Objective To evaluate the impact of nutrition support on the clinical outcomes of gastrointestinal disease patients at nutritional risk and explore the the cost-effectiveness of various nutrition support options.Methods A prospective cohort study was designed.The patients who met the predetermined inclusion criteria were followed up during the hospital stay.Nutritional risk was determined using the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 on admission.The information with respect to nutritional support,occurrence and treatment of complications,length of hospital stay,and discharge destination was monitored and recorded.The direct costs of nutritional support and the costs of diagnosing and treating complications were calculated after discharge.Infectious complication-free patient was used as the effectiveness indicator in the cost-effectiveness analysis.Results Patients who had received nutrition support had significantly lower infectious complications incidence (6.8％ vs.19.6％,x2 =9.0,P=0.003) and significantly higher total hospitalization costs (P =0.0001).The adjusted (by general linear model) cost of parenteral nutrition (PN) cohort,enteral nutrition (EN) cohort,PN combined EN cohort,and the cohort without nutritional support were 5635,1212,5220,and 1339 China Yuan,respectively.The incremental cost effectiveness ratios were 36 101,-794,and 33 748 China Yuan for PN,EN,and PN-EN combination groups,respectively.Conclusions For the patients at nutritional risk,nutritional support can remarkably reduce the incidence of infectious complications.The preliminary resuits of cost-effectiveness:due to lack of enough data required by health economic professional,it can not be cited directly.

Objecflve To determine the prevalences of nutritional risk,undemutrition,overweight,and obesity as well as nutritional support and the changes of nutritional risks from admission to discharge or over a two-week period.Methods A consecutive sampling was performed.Dam were collected from general surgical depart-ments in three Beijing teaching hospitals from March to July in 2007.Patients were screened using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002(NRS2002)on admission and two weeks after admission(or discharge).The nutritional supper apphcation during hospital stay was recorded.NRS2002 score≥3 was classified as nutritional risk.BMI<1 8.5kg/m2 with impaired genend condition was defined as undemutrition.Results Among 300 enrolled patients,the NRS2002 WaS completed by 99.0%(297/300)of all patients.The nutritional risk and the prevalence of under_nutrition,overweight,and obesity was 30.0%,8.1%,38.3%,and 9.4%,respectively at admission.Fifty of 90(62.2%)patients who were at nutritional risk received nutritional support while 40 of 210(19.O%)non-risk patients received nutritional support.Especially among major abdominal surgery patients,56 of 90(71.6%)pa-tients who were at nutritional risk received nutritional supper while 35 of 81(43.2%)non-risk pafients received nutritional support.The prevalence of nutritional risk changed from 30.0%to 35.8%(X2=2.271,P=0.132).Conclusions NRS2002 is a feasible nutritional risk screening tool among general surgical pafienm in selected Bei-jing teaching hospitals.Nutritional support is somehow inappropriately apphed in general surgical hospitalized pa-tients.The prevalence of nutritional risk remains unchanged in general surgical patients during hospitalization.