1.Predictive factors for seizures and efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Ronnie E. Baticulon ; Kevin Ivan P. Chan ; Peter Paul P. Rivera ; Gerardo D. Legaspi ; Willy G. Lopez
Acta Medica Philippina 2020;54(2):101-108
Objectives:
To identify factors that predict the occurrence of seizures in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and to evaluate the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in preventing in-hospital seizures among patients who undergo clip occlusion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, the medical charts of 205 patients admitted for aneurysmal SAH in Philippine General Hospital (PGH) and who underwent craniotomy and clipping of aneurysm from January 2011 to June 2014 were reviewed. Demographic, radiologic, and clinical factors were converted into categorical variables and their association with the occurrence of seizures analyzed. The incidence of seizures among patients who received an AED (AED cohort) and those who did not receive an AED (No AED cohort) were compared. Secondarily, the effects of seizures and AED use on early postoperative outcomes were determined using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) on the day of discharge.
Results:
Among 205 patients with aneurysmal SAH, 31 (15.1%) developed seizures. 21 (10.2%) had seizures at onset of SAH and only seven (3.4%) had in-hospital seizures. Aneurysm re-rupture (OR 5.26, p-value 0.045) and the presence of a parenchymal clot (OR 2.90, p-value 0.043) were independent predictors for seizure occurrence. There was no significant difference in the incidence of seizures in the AED cohort and in the No AED cohort (4/100, 4% vs. 3/99, 3%, p-value 0.714). AED use was associated with a higher proportion of patients with a discharge GOS score of 3 or less (28.0% vs 12.1%, p-value 0.005).
Conclusion
The results of the study do not support the routine use of AEDs in patients with aneurysmal SAH.
Seizures
;
Aneurysm
;
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
;
Craniotomy
;
Phenytoin
;
Levetiracetam
;
Anticonvulsants
2.Efficacy and safety of switching from brand-name to domestic generic levetiracetam in children with epilepsy.
Ming-Juan LIANG ; Wei-Feng QIU ; Jing-Wen ZHANG ; Xue-Ping LI ; Gang-An SHI ; Qiong-Xiang ZHAI ; Yu-Xin ZHANG ; Zhi-Hong CHEN
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2022;24(3):285-289
OBJECTIVES:
To study the efficacy and safety of domestic generic levetiracetam in replacement of brand-name levetiracetam in the treatment of children with epilepsy.
METHODS:
A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical data of 154 children with epilepsy who received domestic generic levetiracetam in the inpatient or outpatient service of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital from May 2019 to December 2020. Domestic generic levetiracetam and brand-name levetiracetam were compared in terms of efficacy and safety.
RESULTS:
For these 154 children, the epilepsy control rate was 77.3% (119/154) at baseline. At 6 months after switching to domestic generic levetiracetam, the epilepsy control rate reached 83.8% (129/154), which showed a significant increase (P<0.05). There was no significant change in the frequency of seizures from baseline to 6 months after switching (P>0.05). The incidence of refractory epilepsy in children with no response after switching treatment was significantly higher than that in children with response (P<0.05). Before switching, only 1 child (0.6%) experienced somnolence, while after switching, 3 children (1.9%) experienced mild adverse drug reactions, including dizziness, somnolence, irritability, and bad temper.
CONCLUSIONS
Switching from brand-name to generic levetiracetam is safe and effective and holds promise for clinical application, but more prospective randomized controlled trials are required in future.
Child
;
Epilepsy/drug therapy*
;
Humans
;
Levetiracetam
;
Prospective Studies
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Seizures
3.Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam versus phenytoin as second-line drugs for the treatment of children with convulsive status epilepticus: a Meta analysis.
Rui SHI ; Huai-Qing YIN ; Zhuan-Zhuan WANG
Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics 2021;23(4):356-362
OBJECTIVE:
To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) versus phenytoin (PHT) as second-line drugs for the treatment of convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) in children.
METHODS:
English and Chinese electronic databases were searched for the randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of LEV and PHT as second-line drugs for the treatment of childhood CSE. RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis.
RESULTS:
Seven studies with 1 434 children were included. The Meta analysis showed that compared with the PHT group, the LEV group achieved a significantly higher control rate of CSE (
CONCLUSIONS
LEV has a better clinical effect than PHT in the treatment of children with CSE and does not increase the incidence rate of adverse events.
Anticonvulsants/adverse effects*
;
Child
;
Humans
;
Levetiracetam/therapeutic use*
;
Pharmaceutical Preparations
;
Phenytoin/adverse effects*
;
Status Epilepticus/drug therapy*
5.New-Onset Geriatric Epilepsy in China: A Single-Center Study.
