Objective To explore the therapeutic effect of combined endoscopic embelization and variceal ligation (EVL) for management in cirrhotic patients with gastroesophageal variceal bleeding. Meth-otis One hundred and fifty-six cases of active gastric fundal variceal bleeding combined with esophageal var-ices of over degree Ⅱ, and with other causes leading to upper digestive tract bleeding excluded, were ran-domized into therapeutic group (n = 80) and control group (n = 76). For the therapeutic group, endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for embelization of gastric fundal varices and EVL for esophageal varices were per-formed simultaneously. For the control group, EVL was performed 2 months after embolization. Results There was no complication in beth groups. The rate of hemostasis in therapy group was 96. 3% (77/80), and that in control group was 97. 4% (74/76, P >0.05). There was significant difference between two groups, regarding the rates of early re-bleeding [6. 4% (5/78) vs 21.3% (16/75), P < 0. 05] and re-bleeding at 6 months [13.0% (9/69) vs 25. 4% (17/67), P < 0. 05]. There was no significant difference between two groups, regarding the effective rate in disappearance of gastric fundus varices (61.6% vs 59. 1%), and in that of esophageal varices (74. 0% vs 67.9%). Conclusion Endescopic embelisation of gastric fundus vaxices, combined with EVL for esophageal varices, is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, and it can reduce the rate of re- bleeding.

Objective To evaluate gastric varices embolization by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Methods One hundred and eighty-five hepatic cirrhosis patients complicated with gastric varices were divided into two groups, the EUS group, 109 patients and the control group, 76 patients. Ninty-nine patients with confirmed gastric varices by EUS in the EUS group were treated by Histoacryl. All of the patients were examined by EUS soon after the embolization and at three months later. While 76 cases confirmed by endoscopy in the control group were treated by Histoacryl who only examined by EUS three months later. Results The rate of hemostasic both were 100% and rebleeding never occurred within three weeks in EUS group while the rate of the early rebleeding in the control group was 11. 8% (9/76). There was significant difference between the two groups (P

Objective: To understand the prevalence of dyslipidemia and risk factors among coal miners under different work conditions. Methods: The survey was conducted from April 2016 to June 2016. 759 mine workers were divided into three groups (group of the front line miner, underground auxiliary and ground) . Questionnaire and physical examination were used to collect related information of workers. Logistic regression model was used to analyze relative factors. Results: The overall prevalence of dyslipidemia was 43.2% in coal miners. The prevalence rate of the front line miner and underground auxiliary miners was 46.6%. Ground workers had the lowest prevalence rate of 36.4%. Multiple Logistic regression analysis showed that higher body mass index (BMI) was risk factors for underground workers (OR=2.18, 95%CI:1.51~3.13) . Smoking (OR=1.99, 95%CI:1.17~3.38) , drinking (OR=1.85, 95%CI:1.11~3.06) , hypertension (OR=1.79, 95%CI:1.00~3.22) and higher waist and hip ratio (OR=1.06, 95%CI:1.04~1.09) were risk factors for underground auxiliary workers. For ground workers, those with higher BMI (OR=2.64, 95%CI:1.68~4.16) were at higher risk of dyslipidemia and female workers had lower risk (OR=0.35, 95%CI:0.18~0.65) than male workers. Conclusion The dyslipidemia rate of coal mine workers is related to work environment and behavior. Health education may be needed to reduce the dyslipidemia rate of coal mine workers.