“Cardiac Cycle: The First Step, ” which discretely, non-ambiguously, and accurately presents basic essential information on the cardiac cycle, was compared with conventional material in terms of educational efficiency. Twenty-six first-year medical students were randomly assigned to either material. The conventional group was presented with a standard textbook with a typical figure and text. The students were blinded as to the origin of the materials. After self-study, the same quiz (30 two-item choice questions asking basic essential information) was given to both groups and was scored by a blinded rater. The number of correct answers was 25.7±3.7 (mean±SD) in the conventional group and 29.4±1.1 in the ‘first-step group’(p<0.01).

Methods: A total of 224 consecutive patients with OVFs aged ≥65 years who received treatment within 2 weeks after the occurrence of injury were enrolled. The patients were followed up for 6 months thereafter. The criteria for evaluating the degree of independence were applied to evaluate ADLs. Multivariable analysis with a logistic regression model was performed to evaluate the risk factors for ADL decline. Results: In total, 49/224 patients (21.9%) showed a decline in ADLs. Of these, 23/116 patients (19.8%) in the rest group and 26/108 patients (24.1%) in the no-rest group experienced a decline in ADLs. In the logistic regression analyses, a diffuse low signal on T2- weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (odds ratio, 5.78; 95% confidence interval, 2.09–16.0; p=0.0007) and vertebral instability (odds ratio, 3.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.32–11.4; p=0.0135) were identified as independent factors in the rest and no-rest groups, respectively. Conclusions In patients with acute OVFs, a diffuse low signal on T2-weighted MRI and severe vertebral instability were independently associated with ADL decline in patients treated with and without initial bed rest, respectively.

Objective: Whether or not emergent decompression/fusion surgery for paralysis caused by metastatic spinal tumors of unknown origin improves patient neurological outcome and survival remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of emergent decompression/fusion surgery for paralysis caused by spinal tumors of unknown or not previously diagnosed origin.Patients and Methods: Data from the medical records of 11 patients with spinal tumors of unknown origin (study group) were compared with those of 15 patients with metastatic spinal tumors of known origin (control group). The outcome measures were postoperative performance status, motor function evaluated with the Frankel grade, and actual survival after surgery as compared with the estimated survival calculated using the Tokuhashi score. χ2 analyses were performed to evaluate differences between the groups.Results: The mean performance status was 3.6 preoperatively, which improved to 2.9 postoperatively (P<0.05), in the unknown origin group and 3.6 preoperatively, which improved to 2.7 postoperatively (P<0.05), in the control group. Seven patients (64%) in the unknown origin group showed improvement in paralysis by ≥1 Frankel grade. By contrast, only 4 patients (27%) in the control group showed improvement in paralysis. The unknown origin group tended to show better improvement (P=0.05). All the patients in the unknown origin group underwent adjuvant therapy after definitive diagnosis following surgery. The unknown origin group showed a slight tendency toward better survival than toward the estimated survival.Conclusion: Emergent decompression/fusion surgery for patients with paralysis caused by metastatic tumors of unknown origin is potentially useful for diagnosing tumor origin and improving neurological outcomes and performance status, and thus for extending survival.