1.Displaced Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children – Are They All Identical?
Gera Sk, Ms Orth, Tan Mch, Mbbs, Lim Yg, Mrcs Ed, Lim Kbl, Frcsed Orth
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2017;11(2):40-44
Introduction: This study aims to ascertain if there are any
differences in supracondylar fractures between children
under seven years of age and those above 7 years of age.
Materials and Methods: All cases of displaced humerus
supracondylar fractures that required surgical stabilization
were identified and retrospectively reviewed. Demographic
data, mode of injury, associated neurovascular injuries and
details of surgery performed were obtained from clinical
records. The Gartland classification and the extent of
comminution of fractures were also documented from review
of radiographs.
Results: One hundred and twelve children were included in
this study, of whom 61 (54.46%) were younger than seven
years of age while 51 (45.5%) were aged seven years or
older. Children aged seven or older had a greater incidence
of associated neurological deficit at presentation (p=0.046).
Of the six patients with nerve injury in the older age group,
one patient (16.7%) had a radial nerve injury, two patients
(33.3%) had ulnar nerve injuries while another two patients
(33.3%) had median nerve injuries. There was one patient
(16.7%) with both median and ulnar nerve injuries.
Comminuted fractures were also more common in the older
children (p=0.004). No significant differences were
demonstrated between the groups with regard to age, gender
and mechanism of injury, laterality, incidence of open
fracture, vascular injuries and operative time.
Conclusion: Children aged seven years or older who sustain
supracondylar humeral fractures tend to get more
comminuted fractures. There is also a higher incidence of
associated neurological injury. These cases must be carefully
examined for at presentation and parents need to be
appropriately counselled about them.
2.Can Paediatric Femoral Fracture Hip Spica Application be Done in the Outpatient Setting?
Yap ST ; Lee NKL ; Ang ML ; Chui RW ; Lim KBL ; Arjandas M ; Wong KPL
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2021;15(No.1):105-112
children with femur fractures. This study compares the
outcomes of spica cast application, in terms of quality of
fracture reduction and hospital charges when performed in
operating theatre versus outpatient clinics at a local
institution.
Materials and Methods: A total of 93 paediatric patients,
aged between 2 months to 8 years, who underwent spica
casting for an isolated femur fracture between January 2008
and March 2019, were identified retrospectively. They were
separated into inpatient or outpatient cohort based on the
location of spica cast application. Five patients with
metaphyseal fractures and four with un-displaced fractures
were excluded. There were 13 and 71 patients in the
outpatient and inpatient cohort respectively who underwent
spica casting for their diaphyseal and displaced femur
fractures. Variables between cohorts were compared.
Results: There were no significant differences in gender,
fracture pattern, and mechanism of injury between cohorts.
Spica casting as inpatients delayed the time from assessment
to casting (23.55 ± 29.67h vs. 6.75 ± 4.27h, p<0.05),
increased average hospital stay (41.2 ± 31.1h vs. 19.2 ±
15.0h, p<0.05) and average hospital charges (US$1857.14 vs
US$775.49, p<0.05). Excluding the un-displaced fractures,
there were no significant differences in the period of cast
immobilisation and median follow-up length. Both cohorts
had a similar proportion of unacceptable reduction and
revision casting rate.
Conclusion: Both cohorts presented similar spica casting
outcomes of fracture reduction and follow-up period. With
spica cast application in operating theatre reporting higher
hospital charges and prolonged hospital stay, the outpatient
clinic should always be considered for hip spica application.
3.Do We Ever Need to Fix Clavicle Fractures in Adolescents?
Lim KBL ; Olandres RA ; Cheow X ; Thng M ; Teo NMHZ ; Pereira N ; Chan PXE ; Lee NKL
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2023;17(No.3):33-41
Introduction: Clavicle fractures in adults are increasingly
being treated by surgical fixation following reports of
symptomatic non-union, malunion and poor functional
outcome with conservative treatment. This has led to a
similar trend in the management of clavicle fractures in
adolescents. This study aims to evaluate the outcome and
complications of non-operatively treated clavicle fractures in
adolescents.
Materials and methods: This is a retrospective, single
institution study on adolescents aged 13-17 years who
sustained a closed, isolated clavicle fracture, between 1997-
2015. Clinical records were reviewed for demographic
information, injury mode, time to radiographic fracture
union, time to re-attainment of full shoulder range of motion
(ROM), and time to return to full activities and sports.
Complications and fracture-related issues were recorded.
Radiographs were analysed for fracture location,
displacement and shortening.
Results: A total of 115 patients (98 males, 17 females; mean
age:13.9 ± 0.89 years) were included for study. 101 (88%)
sustained a middle-third fracture while the remainder
sustained a lateral-third fracture. A total of 96 (95%) of the
middle-third fractures were displaced, and 12 (86%) of the
lateral-third fractures were displaced. All displaced fractures
in this study had shortening. Sports-related injuries and falls
accounted for 68 (59%) and 34 (30%) of the cases
respectively. Overall, the mean time to radiographic fracture
union was 7.8 ± 4.35 weeks; there were no cases of nonunion. Full shoulder ROM was re-attained in 6.6 ± 3.61
weeks, and full activities and sports was resumed in 11.4 ±
4.69 weeks. There were 5 cases of re-fracture and a single
case of intermittent fracture site pain.
Conclusion: Clavicle fractures in adolescents can and
should be treated non-operatively in the first instance with
the expectation of good outcomes in terms of time for
fracture union, reattainment of shoulder full range of motion,
and return to activities. Surgical stabilisation should be
reserved for cases for which there is an absolute indication.