Jian-Hua CHEN ; Xiang-Qin ZHOU ; Qiang LU ; Li-Ri JIN ; Yan HUANG
Chinese Medical Journal 2018;131(24):2915-2920
Background:
Few studies have been published on new-onset geriatric epilepsy especially in older Chinese people. This study was to have a comprehensive understanding of new-onset geriatric epilepsy and find a more reasonable diagnosis and management of epilepsy in older people.
Methods:
One hundred and three patients with onset age 60 years and older were admitted between January 2008 and December 2016. Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect information.
Results:
There were 103 older patients with new-onset epilepsy. The mean age of the patients was 68.5 ± 6.4 years (range: 60-89 years), and there were 67 (65%) men and 36 (35%) women. The mean onset age was 67.9 ± 6.2 years (range: 60-89 years). The most common identifiable etiology of symptomatic seizures was autoimmune epilepsy in 43 (41.7%) patients. The second most common etiology was stroke in 15 (14.6%) patients. Seven (6.8%) older patients with acute seizures present with status epilepticus and 26 (25.2%) patients experienced clustered seizures (more than three events in 24 h) at seizure onset. Focal seizures (96.1%) were more common than generalized seizures (3.9%). Fifty-three (51.5%) patients had an abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Among them, video-electroencephalogram findings in 31 (30.1%) patients correlated with MRI abnormalities. Levetiracetam was the most used drugs before admission, in hospital, and during follow-up.
Conclusions
Autoimmune encephalitis is becoming an increasing risk factor of subsequent epilepsy in older people. Older patients with new epilepsy are more likely to respond to antiepileptic drugs, and drug-resistant epilepsy is uncommon.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Electroencephalography
;
Epilepsy
;
diagnostic imaging
;
drug therapy
;
etiology
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Levetiracetam
;
therapeutic use
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Prognosis
6.Levetiracetam administration is correlated with lower mortality in patients with mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes: a retrospective study.
Zhe ZHANG ; Dan-Hua ZHAO ; Xu-Tong ZHAO ; Xiao ZHANG ; Hui XIONG ; Xin-Hua BAO ; Yun YUAN ; Zhao-Xia WANG
Chinese Medical Journal 2019;132(3):269-274
BACKGROUND:
Studies on the relationship between antiepileptic drug (AED) administration and clinical outcomes in patients with mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) remain scarce. Levetiracetam (LEV) is an AED that is neuroprotective in various neurologic disorders. This study aimed to determine the impact of LEV on the outcome of MELAS.
METHODS:
A retrospective, single-center study was performed based on a large cohort of patients with MELAS with a history of seizures (n = 102). Decisions on antiepileptic therapies were made empirically. Patients were followed up for 1 to 8 years (median, 4 years) and divided into 2 groups based on whether LEV was administered (LEV or non-LEV). The modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores and mortality risks were analyzed in all patients.
RESULTS:
LEV, carbamazepine, benzodiazepines, topiramate, oxcarbazepine, valproate, and lamotrigine were administered in 48, 37, 18, 13, 11, 9, and 9 patients, singly or in combination, respectively. The mean mRS score of the LEV group (n = 48) was lower than that of the non-LEV group (n = 54; mean ± standard deviation, 2.79 ± 1.47 vs. 3.83 ± 1.93, P = 0.006) up to the end of the study. Nevertheless, there was no difference in the proportion of subjects without disability (mRS ranging 0-1) between the groups (P = 0.37). The multivariate regressions revealed that LEV treatment was associated with lower mRS scores (odds ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.68, P = 0.003) and mortality rates (hazard ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.74, P = 0.013). There was a significant difference in the Kaplan-Meier survival curves between the groups (χ = 4.29, P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS
The LEV administration is associated with lower mortality in patients with MELAS in this retrospective study. Further laboratory research and prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm whether LEV has neuroprotective effects on patients with mitochondrial diseases.
Acidosis, Lactic
;
drug therapy
;
mortality
;
Adolescent
;
Anticonvulsants
;
therapeutic use
;
Carbamazepine
;
therapeutic use
;
Child
;
Child, Preschool
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Lamotrigine
;
therapeutic use
;
Levetiracetam
;
administration & dosage
;
therapeutic use
;
Male
;
Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathies
;
drug therapy
;
mortality
;
Oxcarbazepine
;
therapeutic use
;
Prospective Studies
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Stroke
;
drug therapy
;
mortality
;
Topiramate
;
therapeutic use
;
Valproic Acid
;
therapeutic use