1.The mechanisms of growth and metastasis inhibition on colorectal adenoma cells by sulindac
Shumei LIU ; Liwen GENG ; Guoyin SHANG ; Tao LIANG
Journal of Chinese Physician 2008;10(4):508-510
Objective To investigate the effects and mechanisms of sulindac, a non-selective cyclooxygenase(COX)inhibitor, on the proliferation and apoptosis of colorectal cancer cell line HT-29.Methods HT-29 cells were treated with sulindac. MTT assay and flow cytometry were used to measure the proliferation and apoptosis respectively. The laser scanning microscope(LSM)and the fluorescence microscope were used to observe apoptosis of the cells, and the flow cytometry (FCM)analysis was used to observe the cell apoptosis and cell cycle. Results Sulindac inhibited the cells proliferation and induced apoptosis in a dose-and time-dependent manner. With the TUNEL staining and fluorescence microscope, we found that the apoptosis cell became brown. After the Annexin V/PI staining, we observed that the membrane of apoptosis cells became green with LSM; the nucleosidase became red or crocus. FCM showed that sulindac promoted apoptosis of the cells, made the stage of G0/G1 ceils significantly reduced. Conclusions Our results showed that sulindac may inhibit the proliferation and induced the apoptosis of colon cancer cell HT-29,and the mechanism may probably be related to cell cycle arrest.
2.Long-term Efficiency of Percutaneous Transluminal Septal Myocardial Ablation for Treating the Patients With Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
Liwen LIU ; Xingxing LI ; Ruoxi GU ; Xiaozeng WANG ; Quanmin JING ; Geng WANG ; Xin ZHAO ; Yaling HAN
Chinese Circulation Journal 2015;(8):757-761
Objective: To evaluate the long-term efifciency of percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation (PTSMA) for treating the patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM).
Methods: A total of 66/94 (70.2%) HOCM patients received PTSMA in Shenyang PLA general hospital from 2001-10 to 2012-10 were retrospectively studied. The left ventricular out lfow gradient (LVOFG) was measured at before and after the operation, ECG and echocardiography were examined at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after operation, and then examined once per year for (63.8±28.5) months.
Results: There were 26 patients lost contact during follow-up period, 40 returned to routine clinical check-up and 2 patients died thereafter, 1 because of sudden death and 1 because of cerebral bleeding. The pre-operative average LVOTG was (102.7 ± 47.5) mmHg, compared with the values at 6 months post-operation and long term (>6 months) after operation (33.9 ± 30.2) mmHg and (29.7 ± 25.4) mmHg,P<0.001. The pre-operative average inter ventricular septal (IVS) was (20.1 ± 3.6) mm, compared with the values at 6 months post-operation and long term after operation (17.5 ± 2.9) mm and (16.4 ± 3.6) mm, P=0.028 andP<0.001. There were 7 patients with NYHA class at II-III and having occasional chest suppression and short of breath. There were no heart transplantation, frequent premature ventricular contraction, tachycardia and other malignant arrhythmia occurred in 38 survivors.
Conclusion: PTSMA may reduce LVOTG, IVS thickness and improve the clinical symptoms in HOCM patients, the long-term efifcacy is reliable.
3. An interlaboratory comparison study on the detection of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion transcript levels and WT1 transcript levels
Yazhen QIN ; Liwen ZHU ; Shuang LIN ; Suxia GENG ; Shengwei LIU ; Hui CHENG ; Chengye WU ; Min XIAO ; Xiaoqing LI ; Ruiping HU ; Lili WANG ; Haiyan LIU ; Daoxin MA ; Tao GUAN ; Yuanxin YE ; Ting NIU ; Jiannong CEN ; Lisha LU ; Li SUN ; Tonghua YANG ; Yungui WANG ; Tao LI ; Yue WANG ; Qinghua LI ; Xiaosu ZHAO ; Lingdi LI ; Wenmin CHEN ; Lingyu LONG ; Xiaojun HUANG
Chinese Journal of Hematology 2019;40(11):889-894
Objective:
To investigate the current status and real performance of the detection of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion transcript levels and WT1 transcript levels in China through interlaboratory comparison.
Methods:
Peking University People’s Hospital (PKUPH) prepared the samples for comparison. That is, the fresh RUNX1-RUNX1T1 positive (+) bone morrow nucleated cells were serially diluted with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 negative (-) nucleated cells from different patients. Totally 23 sets with 14 different samples per set were prepared. TRIzol reagent was added in each tube and thoroughly mixed with cells for homogenization. Each laboratory simultaneously tested RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and WT1 transcript levels of one set of samples by real-time quantitative PCR method. All transcript levels were reported as the percentage of RUNX1-RUNX1T1 or WT1 transcript copies/ABL copies. Spearman correlation coefficient between the reported transcript levels of each participated laboratory and those of PKUPH was calculated.
Results:
①RUNX1-RUNX1T1 comparison: 9 samples were (+) and 5 were (-) , the false negative and positive rates of the 20 participated laboratories were 0 (0/180) and 5% (5/100) , respectively. The reported transcript levels of all 9 positive samples were different among laboratories. The median reported transcript levels of 9 positive samples were from 0.060% to 176.7%, which covered 3.5-log. The ratios of each sample’s highest to the lowest reported transcript levels were from 5.5 to 12.3 (one result which obviously deviated from other laboratories’ results was not included) , 85% (17/20) of the laboratories had correlation coefficient ≥0.98. ②WT1 comparison: The median reported transcript levels of all 14 samples were from 0.17% to 67.6%, which covered 2.6-log. The ratios of each sample’s highest to the lowest reported transcript levels were from 5.3-13.7, 62% (13/21) of the laboratories had correlation coefficient ≥0.98. ③ The relative relationship of the reported RUNX1-RUNX1T1 transcript levels between the participants and PKUPH was not always consistent with that of WT1 transcript levels. Both RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and WT1 transcript levels from 2 and 7 laboratories were individually lower than and higher than those of PKUPH, whereas for the rest 11 laboratories, one transcript level was higher than and the other was lower than that of PKUPH.
Conclusion
The reported RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and WT1 transcript levels were different among laboratories for the same sample. Most of the participated laboratories reported highly consistent result with that of PKUPH. The relationship between laboratories of the different transcript levels may not be the same.