BACKGROUND: XDP is an X-linked recessive disorder characterized by parkinsonism and dystonia described among Filipinos. Oral medications are frequently ineffective. Lately, DBS have been promising. However these are not generally available or affordable for the vast majority of patients. We then decided to evaluate the effectiveness of levodopa-carbidopa for XDP.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of levodopa-carbidopa vs. placebo in XDP patients.
METHODS: After informed consent and randomization, the BFM and the UPDRS parts III and IV were performed at baseline and monthly up to 6 months. Patients were randomized to receive either levodopa-carbidopa at a starting dose of 125 mg levodopa/ day in 2 divided doses or corresponding placebo. Gradual uptitration was done to a maximum of 1000 mg levodopa/ day or until side effects appeared.
Homogeneity of the characteristics of patients in the 2 groups was determined using Independent t-test and Chi-square test. To determine the significance of changes in the efficacy parameters within each group, Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Signed Ranks Test was used. To compare the scores of the different efficacy parameters of the 2 groups, Mann Whitney U Test was applied to the data. A p?0.050 was considered significant.
RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were recruited. There were 13 screen failures, and 94 were subsequently enrolled. The baseline characteristics (age, duration of illness, baseline BFM and UPDRS (motor) scores were not significant between levodopa and placebo (age in years: 47 + 9.35 vs. 50 + 9.51; duration of illness in years 6.3 + 7 vs. 6.2 + 5.2; BFM score: 32.8 + 24.5 vs. 28.4 + 26.5; UPDRS score 29.9 + 20.7 vs. 34.8 + 26.8).
There was a decrease in BFM scores from baseline to all follow-up periods in patients given levodopa but were statistically significant only on visit 2 and visit 9. In the placebo group, decrease in scores was also observed in some observation periods but no statistical significance was shown. A comparison of the 2 groups showed that the magnitude of decrease in the levodopa group was statistically greater than the placebo group on the second visit. There were no significant differences observed in all other follow-up periods. Both groups showed a decrease in UPDRS scores but significant decrease was observed in visits 2, 5, 6, 7, 9 of the levodopa group. While in the placebo group, a significant decrease was observed only on visit 2. Comparison of the 2 groups did not show any significant differences.
There were 17 patients from the levodopa group who reported adverse events (most common: increased involuntary movements, nausea/ vomiting/ dizziness, headache, and generalized weakness. In the placebo group, there were 11 patients (most common: increased involuntary movements, abdominal pain). There were 9 patients who dropped out (levodopa: 4, placebo: 5).
CONCLUSION: There was a significant decrease in the BFM and UPDRS scores in XDP patients given levodopa compared to placebo. Levodopa is a safe and effective drug that may be considered in patients with XDP.
NOTE: This study was supported by an unrestricted grant by Torrent Pharma Philippines, Inc.

X-linked dystonia parkinsonism (XDP) is a rapidly progressive and disabling neurodegenerative disease affecting mainly male Filiponos with origins from Panay Island. We reviewed all the past neurosurgical ablative procedures done for XDP patients listed in the Philippine XDP registry. From 1960 to 1982, six patients had undergone bilateral chemopallidotomies or bilateral thalomotomies stage over time. Half of these patients had significant improvement in their symptoms but five of the six patients (83%) developed postoperative morbidities, mainly speech impairment or hemiparesis, All the five reported GPi deep brain stimulation (DBS) cases for XDP were also reviewed, showing consistently immediate improvement of symptoms (61.5%-88.3% decrease in the Burke-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale) lasting up to a year with effects noted. We also present the first Philippine case of GPi DBS done in the youngest XDP patients to date. This present case showed dramatic improvement(83.3% desrease of the Burke-Marsden_Fahn Dystonia Rating Scale) of his dystonic symptoms, without incurring any persistent adverse effects. The results of these early cases of pallidal DBS for XDP show that DBS is generally a safe and effective procedure for alleviating the disabling symptoms of XDP in contrast to previous ablative surgeries on these patient

