1.Clinical Analysis of 253 Cases of laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Nam Hyun YOON ; Jong Gill JEONG ; Ung Gill JEONG
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1997;52(6):876-882
No abstract available.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*
2.Considerations for problems and unusual findings in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Byeong Rhong CEOL ; Shin SON ; Kyung Hwan PARK ; Moon Kyu PARK
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1993;44(4):558-565
No abstract available.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*
3.A Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Un Yong LEE ; Won Jong LEE ; Dae Hwa CHOI
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1997;53(4):571-578
No abstract available.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*
4.A clinical analysis of laser laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Kyung Soo YU ; Kyung Chun CHI ; Jung Hyo LEE ; In Taik CHANG ; Sang Jhoon KIM
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1992;42(3):313-319
No abstract available.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*
5.Clinical analysis of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Sung Pil AHN ; Jong Won YOO ; Jung Hyo LEE ; Yong Keum PARK ; Kyung Chun CHI ; In Taik CHANG ; Sang Jhoon KIM
Korean Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2000;4(1):93-99
No abstract available.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*
6.Superior somatic pain relief and improved visceral pain control is achieved using pre-emptive analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial
Koh PS ; Cha KH ; Lucy C ; Rampal S ; Yoong BK
Journal of University of Malaya Medical Centre 2012;15(2):1-7
BACKGROUND:
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although is less invasive than open surgery, is not completely pain free. The
use of local anaesthesia to relieve pain following this procedure is a common practice. However, it remains
debatable whether a pre- or post-operative drug administration is more effective. Here, we investigated
the role of preemptive local anaesthetic infiltration given pre- or post-incisional, in relieving the pain during
laparoscopic surgery.
METHODOLOGY:
A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 96 patients receiving 0.5% Bupivacaine 100mg. Group
A (n=48) received post-incisional skin infiltration whilst Group B (n=48) received pre-incisional infiltration.
Incisional (somatic) and intra-abdominal (visceral) pain was assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at day
0, day 1 and day 7 post-operative days.
RESULT:
Baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar. Incisional pain was lower in Group B as compared
to Group A at day 0 (P=0.03) and day 1 (P<0.01). Intra-abdominal pain was also lower in Group B at day 0 and
day 1 (P= 0.04). VAS score was similar at day 7 although analgesia requirement is higher in Group A (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION:
Administration of pre-incisional local anaesthesia offers better pre-emptive pain relief measure than postincisional
administration by reducing somatic and visceral pain in laparoscopic gall bladder surgery.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
7.A prelimonary report of 111 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Sung Hwan HWANG ; Young Kil CHOI ; Sang Hyo KIM
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1993;45(5):672-678
No abstract available.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*
8.A case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in child.
Yong Hyun PARK ; Young Min WOO ; Young Woo KIM ; Sun Whe KIM ; Kwi Won PARK
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 1993;45(6):1042-1046
No abstract available.
Child*
;
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic*
;
Humans
9.Iatrogenic Gallbladder Perforation during Gastric Endoscopic Mucosal Resection.
Se Kook KEE ; Jae Oh KIM ; Oh Kyoung KWON ; Soon Young NAM
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 2010;79(3):228-233
With the exception of accidental perforation during a laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, An Iatrogenic Gallbladder Perforation Is Quite Rare. Several Cases Have Been Reported As A Complication Of Interventional Or Endoscopic Procedures. Although A Case Of Gallbladder And Stomach Perforation During Gastric Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (Emr) Has Been Reported, We Encountered A Case Of Gallbladder Perforation During Gastric Emr Without Evidence Of A Perforation Of The Stomach, Which Has Not Been Reported In The Literature.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
;
Gallbladder
;
Stomach
10.Some remarks from 118 cases of patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Viet Tiep Hospital
Journal of Practical Medicine 2005;519(9):33-36
A retrospective study was conducted on 118 patients (45 males and 73 females, mean age of 56.6) had their laparoscopic holecystectomy removed at the General Viet Tiep Hospital from Jan 2002-Dec 2004. The results as followed: cholelithiasis accounted for 96.6%, in which 76.3% were single cholelithiasis with symptoms; acute stone cholecystitis 17.8% and atrophic cholecystitis 2.5%. The rate of general complication in surgery was 20.3%, except for three open surgery cases; most of cases with complications was treated during surgery. The average time of surgery was 46.8 minutes, the average hospitalization time after surgery was 4.8 days. The rate of complication was 5.2% and there is no deaths. The laparoscopic cholecystectomy has more advantages than classical open cholecystectomy: safety, short of surgery time, quick recovery, less complications, and good aestheticism. Because of these advantages, the surgery can replace for the classical surgery, it is an ideal method in treating cholelithiasis, grall-bladder polyp, acute or chronic cholelithiasis.
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
;
Surgery
;
Cholelithiasis
Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail