Adjuvant analgesics refer to a group of drugs that are used not only to treat certain diseases but also to induce analge-sia. Such drugs demonstrate different mechanisms based on the complexity of cancer pain. Thus, opioids, nonsteroidal drugs, and adju-vant analgesics are often combined to control cancer pain. According to the WHO three-step analgesic ladder, adjuvant analgesics can be used at any cancer stage, and the usage of these drugs combined with opioids can reduce the required dosages of these pain relievers, thereby alleviating the adverse reactions associated with opioid use. Moreover, these drugs are particularly suitable for neuropathic pain patients who are not fully sensitive to opioids. The commonly used adjuvant analgesics include antidepressants, anticonvulsants, local administration drugs, corticosteroids, and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists. Various adjuvant analgesics also differ in usage and dosage based on primary disease treatment. Therefore, clinical doctors should determine the adverse reactions, proper dos-age, and subsequent amount of dosage to be added in a few days or weeks to achieve balance between the desired effect and adverse re-actions.

To study the general characteristics of cancer pain and to improve cancer pain diagnosis and treatment lev-el by prospective and open cross-sectional assessment of the clinical characteristics of patients with moderate to severe cancer pain. Methods:Patients with moderate to severe cancer pain were observed upon initial admission to the hospital from December 2012 to De-cember 2013. We assessed pain intensity, location, characteristics, and predisposing and mitigating factors and classified the pain by pathophysiology. Results:A total of 310 patients with moderate (101 cases, 32.58%) and severe (209 cases, 67.42%) pains were as-sessed. The top five cancers identified were lung cancer (102 cases, 32.90%), colorectal cancer (30 cases, 9.68%), pancreatic cancer (27 cases, 8.71%), breast cancer (24 cases, 7.74%), and gastric cancer (20 cases, 6.54%). These patients reported 533 cancer pain locations, including waist (132 cases), abdominal (125 cases), chest (88 cases), lower limb (71 cases), shoulder, neck, and upper limb (47 cases), pelvis (33 cases), perineal area (23 cases), and head and face (14 cases). The pain location of the pancreatic cancer was 90.63%consis-tent with the primary tumor site. The pathophysiology of the pain was classified as follows:bone pain (145 cases, 27.20%), visceral pain (138 cases, 25.89%), soft tissue pain (126 cases, 23.64%), and neuropathic pain (124 cases, 23.27%). The incidence of visceral pain in pancreatic cancer was 92.59%. Conclusion:A variety of common malignancies could cause moderate to severe pain, especially lung cancer. The clinical manifestation of pancreatic cancer pain is visceral pain. The location of this cancer was consistent with the pri-mary tumor site. No apparent specificity was observed in other cancer types.

Neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) is an effective method used to alleviate upper abdominal pain or back pain caused by pancreatic cancer and other malignancies. NCPB can relieve cancer pain to improve the quality of life and cause fewer side effects than conventional analgesic drugs. This article systemically reviewed NCPB methodology and research progress in clinical appli-cations.

Objective:To compare efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) with radiotherapy and radiotherapy alone for bone me-tastasis pain. Methods:A total of 247 bone metastasis patients with pain were analyzed. The radiotherapy group comprised 158 cases, whereas the combination group comprised 89 cases. We mainly observed the effect of pain treatment, behavioral states, and im-proved emotional condition. The side effects and complications were also investigated. Daily medicine consumption of background pain treatment was observed between the two groups. Analysis was done by SPSS 17.0 statistical software. Numerical variables were analyzed using t test and comparisons between groups used chi-square test. Results:The VAS scores of radiotherapy group decreased from 8.12±1.45 to 3.06±1.68 after treatment (P<0.05), and combination group VAS scores from 8.46±1.73 to 2.45±1.47 (P<0.05). The time to pain relief following PVP and radiotherapy were 1.63±0.81 and 8.56±2.87 days, respectively (P<0.001). The breakthrough pain frequency was 4.56 ± 1.98 times/day, which decreased to 1.57 ± 0.98 times/day after PVP (P<0.05). By contrast, the breakthrough pain frequency was 4.73±2.24 times/day before treatment, which decreased to 3.56±1.56 times/day after radiotherapy. No serious compli-cations were observed in the two groups. The depression and anxiety mood in the combination group improved after treatment. Daily medicine consumption in radiotherapy group increased after therapy. However, daily medicine consumption in combination group was reduced after therapy. Conclusion:PVP with radiotherapy can effectively relieve bone metastasis pain and improve patients' quality of life and it is worthy of promotion in clinical practice.

Cancer pain can seriously disturb patients′quality of life.Intractable cancer pain not ame-nable to standard analgesics is a horrifying truth in parts of the patients.Interventional pain management tech-niques can be an effective alternative for those patients.Based on the evidence of evidence-based medicine, celiac plexus block or splanchnic nerve block are recommended for the management of upper abdominal cancer pain,pelvic cancer pain can be managed with superior hypogastric plexus block,and back pain due to vertebral compression fractures with tumor invasion can be managed with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Intercostal nerve block for chest wall cancer pain,ganglion impar block and saddle block for perineal pain due to pelvic tumors should be used only in the context of an experimental study or in cases of compassionate use with no other available forms of effective pain relief.

