1.Biomechanical effect of mid-upper fibular fracture on ankle joint
Xinmin XIE ; Laifeng LI ; Xuechun ZHAO
Orthopedic Journal of China 2006;0(14):-
[Objective]To investigate the biomechanical effect of mid-upper fibular fracture on ankle joint.[Method]From January 2005 to June 2006,20 cases of mid-upper fibular fracture were collected.Normal anterior film of bilateral ankle joint was photographed,ankle mortise width and distal fibula upper shift were measured to observe the effect on stability of ankle joint.Foot-scan pressure analyzer was used to detect the central track of footplate pressue,subtalar joint angle,in order to compare the difference between normal ankle and the sick.[Result]Dislocated mid-upper fibular fracture could lead to ankle mortise widening,lateral malleolus up shift ( averaged,1.260?0.339mm,1.045?0.276mm).the central track of footplate pressure offset and the fracture sides subtalar joint angle were larger than those in normal feet(P
2.Research on Hepatitis B virus Genotypes and Subgenotypes among Bai Nationality in Dali, Yunnan Province
Wei LI ; Yuanying SHEN ; Xuanrong ZHANG ; Laifeng REN ; Qiang LI ; Ru SHEN ; Haiping ZHAO
Virologica Sinica 2008;23(1):57-62
To investigate the distribution of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes and subgenotypes among the Bai nationality in Dali, a total of 100 serum samples from patients with chronic HBV-infection were collected for the detection of HBV genotypes and subgenotypes by genotype-specific primers and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RLFP), respectively. Among the 100 samples, the proportions of genotype B, C and mixed genotype (B+C) were 41%, 25% and 34%, respectively. All the genotype B strains belonged to subgenotype Ba. In genotype C, 84% were Subgenotype Cs and 12% were subgenotype Ce. The distribution of genotypes B, C and B+C showed no significant difference between male and female patients (P=0.182) and among the age groups of patients (P=0.812). The rates of HBeAg/HBeAg positivity were no significantly different among genotypes B, genotype C and mixed genotype (B+C) (P=0.077/P=0.663). In Dali, genotypes B, B+C and C existed among Bai nationality with chronic HBV-infection, and genotype B was the major genotype. Subgenotypes Ba and Cs were the predominant strains in patients with HBV genotype B/C infection. The most prominent characteristic was the higher prevalent rate of mixed genotype (B+C) in patients.
3.Role of phosphorylation of p53 at Ser392 in cancer therapy
Jingli LIU ; Xinli SHI ; Cheng CUI ; Laifeng REN ; Wenguang ZHENG ; Mingyuan LI
Acta Anatomica Sinica 2014;(3):437-440
Phosphorylation is the most common way of p 53 post-translational modifications .However , gaps still exist in our knowledge regarding the role and mechanism of phosphorylation of p 53 at Ser392 in carcinogenesis and cancer prevention.In the present study, we summarized the effect of phos-p53-Ser392 to wild-type and mutant p53, the regulation by DNA damage agents and protein kinase , and the significance of phosphorylation of p 53-Ser392 in cancer treatment .
4.Comparison of the effects of losartan, enalapril and their combination in the prevention of left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in the rat.
Yang YUEJIN ; Zhang PEI ; Ruan YINGMAO ; Song LAIFENG ; Xu XINGLIN ; Li YONGLI ; Zhou YANWEN ; Tian YI ; Xu YISHU ; Chen ZAIJIA
Chinese Medical Sciences Journal 2002;17(4):236-241
OBJECTIVESTo compare the effects of losartan, enalapril and their combination in the prevention of left ventricular remodeling (LVRM) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the rat.
METHODSAMI model was induced in female SD rats by ligating left coronary artery. Forty-eight hours after the procedure, 83 surviving rats were randomized into one of the following 4 groups : 1) AMI control group (n = 19), 2) losartan group (n = 22, 3 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)), 3) enalapril group (n = 20, 1 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1)), 4) losartan-enalapril combinative group (n = 22, 3 and 1 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1) respectively). 5) Sham-operated group (n = 10) and 6) normal rats group (n = 10) were selected randomly to serve as non-infarction controls. Losartan and enalapril were delivered by direct gastric gavage. After 4 weeks of medical therapy, hemodynamic studies were performed in each group, then the rat hearts were fixed with 10% formalin and pathologic analysis on them was performed. Complete experimental data was obtained in 56 rats, comprising 1) AMI controls (n = 11), 2) losartan group (n = 10), 3) enalapril group (n = 10), 4) the combination of losartan and enalapril group (n = 11), 5) sham-operated group (n = 6) and 6) normal controls (n = 8).
RESULTSThere were no significant differences among the 4 AMI groups in MI size (41.7% to approximately 43.4%, all P > 0.05). Compared with sham group, the left ventricular (LV) end diastolic pressure (LVEDP), volume (LVV), long and short axis length (L and D), as well as LV absolute and relative weight (LVAW and LVRW) in AMI group were all significantly increased (P < 0.05 to approximately 0.001); whereas the maximum left ventricular pressure rising and dropping rates (+/- dp/dt) and their corrected values by LV systolic pressure (+/- dp/dt/LVSP) were significantly reduced (all P < 0.001), indicating LVRM occurred and LV systolic and diastolic function impaired after AMI. Compared with AMI group, LVEDP, LVV, LVAW and LVRW were all significantly decreased (P < 0.05 to approximately 0.001); while +/- dp/dt/LVSP were significantly enhanced in all 3 treatment groups (P < 0.05 to approximately 0.001) except -dp/dt/LVSP in losartan group (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the above indices among the 3 treatment groups (all P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONBoth losartan and enalapril can prevent from LVRM after AMI in the rat and improve LV function with equivalent effects. There seems no additive effect when the 2 drugs are used in combination.