Ambulatory Care ; COVID-19 ; Health Facility Planning ; Hospital Bed Capacity ; Hospitals, Rehabilitation ; Humans ; Infection Control ; Rehabilitation ; Remote Consultation ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Singapore ; Telerehabilitation ; Triage

Objective: Comprehensive understanding of polyenvironmental risk factors for the development of psychosis is important. Based on a review of related evidence, we developed the Korea Polyenvironmental Risk Score (K-PERS) for psychosis. We investigated whether the K-PERS can differentiate patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) from healthy controls (HCs). Methods: We reviewed existing tools for measuring polyenvironmental risk factors for psychosis, including the Maudsley Environmental Risk Score (ERS), polyenviromic risk score (PERS), and Psychosis Polyrisk Score (PPS). Using odds ratios and relative risks for Western studies and the “population proportion” (PP) of risk factors for Korean data, we developed the K-PERS, and compared the scores thereon between patients with SSDs and HCs. In addition, correlation was performed between the K-PERS and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Results: We first constructed the “K-PERS-I,” comprising five factors based on the PPS, and then the “K-PERS-II” comprising six factors based on the ERS. The instruments accurately predicted participants’ status (case vs. control). In addition, the K-PERS-I and -II scores exhibited significant negative correlations with the negative symptom factor score of the PANSS. Conclusion The K-PERS is the first comprehensive tool developed based on PP data obtained from Korean studies that measures polyenvironmental risk factors for psychosis. Using pilot data, the K-PERS predicted patient status (SSD vs. HC). Further research is warranted to examine the relationship of K-PERS scores with clinical outcomes of psychosis and schizophrenia.

Sex-linked dystonia parkinsonism (XDP, DYT3, "Lubag") is an adult-onset, progressive, debilitating movement disorder first described in Filipino males from Panay Island in 1975. XDP manifests predominantly as torsion dystonia, later combined with or sometimes replaced with parkinsonism. Within the Island of Panay, the preva-lence rate is highest in the province of Capiz, where 1:4000 men suffer from the disorder. There is a high degree of penetrance and generalization. While women often serve as carriers, XDP is not limited to men. An updated XDP Philippine registry (as of January 2010) has identified 505 cases, with 500 males and 5 females. While some report that females may carry a milder form of the disorder, in our experience, both sexes generally follow a similar progressive clinical course.

Methods: Patients with 1-year postoperative dynamic cervical spine radiographs following ACDF were grouped into serotonin reuptake inhibitor prescriptions (SSRI, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor [SNRI], or tricyclic antidepressant [TCA]) and no prescription (atypical antidepressant or no antidepressant). Pseudarthrosis was defined as ≥1 mm interspinous process motion on dynamic radiographs. Logistic regression models were controlled for confounding to analyze pseudarthrosis rates. Alpha was set at p - values of <0.05. Results: Of the 523 patients who meet the inclusion criteria, 137 (26.2%) were prescribed an SSRI, SNRI, or TCA. Patients with these prescriptions were more likely to have pseudarthrosis (p =0.008) but not a revision surgery due to pseudarthrosis (p =0.219). Additionally, these patients had worse 1-year postoperative mental component summary (MCS)-12 (p =0.015) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) (p =0.006). The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified SSRI/SNRI/TCA use (odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11–2.99; p =0.018) and construct length (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.50–2.44; p <0.001) as pseudarthrosis predictors. A SSRI/SNRI/TCA prescription was a revision surgery predictor due to adjacent segment disease on univariate analysis (OR, 2.51; p =0.035) but not on multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR, 2.24; p =0.10). Conclusions Patients taking serotonin reuptake-inhibiting antidepressants are at increased risk of worse postoperative outcome scores, including NDI and MCS-12, likely due to their underlying depression. This may contribute to their greater likelihood of having adjacent segment surgery. Additionally, preoperative use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients undergoing an ACDF is a predictor of radiographic pseudarthrosis but not pseudarthrosis revision.