1.Is there a Significant Difference in Surgery and Outcomes between Unipolar and Bipolar Hip Hemiarthroplasty? A Retrospective Study of a Single Institution in Singapore
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2011;5(1):3-7
Objective: The aim was to compare outcomes differences between unipolar and bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty in one institution for the local geriatric population. Methodology: A retrospective review of 291 patients aged 70 and above who underwent hip hemiarthroplasty for neck of femur fracture from February 2004 to November 2006 was performed. Results: Operative time was lower in the unipolar group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of superficial wound infection, d
2.Review of Proximal Nail Antirotation (PFNA) and PFNA-2 – Our Local Experience
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal 2011;5(2):1-5
The proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) device was
recently introduced as an option for intramedullary
management of pertrochanteric hip fractures. We report here
local results with this relatively new implant. Sixty-two
patients with pertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fractures
underwent intramedullary fixation with PFNA devices in our
centre during the 14 month period from September 2008 to
October 2009. Data for this report were retrieved from
clinical case records and operative notes. We recorded the
age, gender, length of stay and operative time, preoperative ambulatory status and days required to regain mobility. Fractures were classified using the AO classification (A1, A2 and A3). Complications were also identified.There were 15 male and 47 female patients and the mean age was 74.3years. The mean surgical duration was 76.1min and the average length of hospitalisation was 14.5 days. Five cases were noted to have femoral shaft fracture and no occurrences of screw cutout. We found that 83.9% of the patients were able to regain preoperative mobility status by 6 months following surgery. We conclude that the PFNA is an effective implant for stabilisation of proximal hip fractures and that the local complication rate is similar to reports from other centres.
3.Thirty Years of Bone Marrow Transplantation in the Singapore General Hospital.
Colin PHIPPS ; Aloysius Yl HO ; Yeh Ching LINN ; Sathish GOPALAKRISHNAN ; Ai Leen ANG ; Jing Jing LEE ; Hong Yen NG ; Francesca Wi LIM ; Priscilla Sm GOH ; Yvonne Sm LOH ; Patrick Hc TAN ; Liang Piu KOH ; Mickey Bc KOH ; Lai Heng LEE ; Yeow Tee GOH ; Yong Wan ONG ; William Yk HWANG
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2016;45(7):315-317
Bone Marrow Transplantation
;
history
;
methods
;
HLA Antigens
;
immunology
;
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
;
history
;
methods
;
History, 20th Century
;
History, 21st Century
;
Hospitals, General
;
Humans
;
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
;
history
;
methods
;
Singapore
;
Transplantation Conditioning
;
history
;
methods