Animals ; Antihypertensive Agents ; pharmacology ; Drug Synergism ; Enalapril ; pharmacology ; Female ; Losartan ; pharmacology ; Myocardial Infarction ; physiopathology ; Random Allocation ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Ventricular Function, Left ; drug effects ; Ventricular Remodeling ; drug effects
5.Myocardial changes in heart transplantation recipients with primary restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Hong ZHAO ; Yang SUN ; Laifeng SONG ; Li LI ; Ying TANG ; Xuejing DUAN ; Hongyue WANG ; Qingzhi WANG ; Yan CHU ; Jie HUANG ; Shengshou HU
Chinese Journal of Cardiology 2014;42(10):856-859
OBJECTIVETo investigate the histopathological features of primary restrictive cardiomyopathy (PRCM).
METHODSNine extransplanted hearts from heart transplantation recipients were examined. Gross and histopathological findings were observed, photographed and final pathological diagnosis was compared to clinical diagnosis. The myocardial ultrastructure changes were determined using transmission electron microscopy.
RESULTSThe hallmark pathologic feature of PRCM was distinguished by myocardial cell degeneration and hyperplastic collagen fibrils around the myocardial cells.Fibrosis was severer in left ventricle free wall than in ventricular septum and right ventricle. The degree of myocardial cell degeneration and poloidal disorder were severer in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) than in patients with preserved EF. Transmission electron microscope evidenced severe interstitial fibrosis, myofibrillar changes of sarcomere structure, abnormalities both on intercalated disc number and distribution.
CONCLUSIONSPRCM is characterized by hyperplastic collagen fibrils around the cardiomyocytes. Fibrosis is severer in left ventricle than in right ventricle. Sarcomere dysplasia is the main cause of PRCM, and ultrastructural examination is helpful for PRCM diagnosis.
Cardiomyopathy, Restrictive ; surgery ; Fibrosis ; Heart Transplantation ; Heart Ventricles ; Humans ; Myocardium ; pathology ; Myocytes, Cardiac ; Sarcomeres
6.Comparison of three doses of enalapril in preventing left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction in the rat.
Yuejin YANG ; Pei ZHANG ; Laifeng SONG ; Yingmao RUAN ; Xinlin XU ; Yongli LI ; Yanwen ZHOU ; Yi TIAN ; Yishu XU ; Zaijia CHEN
Chinese Medical Journal 2002;115(3):347-351
OBJECTIVETo compare the effects of high, middle and low doses of enalapril in preventing left ventricular remodeling (LVRM) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in rats, especially evaluating the efficacy of low dose enalapril.
METHODSAMI was induced by ligating the left coronary artery in 149 female SD rats. 48 hours after the procedure, the 97 surviving rats were randomized to one of the following four groups: (1) AMI controls (n = 24), (2) high-dose (10 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1), n = 25), (3) middle-dose (1 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1), n = 23), and (4) low-dose (0.1 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1), n = 25) enalapril groups. In addition, sham-operated (n = 13) and normal rats (n = 10) were randomly selected to serve as non-infarction controls. Enalapril was delivered by direct gastric gavage. After 4 weeks of therapy, hemodynamic studies were performed, then the rat hearts were fixed with 10% formalin and pathology analysis was performed. Exclusive of the dead rats and those with MI size < 35% or > 55%, complete experimental data were obtained from 67 rats, which were comprised of (1) AMI controls (n = 13), (2) high-dose enalapril (n = 13), (3) middle-dose enalapril (n = 12), (4) low-dose enalapril (n = 12), (5) sham-operated (n = 8) and (6) normal (n = 9) groups.
RESULTSThere were no significant differences among the four AMI groups in infarction size (all P > 0.05). Compared with the sham-operated group, the left ventricular (LV) end diastolic pressure (LVEDP), volume (LVV), absolute and relative weight (LVAW, LVRW) in AMI group were all significantly increased (all P < 0.001), while maximum LV pressure rising and dropping rates (+/- dp/dt) and their corrected values by LV systolic pressure (+/- dp/dt/LVSP) were all significantly reduced in the AMI control group (P < 0.01 - 0.001), indicating LVRM occurred and LV systolic and diastolic functions were impaired. Compared with the AMI group, LVEDP, LVV, LVAW and LVRW were all significantly decreased in the three enalapril groups (control P < 0.001), with the reduction of LVEDP, LVV and LVAW being more significant in high-dose than in low-dose enalapril groups (all P < 0.05), and the +/- dp/dt/LVSP were significantly increased only in the high and middle-dose enalapril groups (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONSHigh, middle and low doses of enalapril were all effective in preventing LVRM after AMI in the rat, with low dose enalapril being effective and high dose superior. As for LV functional improvement, only high and middle-dose enalapril were effective.
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; Animals ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Enalapril ; administration & dosage ; pharmacology ; Female ; Myocardial Infarction ; physiopathology ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Ventricular Remodeling ; drug effects