Objective: The Japanese risk management plan (RMP) contains the risk minimization action plans for important potential risks of drugs.  One of the basic risk minimization action plans is reminding on package insert; however, we found that some potential risks were not described in package inserts.  In this study, we investigated the description of potential risks on package inserts.
Design: Document analysis.
Methods: We collected all posted RMP documents and the package inserts of corresponding products from the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency website on January 31, 2015 and investigated the risk minimization action plans of important potential risk items and whether the items had been described in each package insert.
Results: Of 268 important potential risk items in 81 products, 56 items were not described on package insert.  The major reason for not including the risk items on the package insert was “causality was not indicated sufficiently” and some items had no written reason.
Conclusion: About 20% of important potential risks are not described in package inserts.  Because most post-marketing pharmacovigilance plans depend on spontaneous reporting by healthcare personnel, description on package insert, the most frequently referred drug information resource, should be considered.

Introduction: Patients of end-stage heart failure often develop dyspnea. Although morphine is used for dyspnea, these patients are often inappropriate group for using morphine due to renal failure. Case: A seventy-year-old male with end-stage heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy developed dyspnea. We used continuous oxycodone infusion for dyspnea with small dose as an alternative to morphine due to renal failure. His dyspnea was relieved in dose-dependent without heart failure recovery. Conclusion: Oxycodone may be an alternative therapy for dyspnea with end-stage heart failure with renal failure.

Background: Gingyo-gedoku-san (GGGS) is an herbal medicine approved for upper respiratory infections in Japan. We conducted an open-label, multi-center, prospective trial, comparing GGGS with oseltamivir in patients with influenza and influenza-like illness (ILI) as a pilot study.
Methods: Subjects were healthy persons aged between 16 and 40, and were enrolled from January 12, 2010 to March 24, 2011. Fifteen patients were enrolled in this trial (8 and 7 for GGGS and oseltamivir, respectively). RT-PCR was positive for pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in 10 patients. The patients were provided with either GGGS or oseltamivir for 5 days. The primary outcome was mortality and/or hospitalization 7 days after the initial diagnosis. Body temperature and other clinical characteristics were also evaluated.
Results: All patients recovered from illness without complication or hospitalization. The mean time to resolve symptoms for the GGGS and oseltamivir groups was 3.9 days and 3.3 days, respectively (p=0.43). The GGGS group appeared to have a smaller symptom score AUC than the oseltamivir group, (p=0.26). Time to recover activity level appeared to be shorter in the GGGS group (p=0.10), with shorter time to recover health status (p=0.02). Sub-group analysis on patients with positive PCR showed similar results between the two groups.
Conclusion: GGGS was associated with symptom improvements resembling oseltamivir for both influenza and ILI. Randomized controlled trials involving larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results.