The combination of laparoscopy and gastroscopy makes up the defects of each of them when used alone, and further extends the application range of minimally invasive techniques. A 53-year-old patient with gastric stromal tumor was admitted to the Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University on March 4, 2011. The result of gastroscopy showed that the tumor was at anterior wall of stomach with a size of 3.0 cm×3.5 cm. the result of CT scan preliminarily diagnosed the patient with gastric stromal tumor. Partial gastrectomy with laparoscopy combined with gastroscopy was applied to the patient on March 9, 2011. The operation time was 32 minutes and the blood loss was 10 ml. The duration of hospital stay was 4 days, and no postoperative complication occurred. Laparoscopy combined with gastroscopy for the treatment of gastric stromal tumor is feasible and safe with a favorable short-term outcome.

As multidrug resistance related genes and cell factors are discovered one after another,people have a more thorough understanding to the oncological mechanisms of cancer metastasis.Many evidences of the inherent link between the two tips have been found.These researches provide new ideas to further clarify the regulation mechanisms between them.It is revealed that the inherent link maybe occur on the gene expression and transcription,and with complicated regulative factors.Indepth study of the relations between cancer multidrug resistance and metastasis will help to guide the clinical treatment of tumor.

Objective:To investigate the changes of plasma high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and metabolic indicators in obese patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).Methods:The retrospective cohort study was conducted. The clinical data of 69 obese patients who were admitted to the Tenth People′s Hospital of Tongji University from August 2013 to March 2017 were collected. There were 32 males and 37 females, aged (33±12)years, with a range from 18 to 65 years. Of 69 patients, 44 patients with preoperative HDL-C concentration <1.04 mmoL/L were allocated as low HDL-C group, and 25 patients with preoperative HDL-C concentration ≥1.04 mmoL/L were allocated as normal HDL-C group. Sixty-nine patients underwent LSG. Observation indicators: (1) analysis between preoperative HDL-C and clinical indicators; (2) follow-up; (3) stratified analysis of plasma HDL-C. Follow-up was conducted using outpatient examination and hospitalization review to detect changes of plasma HDL-C, insulin resistance index, uric acid, free fatty acids and body mass every 3 months after operation up to September 2017. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the t test. Measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M ( P25, P75), and comparison between groups was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Count data were expressed as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was analyzed using the chi-square test. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze measurement data with normal distribution, and Spearman correlation was used to analyze measurement data with skewed distribution. Repeated measurement data were analyzed by ANOVA. Results:(1) Analysis between preoperative HDL-C and clinical indicators: results of correlation analysis showed that the preoperative plasma HDL-C concentration was negative correlated with the body mass, height, abdominal circumference, insulin resistance index and triglyceride in 69 patients ( r=-0.246, -0.307, -0.262, -0.253, -0.301, P<0.05), and the preoperative plasma HDL-C concentration was not correlated with the age, body mass index (BMI), fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma glutamyltransferase, uric acid, creatinine, free fatty acid, fasting serum insulin, total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol ( P>0.05). The preoperative plasma HDL-C concentration was still negative correlated with the body mass in 69 patients after adjusting for age, BMI, fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting serum insulin and insulin resistance index ( r=-0.277, P<0.05). (2) Follow-up: 69 patients were followed up postoperatively for 6 months (6 months, 12 months). The plasma HDL-C concentration, insulin resistance index, uric acid, free fatty acids, body mass of low HDL-C group at postoperative 3 and 6 months were (0.96±0.18)mmol/L, 2.20(0.51, 11.66), (411±93)μmol/L, 0.57 mmol/L (0.20 mmol/L, 1.00 mmol/L), (92±18)kg and (1.11±0.18)mmol/L, 2.19(0.71, 8.75), (389±100)μmol/L, 0.40 mmol/L(0.13 mmol/L, 1.10 mmol/L), (86±17)kg, respectively. The above indicators of normal HDL-C group at postoperative 3 and 6 months were (1.17±0.24)mmol/L, 2.22(0.24, 7.04), (379±105)μmol/L, 0.60 mmol/L(0.27 mmol/L, 1.10 mmol/L), (84±16)kg and (1.34±0.20)mmol/L, 1.60(0.36, 5.56), (359±92)μmol/L, 0.42 mmol/L (0.16 mmol/L, 2.90 mmol/L), (80±18)kg, respectively. There was significant difference in the changes of postoperative plasma HDL-C concentration between the two groups ( F=41.443, P<0.05), and there was interaction between groups and time points ( F=6.252, P<0.05). There was significant difference between different time points ( F=29.900, P<0.05). There was significant difference in the changes of postoperative insulin resistance index between the two groups ( F=4.313, P<0.05), and there was no interaction between groups and time points ( F=2.298, P>0.05). There was significant difference between different time points ( F=29.800, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the changes of postoperative uric acid between the two groups ( F=1.669, P>0.05), and there was no interaction between groups and time points ( F=0.111, P>0.05). There was significant difference between different time points ( F=12.796, P<0.05). There was significant difference in the changes of postoperative free fatty acids between the two groups ( F=5.465, P<0.05), and there was no interaction between groups and time points ( F=0.504, P>0.05). There was no significant difference between different time points ( F=1.405, P>0.05). There was significant difference in the changes of postoperative body mass between the two groups ( F=5.614, P<0.05), and there was no interaction between groupsand time points ( F=2.174, P>0.05). There was significant difference between different time points ( F=497.496, P<0.05). (3) Stratified analysis of plasma HDL-C. ① Changes of postoperative plasma HDL-C in obese patients of different genders: of 69 patients, the plasma HDL-C concentration of the 32 male patients before operation and at postoperative 3 and 6 months were (0.91±0.19)mmol/L, (1.02±0.24)mmol/L, (1.18±0.23)mmol/L, respectively, and the percentage increase of plasma HDL-C concentration at postoperative 3 and 6 months were 12.00%(4.00%, 12.00%)and 20.00%(12.00%, 39.25%), respectively. The above indicators of the 37 female patients were (1.05±0.21)mmol/L, (1.06±0.22)mmol/L, (1.22±0.22)mmol/L and 0(-9.50%, 8.25%), 12.00%(2.00%, 23.00%), respectively. There was significant difference in the changes of percentage increase of plasma HDL-C concentration between the male and female patients ( F= 6.716, P<0.05), and there was interaction between groups and time points ( F=3.861, P<0.05). There was significant difference between different time points ( F=37.374, P<0.05). ② Changes of postoperative plasma HDL-C in obese patients of different genders in low HDL-C group and normal HDL-C group: of 44 patients in low HDL-C group, the plasma HDL-C concentration of the 24 male patients before operation and at postoperative 3 and 6 months were (0.82±0.12)mmol/L, (0.99±0.21)mmol/L, (1.12±0.22)mmol/L, respectively, and the percentage increase of plasma HDL-C concentration at postoperative 3 and 6 months were 16.00%(-1.75%, 28.75%) and 27.50%(15.75%, 43.50%), respectively. The above indicators of the 20 female patients in low HDL-C group were (0.89±0.08)mmol/L, (0.93±0.14)mmol/L, (1.10±0.14)mmol/L and 1.50%(-8.25%, 16.50%), 18.00%(9.00%, 23.00%), respectively. There was significant difference in the changes of percentage increase of plasma HDL-C concentration between the male and female patients ( F=4.503, P<0.05), and there was interaction between groups and time points ( F=3.594, P<0.05). There was significant difference between different time points ( F=37.096, P<0.05). Of 25 patients in normal HDL-C group, the plasma HDL-C concentration of the 8 male patients before operation and at postoperative 3 and 6 months were (1.15±0.12)mmol/L, (1.12±0.32)mmol/L, (1.32±0.21)mmol/L, respectively, and the percentage increase of plasma HDL-C concentration at postoperative 3 and 6 months were -1.00%(-14.00%, 12.00%), 13.50%(6.75%, 32.50%), respectively. The above indicators of the 17 female patients in normal HDL-C group were (1.23±0.16)mmol/L, (1.20±0.20)mmol/L, (1.36±0.20)mmol/L and 0(-13.75%, 4.25%), 5.50%(0, 28.50%), respectively. There was no significant difference in the changes of percentage increase of plasma HDL-C concentration between the male and female patients ( F=0.209, P>0.05), and there was no interaction between groups and time points ( F=0.176, P>0.05). There was significant difference between different time points ( F=6.481, P<0.05). Conclusions:For patients with low or normal plasma HDL-C concentration preoperative, there are significant differences in the changes of HDL-C, insulin resistance index, free fatty acids and body mass after LSG. There is significant difference in the changes of postoperative percentage increase of plasma HDL-C concentration between male and female patients who with low plasma HDL-C concentration preoperative.

