0.05), stage of tumor Ⅲ-Ⅳ (χ2 =4.36, P<0.05), whole-neck radiation (χ2 =7.64, P <0.05), dose of radiation ≥50 Gy(χ2 =8.92, P <0.05), combined chemotherapy (χ2 =6.53, P<0.01), invasive operation (χ2 =4.21, P<0.05), PS score=1 (χ2 =3.58, P<0.05) and low body mass index (χ2 =9.56, P <0.05) were risk factors of nosocomial infections . Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that radiation-induced oral mucositis ( OR=3.46, χ2 =8.72, P<0.01),underlying disease (OR=1.91, χ2 =4.66, P<0.05), stage of tumor Ⅲ-Ⅳ (OR=2.01,χ2 =5.22, P<0.05), whole-neck radiation (OR=1.78,χ2 =4.89, P<0.05), dose of radiation ≥50 Gy (OR=1.69,χ2 =3.25, P<0.05), combined chemotherapy (OR=1.84, χ2 =6.91, P<0.05) and low body mass index (OR=1.53, χ2 =2.59, P<0.05) were independent risk factors of nosocomial infection.Conclusions Nosocomial infections are popular in patients with head and neck cancer during radiotherapy.Radiation-induced oral mucositis, underlying disease, stage of tumor, radiation field, dose of radiation, combined chemotherapy and body mass index are associated with the occurrence of nosocomial infections in these patients .

Objective To analyze the related risk factors of re-nonunion after primary revision for femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing. Methods A retrospective study was performed in 61 patients with femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing from June 2008 to June.All patients were divided into re-nonunion group(22 cases)and non-re-nonunion group (39 cases) according to diagnostic criteria of bone re-nonunion. Univariate analysis was used to analyze 14 factors that may lead to the occurrence of re-nonunion after revision for femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol abuse, injury reason, fracture types, intramedullary nail types, locking screws technology for intramedullary nail, bone nonunion sites, bone nonunion time, pathological types of bone nonunion, primary revision methods and autologous bone graft or not, and multi-factor logistic regression analysis was performed on the factors showing a significant difference. Results Univariate analysis showed significant difference in smoking (χ2= 6.564, P = 0.036), BMI (χ2= 6.783, P = 0.021), bone nonunion sites(χ2=7.316,P=0.011),primary revision methods(χ2=8.069,P=0.003)and autologous bone graft or not(χ 2=6.668,P=0.027).Logistic regression analysis showed that primary revision methods(OR=1.027,95% CI 0.028-0.463,P<0.05)and autologous bone graft or not(OR=1.024,95% CI 0.006-0.363, P < 0.05) were independent risk factors for re-nonunion after revision of femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing. Conclusions Primary revision methods and autologous bone graft or not are independent risk factors for re-nonunion after revision of femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing.By strictly controlling the surgical indications and combining with autogenous bone grafting,it is possible to reduce the occurrence of nonunion after primary revision of the femoral shaft nonunion subsequent to failed intramedullary nailing.

Objective To explore the effect of primary exchange reamed nailing (ERN) and augmentation compression plating (ACP) combined with autogenous bone grafting (ABG) on health-related quality of life in patients with dystrophic or atrophic nonunion of femoral shaft after intramedullary nailing. Methods The study used a prospective study method. Sixty- two patients with femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing from August 2010 to October 2016 were selected, and the patients were divided into ERN group (group A, 32 cases) and ACP group (group B, 30 cases) by random digits table method. In group A, isthmus nonunion was in 18 cases (56.2％), and non-isthmus nonunion in 14 cases (43.8％); in group B, isthmus nonunion was in 16 cases (53.3％), and non-isthmus nonunion in 14 cases (46.7％ ). The health- related quality of life was compared between 2 groups, including physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) in the- 12- item short form health survey (SF- 12), brief pain inventory- severity (BPI- S) and brief pain inventory- interference (BPI- I). Results Fifty-four patients were followed-up for more than 1 year, and the mean follow-up time was 18.3 (13 to 37) months. All patients successfully achieved bone union, and the mean time was 5.8 (4 to 8) months. Significant improvements in terms of SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS score were noted after operation for patients with isthmus nonunion in both groups (t=3.148, 2.156, 2.456 and 2.559; P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences before and after operation in group A with non-isthmus nonunion (P >0.05). At the last follow-up, SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS in group B were significantly improved compared with those in group A: (45.2 ± 5.8) scores vs. (33.6 ± 4.7) scores and (48.8 ± 6.5) scores vs. (39.4 ± 5.6) scores, and there were statistical difference (P<0.05); SF-12 BPI-S and BPI-I showed obvious relief: (4.6 ± 2.1) scores vs. (6.2 ± 2.5) scores and (5.2 ± 1.9) scores vs. (6.8 ± 2.7) scores, and there were statistical differences (P<0.05); however there were no statistical difference in SF-12 PCS, SF-12 MCS, BPI-S and BPI- I between 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Compared with ERN combined with ABG, ACP combined with ABG can significantly improve the quality of life in patients with dystrophic or atrophic nonunion of femoral shaft after intramedullary nailing. It has greater advantage on the improvement of health-related quality of life, especially for patients with non-isthmus nonunion.