Neuropathic cancer pain (NCP) arises from physical or chemical damage to peripheral or central neurons or in the neural conduction system.The mechanisms of NCP include pain directly related to tumor involvement,pain associated with chemotherapy,radiotherapy and surgery,neuropathic syndromes associated with paraneoplastic syndromes,inflammation and other factors.A detailed history and careful physical examination are important means of diagnosis of NCP.The clinical evaluation of NCP should use standardized pain assessment scale.Till now,the treatments of NCP include opioid combined with auxiliary analgesic drugs,interventional treatment and gene treatment.Deciding treatment strategies according to the pathogenesis of NCP,multidisciplinary collaboration,combined therapy with different analgesic drugs and technologies are the therapeutic directions for NCP.

A bismuth-antimony fire assay method for the preconcentration of ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, iridium and platinum in copper-nickel sulfide ores was developed. 40. 0 g bismuth trioxide, 25. 0 g boric acid, 10. 0 g sodium carbonate and 1. 00 g starch were mixed with 10. 0 g sample in a 120 mL porcelain bowl, which was put in a furnace at 850 ℃. After 20 min the temperature was raised to 1000 ℃ and held for another 40 min, and then the bowl was taken out, with the slag poured, which left the bismuth button to air cooling. A two-step cupellation procedure was developed. During the first step, the bismuth button was cupellated in a magnesia cupel until its diameter reached 5 mm or so, then it was transferred to a crucible cover containing 20 g melting antimony and kept cupellating, at last a bead with a diameter of 1 mm was obtained. The bead was microwave-digested, after cooling down to room temperature, the solvent of which was transferred to a volumetric flask and diluted to 10 ml with water. Pt and Pd were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry ( ICP-AES), while 99 Ru, 103 Rh, 191 Ir were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), with 115 In, 185 Re as internal standard. RSD (n = 12) of the analysis results of five platinum group elements ( PGEs) in standard reference material GBW07196 ranged from 7. 04% to 9. 48% . Under the condition of 10 g sample, the detection limits (ng / g) for PGEs are 0. 027 for Ru, 0. 016 for Rh, 0. 11 for Pd, 0. 10 for Ir and 0. 11 for Pt. The method was applied to the determination of PGEs in GBW07194, GBW07195, GBW07196 with satisfactory results.

Objective To investigate the prevalence of BK virus(BKV) infection in renal transplant recipients and the methods for its clinical diagnosis and treatment.Methods The urine and blood samples of 64 renal transplant recipients were taken for the BKV cytological and PCR tests.Five clinical factors were investigated to find the etiologic risks of BKV infection in renal transplant recipients.Four BKV infected recipients received experimental treatment.Results The occurrence of urine decoy cell,BKV viruria and viremia in all patients was(28.7 %),(17.2 %) and(6.3 %),respectively.The occurrence of urine decoy cell in serum creatinine(SCR) level elevated recipients was higher than that in SCR stable recipients(P=(0.04)).No significant relationships were found between the five clinical factors(gender,age,induction therapy,acute rejection episode,renal function after transplantation) and the occurrence of urine decoy cell,viruria and viremia.Ganciclovir treatment showed effective in four BKV infected recipients.Conclusions BKV monitoring is necessary for those recipients with evaluated SCR levels after renal transplantation.BKV viremia test can be used as a screening test.The efficacy of ganciclovir in the treatment of BKV infection should be further investigated.

Bibliometrics ; China ; Pneumoconiosis

Objective To determine the relationship between dietary fiber intake and risk of prostate cancer.Methods Electronic databases including PubMed,EMBase,Cochrane library,China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI),Wanfang and CBMwere searched to find eligible studies.Random-effects relative risk (RR)and its corresponding 95%CI were used.Besides,random-effects dose-response analyses were also performed to clarify the dose-response relations.Results Ten studies,including five cohort studies and five case-control studies,were eligible and included in this Meta-analysis.The pooled RR of prostate cancer for the highest compared with the lowest dietary fiber intake was 0.87 (95%CI:0.77-0.99,Z =2.10,P =0.035). In addition,pooled estimated data showed that risk of prostate cancer was significantly associated with soluble fiber (RR =0.78,95%CI:0.64-0.95,Z =2.45,P =0.014)and insoluble fiber (RR =0.65,95%CI:0.45-0.88,Z =2.79,P =0.005),but not with fruit,vegetable and cereal fiber intake.However,in dose-response analysis,no significant association was reported (RR =0.996,95%CI:0.989-1.002).Sensitivity analysis showed that the overall results were relatively stable,and omission of any single study had little effect on the combined results.Conclusion Dietary fiber intake is negative related to the risk of prostate cancer. Intake of dietary fiber is recommended to prevent prostate cancer.Considering the limitations of the included studies,more well-designed prospective studies will be needed to confirm our findings.