OBJECTIVETo investigate the effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG) on sex hormone in male patients with severe obesity.

METHODSRetrospective analysis was performed in 31 male patient with severe obese [body mass index(BMI) ≥28 kg/m, obesity group] who underwent LSG in Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University from December 2012 to May 2016. The anthropometric parameters(weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, body fat percentage), glucose metabolic indices [fasting plasma glucose(FPG), fasting insulin (FINS), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance index(HOMA-IR)], and sex hormone parameters [estradiol(E2), total testosterone (TT), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH)] were collected preoperatively and 1, 3, 6 months postoperatively. In addition, 31 healthy male volunteers with normal BMI were consecutively recruited in this study as control group. The above-mentioned parameters were also determined in control group. Changes of these variables before and after surgery were analyzed. Pearson method was used to analyze the correlation of TT with anthropometric parameters and glucose metabolic indices before and after surgery.

RESULTSThe average age of patients in obesity and control group was (32.9±9.7) (18 to 56) years and (30.7±8.9) (18 to 49) years. Compared to the control group, obesity group had significantly higher anthropometric parameters and glucose metabolic indices before surgery (all P<0.05). In obesity group, the anthropometric and glucose metabolic indices significantly decreased at 1 to 6 months after surgery compared to those before surgery (all P<0.05). At 1 month after surgery, the anthropometric parameters and glucose metabolic indices in obesity group were significantly higher than those in control group (all P<0.05). At 3, and 6 months after surgery, there were no significant differences in glucose metabolic indices between obesity and control group (all P>0.05), while the anthropometric parameters in obesity group were still significantly higher than those in control group(all P<0.05). The sex hormone parameters in control and obesity group before surgery were as follows: E2: (100.2±23.5) pmol/L and (129.2±81.9) pmol/L; TT: (18.0±4.9) nmol/L and (8.4±4.5) nmol/L; FSH: (4.5±3.1) IU/L and (4.3±2.5) IU/L; LH: (4.4±1.7) IU/L and (5.3±2.6) IU/L. Compared to control group, the TT level of obese patients before surgery significantly decreased(P=0.000), while no significant differences were observed in the levels of E2, FSH, and LH(all P>0.05). The TT levels were significantly increased at 1, 3, 6 months after surgery[(13.1±7.0), (13.6±5.7), (21.0±19.3) nmol/L, respectively, all P<0.05] and the E2 level was significantly decreased at 6 months after surgery [(91.4±44.9) pmol/L, P<0.05], while no significant differences were observed at 1 and 3 months after surgery (all P>0.05). Furthermore, the FSH and LH levels did not exhibit significant change at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery compared to those before surgery (all P>0.05). At 1 month after surgery, no significant correlations were examined in the change value of TT levels (▹TT) with the changes of BMI(▹BMI), FPG(▹FPG), FINS(▹FINS), HOMA-IR(▹HOMA-IR), and E2(▹E2) (all P>0.05). At 3 months after surgery, ▹TT was negatively correlated with ▹BMI (r=-0.441, P=0.015), ▹FINS (r=-0.375, P=0.041), and ▹HOMA-IR(r=-0.397, P=0.030), but not correlated with ▹FPG and ▹E2 (all P>0.05). At 6 months after surgery, ▹TT was negatively correlated with ▹BMI(r=-0.510, P=0.018) and ▹HOMA-IR (r=-0.435, P=0.049), but not correlated with ▹FPG, ▹FINS and ▹E2 (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONSMale severe obese patients are accompanied with abnormal sex hormone levels. LSG has a significant effect on weight loss and blood glucose improvement, and may ameliorate the sex hormone unbalance by improving the insulin resistance in men with severe obesity.

Adult ; Bariatric Surgery ; Blood Glucose ; physiology ; Body Mass Index ; Body Weights and Measures ; China ; Estradiol ; blood ; physiology ; Fasting ; blood ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone ; blood ; physiology ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastrectomy ; Glycated Hemoglobin A ; physiology ; Humans ; Insulin ; blood ; physiology ; Insulin Resistance ; physiology ; Luteinizing Hormone ; blood ; physiology ; Male ; Obesity, Morbid ; surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Testosterone ; blood ; physiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Weight Loss ; physiology