0.05 as compared with those in the healthy): RI and PI decreased in the sequence of follicular phase,early luteal phase and middle luteal phase,and then rose up in the late luteal phase(P

BACKGROUND: Posterior lumbar non-fusion devices have been developed to control vertebral column movement, change load pattern of instability segment, restrict abnormal action, as well as avoid adjacent segment degeneration.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficiency of Wallis dynamic stabilization system in the treatment of lumbar vertebrae instability.METHODS: Ten cases suffering from lumbar instability were selected, including 3 males and 7 females, aged 43-65 years. One patient sustained L_(1/2) and L_(4/5) segmental instability, one was L_(2/3) and another was L_(3/4), and the others were L_(4/5). Two patients complicated with lumbar disc herniation and 7 patients combined with lumbar spinal stenosis at the same affected segment, and 3 patients associated with lumbar spinal stenosis at adjacent segment. All unstable segments were treated with decompression, posterior implantation of Wallis dynamic stabilization system. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores for low back pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. In addition, therange of motion (ROM) at the instrumented segment and adjacent segments and posterior disc height (PDH) in standing and extension position at L_(4/5) segment were also measured.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: All the patients were followed-up for 2-13 months, mean 9.2 months. The mean operation duration was 128 minutes (90-185 minutes), with bleeding volume of 264 Ml (50-600 Ml). Sings and symptoms of all patients were improved significantly after operation, except one patient with recurrence of L_(4/5) lumbar spinal stenosis at 3 month after surgery, whose symptoms relieved by revision with fenestration and decompression. The postoperative VAS was dramatically decreased than that of preoperation (P=0.003); the JOA score was obviously increased (P=0.002), and the ODI score was decreased (p=0.008). The postoperative range of motion decreased significantly (P<0.05). However, there was no obviously difference between preoperative and postoperative L_(3/4), L_5/S_1 and posterior disc height (P>0.05). Good clinical results can be achieved by surgical intervention with Wallis dynamic stabilization system in treating lumbar vertebrae instability.

ObjectiveThe aim in this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the ball tip probe technique in placing pedicle screws in patients.MethodsFrom May 2009 to June 2010,we used ball tip probe technique in pedicle screw placement in patients with scoliosis,spondylolisthesis,spinal fractures and other diseases.The ball tip probe consisted of a metal shaft with a metal ball-shaped tip whose size included 1.5,2.5,3.0,3.5 mm in diameter.The ball tip probe with a diameter of 1.5mm owned a high rigidity and certain flexibility.Ball tip probe technique:A high speed bur was used to remove cortical bone and create a starting point,and then the ball tip probes is tapped gently by a hammer for making a guide hole through the pedicle into the vertebral body.The accuracy of the pedicle screw placements was evaluated on postoperative axial CT scanning The pedicle screw placements was compared between the the ball tip probe group and conventional freehand technique group.ResultsThree hundred and twelve screws were evaluated in the ball tip group and 276 in the conventional freehand group.All the screws (100％) were in the desired pedicle in the ball tip group and 215 (78％) in the conventional group.In the conventional group,23 screws(8.3％) were classified as medial violation; 38(13.7％) as lateral violation.A significant difference was determined between the 2 groups regarding the pedicle breaches.No vascular,pulmonary,or neurological injuries caused by pedicle screws placement was found in either group.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the accuracy and reliability of the ball tip probe technique in pedicle screw placement.This technique can probably reduce the risk of complications of screw misplacements.

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of monosegmental pedicle instrumentation in management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods A total of 67 patients with traumatic thora-columbar burst fractures (type A3.1 and A3.2) were treated with monosegmental pedicle instrumentation in our department from October 2003 to February 2008. Imageologic effect was observed by measuring sagittal index and wedge index via X-ray and clinical outcomes evaluated by using low back outcome score. Results All operations were performed successfully, with average operation duration of 93 mi-nutes and average intraoperative blood loss of 157 ml. Of all, 65 patients were followed up for 4-27 months (average 19.8 months), which showed that all the patients achieved bony fusion, with no implant failure except for one with screw loosening. The sagittal index and wedge index were 13.06°and 42.9% preoperatively and 4.47° and 21.78% postoperatively, with statistical difference (P <0.01). The final follow-up showed no significant correction loss except for two patients (P < 0.05). The low back outcome scores of all patients at follow-up were improved significantly (P < 0.05). Conclusions Monoseg-mental pedicle instrumentation has advantages of minimal invasion, short operative duration, less blood loss and less vertebral motion segment loss and hence is an effective and reliable operative technique for thoracolumbar burst fractures.