The concordance rate between the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) evaluators and the SP evaluation evaluators, in the analyses conducted during the past two years was investigated and compared by the acupuncture department at the College for Japanese Judo-Therapy Acupuncture and Moxibustion Therapy.
The subjects were third year students who sat for the OSCE during FY 2004-FY 2005, and consisted of thirteen and thirty-two students, respectively. Four stations were set up which were comprised of medical interviews, physical examinations, and practical skill evaluations on acupuncture, and moxibustion.
The concordance rate at each station was compared, and the improvements in these rates could be seen particularly for physical examinations and practical skills on acupuncture stations. The relationship between the evaluator and the SP was that a correlation between the medical interview evaluator and the SP evaluation was recognized
Improvements were due to segmentation and clarification of the assessment items, more meetings being held, and simulated trials conducted prior to the actual examination. These factors lead to a comprehensive interpretation of the manual.
However, a correlation between the evaluator of the practical skills for acupuncture and the SP evaluation was not recognized. Therefore, it is vital to include the assessment of SP evaluation, and ensure it is performed uniformly.

We report a clinical study conducted to investigate the effects of Electric Field Therapy (EFT) generated by HEALTHTRON on the stiffness in the neck and shoulder area. In Japan, most cases of stiffness in the neck and shoulder area are caused by painfully hypertonic muscles due to various causes such as cervical damage, mechanical stress, disordered cutaneous sensation and psychogenic stress. Internal disorders can also be significant causes of the painful stiffness in the neck and shoulder area. Subjects were 62 outpatients with chief complaints of stiffness in the neck and shoulder area. Informed consent was obtained from each subject. The patients with organic and/or pathological changes in the muscloskeletal system, mental disorder, or internal disease were not included in this study according to the exclusion criteria for feasible focus in hypertonic muscles.
The present study consists of two comparisons, 1) standard treatment in our clinic vs. additional HEALTHTRON, by observing the visual analogue scale (VAS) of stiffness in the neck and shoulder area and general condition, lymphocyte percentage in peripheral blood, blood pressure, and 2) HEALTHTRON alone vs. direct-contact electric stimulation (DCES) alone by observing circulatory blood in the trapezium, and the changes of autonomic nervous activity by heart rate variability (HRV). Results of the first research revealed that the stiffness in the neck and shoulder area was improved more quickly by additional HEALTHTRON than by the standard treatment, according to the results of VAS analysis. The general conditions were also improved in the patients treated with the additional HEALTHTRON. The lymphocyte percentage was increased by the addition HEALTHTRON, which suggested that parasympathetic nerve get a predominant position. The average blood pressure in the hypertensive patients in both groups was decreased after the treatment in this investigation, but blood pressure did not change in the patients with hypotension. The second research found that the blood circulation in the trapezium increased in each group treated with HEALTHTRON or DCES; however, the differences between two groups were not statistically significant. No changes in activity of the autonomic regulation were observed in the patients treated with DCES from an analysis of HRV. In contrast, the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems were activated by HEALTHTRON, according to HRV analysis. These results suggest that EFT (HEALTHTRON) are effective for treating stiffness in the neck and shoulder area, and improve the status of the autonomic nervous system.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most lethal type of gastrointestinal cancer, with a 5-year survival rate of 5%; it remains a significant, unresolved therapeutic challenge. Its aggressive features include insidious presentation, unresectability due to early involvement of major vessels, debilitating symptoms at the late stage and de novo chemoresistance. However, according to the Japan Pancreatic Cancer Registry, the 5-year survival of UICC Stages 0 and 1a are 85.8% and 68.7%, respectively. Early diagnosis plays an important role in improving the overall survival of patients with PDAC; therefore, efforts should focus on early diagnosis and the reliable identification of patients who will most likely benefit from major surgical intervention. Patients with risk factors, including family history, accompanying disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic pancreatitis and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), should be followed up for early detection of PDAC. In Japan, a national team has undertaken such surveillance of patients with IPMN. The protocol comprises a semi-annual follow up using various modalities