Objective To observe the effect of low frequency electrical stimulation on dysphagia after stroke. Methods 60 patients with dysphagia after stroke were divided into treatment group and control group with 30 cases in each group. The control group was treated with swallowing exercise, while the treatment group was treated with low frequency electrical stimulation in addition. They were assessed with Fujishima's swallowing evaluation before and after treatment. Results The score increased after treatment in both groups (P<0.05), and increased more in the treatment group than in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Low frequency electrical stimulation can improve the effects of swallowing exercise on dysphagia after stroke.

Objective:To investigate the value of BRAF V600E mutation combined with 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines ultrasound (US) pattern in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology of thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS).Methods:This study retrospectively enrolled 96 consecutive patients with 101 AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules who underwent preoperative US, FNA, and BRAF V600E mutation analysis. All AUS/FLUS nodules were classified based on US pattern-based risk stratification of 2015 ATA Guidelines. With postoperative pathology as the gold standard, the diagnostic value of BRAF V600E mutation, US pattern and the combination of two methods were compared.Results:Postoperative pathology confirmed 33 benign nodules and 68 malignant nodules. The mutation rates of BRAF V600E in AUS/FLUS nodules was 51.5%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of BRAF V600E in the diagnosis AUS/FLUS nodules were 72.1%, 90.9% and 78.2%, respectively. The ROC curve demonstrated that the best cut-off of US pattern was high suspicion. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of US pattern in the diagnosis of AUS/FLUS nodules were 63.2%, 81.8% and 69.3%, respectively. The accuracy of US pattern in determining AUS/FLUS nodules without BRAF V600E mutation was 70.6%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the combination of two methods in the differential diagnosis of AUS/FLUS nodules were 89.7%, 75.8%, and 85.1%, respectively. The combination had the highest sensitivity ( P<0.05). Conclusions:BRAF V600E mutation has a good diagnostic value for differentiating benign and malignant AUS/FLUS nodules. Combined with US pattern, the differential diagnostic value for AUS/FLUS nodules without BRAF V600E mutation can be improved, and the sensitivity can be raised.