Objective To analyze the efficacy of rosuvastatin on the patients with hyperlipidemia and hypertension.Methods From March 2011 to June 2012,112 cases with hyperlipidemia and hypertension in our hospital were enrolled in this study.Patients were randomly divided into treatment group and control group (56 patients,each).Patients in control group were treated with oral amlodipine 5 mg/d.Patients in treatment group were treated with oral rosuvastain 10 mg/d and oral amlodipine 5 mg/d.One month after the treatment,the levels of blood pressure,total cholesterol (TC),tryglyceride (TG),low density liporotein (LDL-C),high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C),high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were determined.The occurrence of adverse effects were observed.Results One month after treatment,systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were significantly decreased in both two groups compared with pre-treatment [Control group:(135.2±9.51)mm Hgvs.(59.2±7.3)mm Hg,(88.8±5.2)mm Hg vs.(99.5±8.3)mm Hg,t=4.95,2.87; Treatment group:(130.2±5.5)mm Hg vs.(160.3±9.3)mm Hg,(86.7± 10.2)mm Hg vs.(99.7±8.3)mm Hg,t=5.03,2.94,all P＜0.01],but more declines were found in treatment group than in control group(t=3.96,3.42,both P＜0.001).The levels of LDL-C,TG and TC were significantly decreased in both two groups compared with pre-treatment [Control group:(2.64±0.72)mmol/L vs.(3.97±0.84)mmol/L,(1.89±0.25)mmol/L vs.(2.56±0.45)mmol/L,(4.23±0.56)mmol/L vs.(7.36±0.48)mmol/L,t=2.58,3.03,2.36,P=0.013,0.004,0.022;Treatment group:(1.75 ± 0.68) mmol/L vs.(3.85 ± 0.79) mmol/L,(1.71 ± 0.18) mmol/L vs.(2.63±0.42)mmol/L,(3.18±0.47)mmol/L vs.(7.20±0.56)mmol/L,t=2.77,3.16,2.59,P=0.008,0.003,0.012,respectively],but more declines were observed in treatment group than in control group(t=6.73,4.37,10.70 respectively,all P＜0.05).The HDL-C concentrations were increased in both two groups compared with pre-treatment [Control group:(0.97±0.26)mmol/L vs.(0.75±0.31)mmol/L,t=2.89,P=0.006; Treatment group:(1.09±0.23)mmol/L vs.(0.72±0.24)mmol/L,t=3.01,P=0.004],but more increment were observed in treatment group than in control group(t=2.59,P＜0.05).The hsCRP concentration was significantly reduced in treatment group compared with pre-treatment [(1.32±0.17) mg/L vs.(4.97±0.13) mg/L,t=4.40,P＜0.001].There were no significant differences in liver and kidney function between the two groups.Serious adverse effects were not found.Conclusions Rosuvastatin combined with routine antihypertensive therapy can effectively decrease the levels of serum LDL-C,TG,hsCRP; increase serum HDL-C concentration and blood pressure can be effectively controlled.

Objective To investigate in knowledge rate of 120 first aid and satisfaction rate with emergency services among Nanchong citizens. Methods 360 patients who received prehospital first aid from three hospitals and their accompanies were selected from January to June 2010. The investigation content included knowledge rate of 120 first aid and satisfaction rate with emergency services. Results Results showed that about half of those surveyed still did not know the emergency phone"120" and its function, lacked self-help and self-protection knowledge, some respondents felt quite helpless upon daily life of electric shock, gas poisoning, coma and traumatic accidents. The attitude of the majority of emergency personnel was good or better, but still very stiff or irresponsible attitude existed in those few. This undermined the "120" and the image of credibility and emergency personnel. Conclusions There is an urgent need for universal coverage of on-site first aid knowledge and enhance awareness of first aid. Full-time staff in emergency department must pay close attention to the knowledge of first aid training, mastering the technique of bleeding control and bandaging, fixing, handling and CPR, as well as the use of instruments and equipment equipped in vehicles. Only in this way can we continuously improve the treatment of critically ill patients and increase survival rate.

Objective To explore the effect of head nurses′tutoring and commenting on nursing ward round. Methods The nursing ward rounds performed during August 2013 to July 2014 were assigned as the control group and those nursing ward rounds during August 2014 to August 2015 as observation group: in the former group routine nursing ward rounds were done once a week and in the latter the rounds were performed by head nurses′tutoring and commenting once every week. The two groups were compared in terms of examination performances of nursing ward rounds, doctors′ and nurses′ satisfaction degree, nurses′ and student nurses′evaluation on the ward rounds and their critical thinking ability. Results The examination performances and the satisfaction degree in the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The nurses in the observation group thought the head nurse′s commenting at ward rounds could be more effective than those from the control group in their improvement of theoretical knowledge and clinical ability (P<0.05). In terms of critical thinking by California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version), the total score and the scores on its dimensions in the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group. Conclusion The nursing ward rounds by head nurses′tutoring and commenting can help the nurses to strengthen their ability in nursing ward rounds and improve their theory and clinical practice so that the nursing quality is improved.

OBJECTIVETo evaluate and compare the value of Modified NIH criteria and AFIP criteria for the risk classification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

METHODSClinicopathological and follow-up data of 539 patients diagnosed as primary GIST with or without irregular tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the Nanfang Hospital(n=143), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (n=138), Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (n=102) and Wuhan Union Hospital (n=156) from January 2012 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Recurrence risks of these 539 patients were classified by the modified NIH criteria and AFIP criteria. Overall survival and tumor-free survival of patients with different risks were compared by Log-rank test and the accuracy of the two criteria in predicting postoperative recurrence was compared by receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves.

RESULTSOf 539 GIST patients, 283 were male and 256 were female; the age was (56.5±12.5) years old; tumors of 390 cases (72.4%) located in the stomach; tumor diameter of 178 cases (33.0%) was more than 5 cm; nuclear division number of 164 cases(30.4%) was more than 5/50 high magnification. The mean follow-up time was (37.5±13.6) months. According to the modified NIH criteria, the mean overall survival time of patients with very low, low, intermediate, and high risk was 52.0, 57.0, 56.9 and 53.6 months respectively (P=0.002), and the mean tumor-free survival time was 56.0, 58.1, 58.2 and 51.2 months respectively (P=0.000). According to the AFIP criteria, the mean overall survival time of patients with very low, low, intermediate, and high risk was 54.1, 57.8, 55.5 and 52.0 months respectively(P=0.015), and the mean tumor-free survival time was 57.3, 56.6, 54.9 and 50.4 months respectively(P=0.000). While predicting the risk of postoperative recurrence, the ROC curve of AFIP criteria has a larger area under the curve compared to the curve of the modified NIH criteria(0.689 vs 0.641, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONCompared with the modified NIH criteria, AFIP criteria predicts the risk postoperative recurrence more accurately in GIST patients.