1.Effect of early problem-based learning tutorial education on medical students' views about learning
Masahisa HORIUCHI ; Teruto HASHIGUCHI ; Masamichi GOTO ; Kiyotaka YOSHIIE ; Hiroaki YAMAOKA ; Yoshihisa UMEKITA ; Chihaya KORIYAMA ; Hiroyuki IMANAKA ; Koichiro USUKU ; Hiroshi ODA
Medical Education 2008;39(4):267-271
1) In problem-based learning (PBL) tutorials during the2nd year, general symptoms (fatigue, weight change, bleeding, fever, pain, and edema) were chosen as subjects.Changes in the students'way of thinking about how to learn were evaluated before and after PBL tutorials.
2) After tutorials students were significantly more likely to believe that their participation in tutorials was a more effective way of learning. The students'views after tutorials on listening to lectures differed between2006and2007.
3) We conclude that PBL tutorials affect medical students'views about learning.
2.HFA-PEFF scores: prognostic value in heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction
Koichi EGASHIRA ; Daisuke SUETA ; Takashi KOMORITA ; Eiichiro YAMAMOTO ; Hiroki USUKU ; Takanori TOKITSU ; Koichiro FUJISUE ; Taiki NISHIHARA ; Fumi OIKE ; Masafumi TAKAE ; Shinsuke HANATANI ; Seiji TAKASHIO ; Miwa ITO ; Kenshi YAMANAGA ; Satoshi ARAKI ; Hirofumi SOEJIMA ; Koichi KAIKITA ; Kenichi MATSUSHITA ; Kenichi TSUJITA
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2022;37(1):96-108
Background/Aims:
The Heart Failure Association (HFA)-PEFF score is recognized as a simple method to diagnose heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between HFA-PEFF scores and cardiovascular outcomes in HFpEF patients.
Methods:
A total of 502 consecutive HFpEF patients were prospectively observed for up to 1,500 days. Cardiovascular outcomes were compared between two groups of patients, defined by their HFA-PEFF scores: those who scored 2–4 (the intermediate-score group) and those who scored 5–6 group (the high-score group). Overall, 236 cardiovascular events were observed during the follow-up period (median, 1,159 days).
Results:
Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there were significant differences in composite cardiovascular events and HF-related events between the intermediate-score group and the high-score group (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the HFA-PEFF scores significantly predicted future HF-related events (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11 to 2.50; p = 0.014); receiver operating characteristic analysis confirmed this relationship (area under the curve, 0.633; 95% CI, 0.574 to 0.692; p < 0.001). The cutoff HFA-PEFF score for the identification of HF-related events was 4.5. Decision curve analysis revealed that combining the HFA-PEFF score with conventional prognostic factors improved the prediction of HF-related events.
Conclusions
HFA-PEFF scores may be useful for predicting HF-related events in HFpEF patients.