1.Associations between variation of systolic blood pressure and neurological deterioration of ischemic stroke patients
Cheung-Ter Ong ; How-Ran Guo ; Kuo-Chun Sung ; Chi-Shun Wu ; Sheng-Feng Sung ; Yung-Chu Hsu ; Yu-Hsiang Su
Neurology Asia 2010;15(3):217-223
Objectives: To assess the relationship of variation of blood pressure and neurological deterioration
(ND) in ischemic stroke patients. Methods: We recruited patients with the fi rst-ever ischemic stroke
at a teaching hospital. The National Institutes of Health Stoke Score (NIHSS) of each patient was
monitored for 2 months. ND was defi ned as an increase of ≥ 2 points in NIHSS during the fi rst 7
days after stroke. Blood pressure was measured every 6 hours for fi rst 7 days. We analyzed blood
pressure data in the fi rst 36 hours to study the relationship between variation of blood pressure and
ND. Successive variation of systolic (svSBP) and diastolic (svDBP) blood pressure was calculated
as svSBP= |SBPn+1 – SBPn
| and svDBP= |DBPn+1 – DBPn
| respectively. The largest svSBP in the
fi rst 36 hours of hospitalization or before ND was defi ned as maximum variation of systolic blood
pressure (maxvSBP). Then, the mean variation of systolic (mvSBP) and diastolic (mvDBP) blood
pressure was calculated as mvSBP= svSBP/N and mvDBP= svDBP/N respectively. Results: A total
of 121 patients were included in this study, and 38 of them had ND. The mvSBP was higher in the
ND Group (17.9±8.4 mmHg vs. 13.7±4.4 mmHg, p=0.006) but the difference in mvDBP did not
reach statistical signifi cance (9.8±3.5mmHg vs. 8.6±3.0 mmHg p=0.06). The ND Group had a larger
maxvSBP (35.2±17.2 vs. 27.6±11.6 mmHg, p =0.01), which was more frequently over 30mmHg than
that in the stable group (P=0.02).
Conclusions: A large svSBP is associated with an increased risk for ND. The study highlights the
importance of close monitoring of blood pressure in ischemic stroke patients.
2.Can Elderly Patients with Severe Mitral Regurgitation Benefit from Trans-catheter Mitral Valve Repair?
Ching Wei LEE ; Shih Hsien SUNG ; Wei Ming HUANG ; Yi Lin TSAI ; Hsiang Yao CHEN ; Chiao Po HSU ; Chun Che SHIH ; Kuo Piao CHUNG
Korean Circulation Journal 2019;49(6):532-541
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Age is a traditional risk factor for open-heart surgery. The efficacy and safety of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair, using MitraClip (Abbott Vascular), has been demonstrated in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Since octogenarians or older patients are usually deferred to receive open-heart surgery, the main interest of this study is to elucidate the procedural safety and long-term clinical impact of MitraClip in elderly patients. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic severe MR were evaluated by the heart team. For those with high or prohibitive surgical risks, transcatheter mitral valve repair was performed in hybrid operation room. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), blood tests, and six-minute walk test (6MWT) were performed before, 1-month, 6-months, and 1 year after index procedure. RESULTS: A total of 46 consecutive patients receiving MitraClip procedure were enrolled. Nineteen patients (84.2±4.0 years) were over 80-year-old and 27 (73.4±11.1 years) were younger than 80. Compare to baseline, the significant reduction in MR severity was achieved after the procedure and sustained. All the patients benefited from significant improvement in New York Heart Association functional class. The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) increased from 259±114 to 319±92 meters (p=0.03) at 1 year. The overall 1-year survival rate was 80% in the elderly and 88% in those <80 years, p=0.590. Baseline 6MWT was a predictor for all-cause mortality (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.982–0.999; p=0.026) after the MitraClip procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Trans-catheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repairs are safe and have positive clinical impact in subjects with severe MR, even in advanced age.
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Echocardiography
;
Heart
;
Hematologic Tests
;
Humans
;
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
;
Mitral Valve
;
Mortality
;
Risk Factors
;
Survival Rate
3.Can Elderly Patients with Severe Mitral Regurgitation Benefit from Trans-catheter Mitral Valve Repair?
Ching Wei LEE ; Shih Hsien SUNG ; Wei Ming HUANG ; Yi Lin TSAI ; Hsiang Yao CHEN ; Chiao Po HSU ; Chun Che SHIH ; Kuo Piao CHUNG
Korean Circulation Journal 2019;49(6):532-541
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:
Age is a traditional risk factor for open-heart surgery. The efficacy and safety of transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair, using MitraClip (Abbott Vascular), has been demonstrated in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Since octogenarians or older patients are usually deferred to receive open-heart surgery, the main interest of this study is to elucidate the procedural safety and long-term clinical impact of MitraClip in elderly patients.
METHODS:
Patients with symptomatic severe MR were evaluated by the heart team. For those with high or prohibitive surgical risks, transcatheter mitral valve repair was performed in hybrid operation room. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), blood tests, and six-minute walk test (6MWT) were performed before, 1-month, 6-months, and 1 year after index procedure.
RESULTS:
A total of 46 consecutive patients receiving MitraClip procedure were enrolled. Nineteen patients (84.2±4.0 years) were over 80-year-old and 27 (73.4±11.1 years) were younger than 80. Compare to baseline, the significant reduction in MR severity was achieved after the procedure and sustained. All the patients benefited from significant improvement in New York Heart Association functional class. The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) increased from 259±114 to 319±92 meters (p=0.03) at 1 year. The overall 1-year survival rate was 80% in the elderly and 88% in those <80 years, p=0.590. Baseline 6MWT was a predictor for all-cause mortality (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.982–0.999; p=0.026) after the MitraClip procedure.
CONCLUSIONS
Trans-catheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repairs are safe and have positive clinical impact in subjects with severe MR, even in advanced age.
4.The Clinical Outcomes of Different First-Line EGFR-TKIs Plus Bevacizumab in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma
Yen-Hsiang HUANG ; Kuo-Hsuan HSU ; Chun-Shih CHIN ; Jeng-Sen TSENG ; Tsung-Ying YANG ; Kun-Chieh CHEN ; Kang-Yi SU ; Sung-Liang YU ; Jeremy J.W. CHEN ; Gee-Chen CHANG
Cancer Research and Treatment 2022;54(2):434-444
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of various epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus bevacizumab in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients.
Materials and Methods:
From August 2016 to October 2020, we enrolled advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring exon 19 deletion or L858R receiving gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib plus bevacizumab as the first-line treatment for the purposes of analysis.
Results:
A total of 36 patients were included in the final analysis. Three patients received gefitinib, 17 received erlotinib, and 16 received afatinib combined with bevacizumab as the first-line treatment. The objective response rate was 77.8%, and disease control rate was 94.4%. The overall median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.4 months, while the median PFS was 17.1 months in patients with exon 19 deletion, and 16.2 months in patients with L858R mutation (p=0.311). Regarding the use of different EGFR-TKIs, the median PFS was 17.1 months in the erlotinib group and 21.6 months in the afatinib group (p=0.617). In patients with brain metastasis at baseline, the median PFS was 18.9 months in the erlotinib group and 16.4 months in the afatinib group (p=0.747). Amongst patients harboring exon 19 deletion, the median PFS was 16.2 months in the erlotinib group and not-reached in the afatinib group (p=0.141). In patients with L858R mutation, the median PFS was 18.9 months in the erlotinib group and 16.2 months in the afatinib group (p=0.481).
Conclusion
Our research demonstrates that not only erlotinib combined with bevacizumab, but also afatinib plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment, provides solid clinical efficacy in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients.