1.Performance of the curriculum for communication skills for breaking bad news: Evaluation with Common Achievement Tests OSCE and advanced OSCE
Naoko IWASAKI ; Hikaru NAGAHARA ; Masanao TERAMURA ; Noriko KOJIMAHARA ; Masatoshi KAWANA ; Naomi HIZUKA ; Toshimasa YOSHIOKA ; Makiko OSAWA ; Keiko SHIRATORI
Medical Education 2010;41(2):103-109
Skills for breaking bad news (BBN) at the medical interview station were evaluated with the advanced objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). To clarify performances at this station, we compared the scores at this station with those of the Common Achievement Tests OSCE controlled by the Common Achievements Test Organization (CATO). The subjects were a group of students tested at an interval of 1 year 4 months during their clinical clerkships.1) Raters (mostly postdoctorate fellows) played simulated patients after they had been trained to ensure standardization.2) Students who had high scores for BBN skills on the advanced OSCE also had high scores for both the behavior part and the knowledge part of the total evaluation.3) In contrast, students who had high scores for BBN skills on the advanced OSCE did not always have high scores on the Common Achievement Tests OSCE, suggesting the importance of clinical clerkships between these 2 OSCEs.
2.Clinical Characteristics of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients With Heartburn
Satsuki TAKAHASHI ; Tomoaki MATSUMURA ; Tatsuya KANEKO ; Mamoru TOKUNAGA ; Hirotaka OURA ; Tsubasa ISHIKAWA ; Ariki NAGASHIMA ; Wataru SHIRATORI ; Naoki AKIZUE ; Yuki OHTA ; Atsuko KIKUCHI ; Mai FUJIE ; Keiko SAITO ; Kenichiro OKIMOTO ; Daisuke MARUOKA ; Tomoo NAKAGAWA ; Makoto ARAI ; Jun KATO ; Naoya KATO
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2021;27(4):545-554
Background/Aims:
Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) contribute to the pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, the causes of EMDs and their impact on gastroesophageal reflux disease-associated symptoms remain unknown. This study aims to elucidate clinical features associated with various types of EMDs in patients with heartburn symptoms.
Methods:
Of the 511 patients who underwent high-resolution manometry, 394 who were evaluated for heartburn symptoms were examined. Patients subjected to high-resolution manometry were classified into 4 groups: outflow obstruction group, hypermotility group, hypomotility group, and normal motility group. Symptoms were evaluated using 3 questionnaires. Patient characteristics and symptoms for each EMD type were compared with those of the normal motility group.
Results:
Of the 394 patients, 193 (48.9%) were diagnosed with EMDs, including 71 with outflow obstruction, 15 with hypermotility, and 107 with hypomotility. The mean dysphagia score was significantly higher in each of the 3 EMD groups compared with those with normal motility. The mean acid reflux and dyspepsia scores were significantly lower in the outflow obstruction group (P < 0.05). The mean body mass index and median Brinkman index were significantly higher in the hypermotility group (P = 0.001 and P = 0.018, respectively), whereas the mean diarrhea and constipation scores were significantly lower in the hypomotility group (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
The results of our study indicate that different EMDs have distinct characteristics. Cigarette smoking and high body mass index were associated with esophageal hypermotility. Assessment of the dysphagia symptom scores may help identify patients with EMDs.
3.Clinical Characteristics of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Patients With Heartburn
Satsuki TAKAHASHI ; Tomoaki MATSUMURA ; Tatsuya KANEKO ; Mamoru TOKUNAGA ; Hirotaka OURA ; Tsubasa ISHIKAWA ; Ariki NAGASHIMA ; Wataru SHIRATORI ; Naoki AKIZUE ; Yuki OHTA ; Atsuko KIKUCHI ; Mai FUJIE ; Keiko SAITO ; Kenichiro OKIMOTO ; Daisuke MARUOKA ; Tomoo NAKAGAWA ; Makoto ARAI ; Jun KATO ; Naoya KATO
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2021;27(4):545-554
Background/Aims:
Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) contribute to the pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. However, the causes of EMDs and their impact on gastroesophageal reflux disease-associated symptoms remain unknown. This study aims to elucidate clinical features associated with various types of EMDs in patients with heartburn symptoms.
Methods:
Of the 511 patients who underwent high-resolution manometry, 394 who were evaluated for heartburn symptoms were examined. Patients subjected to high-resolution manometry were classified into 4 groups: outflow obstruction group, hypermotility group, hypomotility group, and normal motility group. Symptoms were evaluated using 3 questionnaires. Patient characteristics and symptoms for each EMD type were compared with those of the normal motility group.
Results:
Of the 394 patients, 193 (48.9%) were diagnosed with EMDs, including 71 with outflow obstruction, 15 with hypermotility, and 107 with hypomotility. The mean dysphagia score was significantly higher in each of the 3 EMD groups compared with those with normal motility. The mean acid reflux and dyspepsia scores were significantly lower in the outflow obstruction group (P < 0.05). The mean body mass index and median Brinkman index were significantly higher in the hypermotility group (P = 0.001 and P = 0.018, respectively), whereas the mean diarrhea and constipation scores were significantly lower in the hypomotility group (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
The results of our study indicate that different EMDs have distinct characteristics. Cigarette smoking and high body mass index were associated with esophageal hypermotility. Assessment of the dysphagia symptom scores may help identify patients with EMDs.