We present a successful case of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm with left-sided inferior vena cava (IVC). A 74-year-old man, with complaints of abdominal pain and loss of consciousness, was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography revealed a ruptured aneurysm of the abdominal aorta, and the operation was performed immediately. At the operation, left-sided IVC was recognized to cross anteriorly over the abdominal aorta at the usual level of the left renal vein. Proximal anastomosis was safely performed with careful mobilization of the IVC in the appropriate direction. The patient was in acute renal failure after this procedure, with 9 days of continuous hemodiafiltration, but he recovered to discharge on the 46th postoperative day with normal renal function. The cardiovascular surgeon should be familiar with anomalies of the IVC in performing procedures of the abdominal aorta, especially in emergency operations, even if they are rare.

Here we present a long-term follow-up of 50 operative survivors, who underwent surgery between December 1975 and March 1994 for the placement of an extracardiac conduit. Twenty-six patients received conduits with various valves (VC group). The valves used were the Hancock valve in 9 patients, the St. Jude Medical valve in 5, and a valved roll made of equine pericardium in 10. Twenty-four patients received valveless Dacron conduits (NVC group). Another group of patients, also with discontinuity between the right ventricle and the pulmonary artery, who were operated on without the use of a conduit, is presented here for comparison (NCR group: 16 patients). The follow-up period for the NCR group was shorter than for the other groups. There were a total of 4 late deaths in the conduit groups, and none in the NCR group. Freedom from reoperation due to conduit stenosis was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. In the VC group, freedom from reoperation at 5, 10, and 15 years, was 87.8%, 50.8%, and 31.2% respectively. In the NVC group, freedom from reoperation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 100%, 95.7%, and 60.4%. There were statistically significant differences between the values in these 2 groups. In the NCR group, only one patient (6.25%) underwent reoperation due to stenosis in the right ventricular outflow tract. Although the rate of freedom from reoperation was lower in the valveless conduit group than in the valved conduit group, the majority of patients who receive a conduit between the right ventricle and the pulmonary artery will eventually require reoperation. Avoiding the use of an extracardiac conduit, and creating continuity between the right ventricle and pulmonary artery with autologous tissue is a useful alternative and may reduce the need for reoperation.

A 63-year-old man had been receiving medical treatment for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) for 20 years. Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) had often occurred over the previous 2 years in spite of the administration of antiarrhythmic drugs. He therefore received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). However, his symptoms did not improve thus dilated-phase HCM was diagnosed. Because sustained VT often occurred subsequently, the ICD had to be frequently used. An electrophysiological study (EPS) using the CARTO electroanatomical mapping system revealed the earliest activation site to be in the posterolateral wall of the left ventricle (LV). VT did not stop despite 2 endocardial catheter ablation procedures. Therefore, the VT foci was thought to be a reentry circuit on the epicardial side of the posterolateral LV wall. A part of the posterolateral LV wall that involved the reentry circuit was therefore resected. Since undergoing this surgical procedure, the patient has experienced no recurrence of VT during a follow-up period of 14 months.