1.Total percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair (pEVAR): the initial experience in Hospital Kuala Lumpur
Benjamin DK Leong ; Naresh Govindarajanthran ; Hafizan Mohd Tajri ; Kia Lean Tan ; Hanif Hussein ; Zainal Ariffin Azizi
The Medical Journal of Malaysia 2017;72(2):91-93
Introduction: There has been a paradigm shift in the
treatment of AAA with the advent of endovascular aneurysm
repair (EVAR). Rapid progress and evolution of
endovascular technology has brought forth smaller profile
devices and closure devices. Total percutaneous
endovascular aneurysm repair (pEVAR) involves the usage
of suture-mediated closure devices (SMCDs) at vascular
access sites to avoid a traditional surgical cutdown.
Materials And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our
experience of pEVAR between April 2013 and July 2014.
Primary success of the procedure was defined as closure of
a common femoral artery (CFA) arteriotomy without the need
for any secondary surgical or endovascular procedure
within 30 days.
Results: In total there were 10 pEVAR cases performed in the
study period, one case in Queen Elizabeth Hospital during
visiting vascular service. Patients have a mean age of 73.4
year old (66-77 year old) The mean abdominal aortic size was
7.2 cm (5.6-10.0cm). Mean femoral artery diameter was 9.0
mm on the right and 8.9 mm on the left. Mean duration of
surgery was 119 minutes (98- 153 minutes). 50% of patients
were discharged at post-operative day one, 30%- day two
and 20%- day three. Primary success was achieved in 9
patients (90%) or in 19 CFA closures (95%). No major
complication was reported.
Discussion: We believe that with proper selection of patients
undergoing EVAR, pEVAR offers a better option of vascular
access with shorter operative time, less post- operative
pain, shorter hospital stay and minimises the potential
complications of a conventional femoral cutdown.
2.Academy of Medicine-Ministry of Health Clinical Practice Guidelines: assessment and management of infertility at primary healthcare level.
Seong Feei LOH ; Rachna AGARWAL ; Jerry K CHAN ; Sing Joo CHIA ; Li Wei CHO ; Lean Huat LIM ; Matthew Sie Kuei LAU ; Sheila Kia Ee LOH ; Marianne Sybille HENDRICKS ; Suresh NAIR ; Joanne Hui Min QUAH ; Heng Hao TAN ; P C WONG ; Cheng Toh YEONG ; Su Ling YU
Singapore medical journal 2014;55(2):58-quiz 66
The Academy of Medicine (AMS) and Ministry of Health (MOH) have developed the clinical practice guidelines on Assessment and Management of Infertility at Primary Healthcare Level to provide doctors and patients in Singapore with evidence-based treatment for infertility. This article reproduces the introduction and executive summary (with recommendations from the guidelines) from the AMS-MOH clinical practice guidelines on Assessment and Management of Infertility at Primary Healthcare Level, for the information of SMJ readers. Chapters and page numbers mentioned in the reproduced extract refer to the full text of the guidelines, which are available from the Ministry of Health website: http://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/healthprofessionalsportal/doctors/guidelines/cpg_medical/2013/cpgmed_infertility.html. The recommendations should be used with reference to the full text of the guidelines. Following this article are multiple choice questions based on the full text of the guidelines.
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Female
;
Guidelines as Topic
;
Humans
;
Infertility
;
diagnosis
;
therapy
;
Male
;
Practice Guidelines as Topic
;
Primary Health Care
;
methods
;
standards
;
Public Health
;
standards
;
Singapore