to detect not only IPMN carcinoma, but also PDAC concomitant with IPMN. I will address this protocol in detail. The most accurate imaging technique for PDAC diagnosis and staging is considered to be contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). Whereas CT should be the first choice in patients with suspected PDAC, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the most accurate, particularly for detecting small lesions (< 10 mm). EUS combines the potential of endoscopy, which enables visualization of the mucosal surface of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, with ultrasonography. Thus, EUS is able to provide detailed, high-resolution images of the pancreas. However, whether a lesion is malignant or benign is unable to be discriminated solely from EUS imaging features. Obtaining samples from suspicious lesions or lymph nodes using EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA), offers the potential for cytological or histological diagnoses of pancreatic lesions with high sensitivity and specificity. Since accurate preoperative evaluation is essential to select the appropriate management strategy, the roles of EUS and EUS-FNA are crucial. Stage 0 PDAC (carcinoma in situ) has recently been discovered. This stage of PDAC is unable to be diagnosed using EUS-FNA, because EUS-FNA is only applicable after PDAC forms a cancerous mass (worse than stage1). Thus, diagnostic methods other than imaging require development. Presently, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) combined with cytology is able to detect Stage 0 PDAC, and in Japan, nasopancreatic drainage tubes have recently been used to collect pancreatic juice for cytodiagnosis. I would also like to introduce this method.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most lethal type of gastrointestinalcancer, with a 5-year survival rate of 5%; it remains a significant, unresolvedtherapeutic challenge. Its aggressive features include insidious presentation,unresectability due to early involvement of major vessels, debilitating symptomsat the late stage and de novo chemoresistance.However, according to the Japan Pancreatic Cancer Registry, the 5-year survivalof UICC Stages 0 and 1a are 85.8% and 68.7%, respectively.Early diagnosis plays an important role in improving the overall survival ofpatients with PDAC; therefore, efforts should focus on early diagnosis and thereliable identification of patients who will most likely benefit from major surgicalintervention.Patients with risk factors, including family history, accompanying disease,diabetes mellitus, chronic pancreatitis and intraductal papillary mucinousneoplasms (IPMN), should be followed up for early detection of PDAC. In Japan,a national team has undertaken such surveillance of patients with IPMN. Theprotocol comprises a semi-annual follow up using various modalities to detectnot only IPMN carcinoma, but also PDAC concomitant with IPMN. I will addressthis protocol in detail.The most accurate imaging technique for PDAC diagnosis and staging isconsidered to be contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). WhereasCT should be the first choice in patients with suspected PDAC, endoscopicultrasound (EUS) is the most accurate, particularly for detecting small lesions (<10 mm). EUS combines the potential of endoscopy, which enables visualizationof the mucosal surface of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, with ultrasonography.Thus, EUS is able to provide detailed, high-resolution images of the pancreas.However, whether a lesion is malignant or benign is unable to be discriminatedsolely from EUS imaging features. Obtaining samples from suspicious lesions orlymph nodes using EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA), offers the potentialfor cytological or histological diagnoses of pancreatic lesions with high sensitivityand specificity. Since accurate preoperative evaluation is essential to select theappropriate management strategy, the roles of EUS and EUS-FNA are crucial.Stage 0 PDAC (carcinoma in situ) has recently been discovered. This stage of PDACis unable to be diagnosed using EUS-FNA, because EUS-FNA is only applicableafter PDAC forms a cancerous mass (worse than stage1). Thus, diagnostic methodsother than imaging require development. Presently, endoscopic retrogradepancreatography (ERP) combined with cytology is able to detect Stage 0 PDAC,and in Japan, nasopancreatic drainage tubes have recently been used to collectpancreatic juice for cytodiagnosis. I would also like to introduce this method.

Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) procedures using the forward-viewing convex EUS (FV-EUS) have been reviewed based on the articles reported to date. The earliest reported procedure is the drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using FV-EUS. However, the study on drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts focused on showing that drainage is possible with FV-EUS rather than leveraging its features. Subsequently, studies describing the characteristics of FV-EUS have been reported. By using FV-EUS in EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy, double punctures in the gastrointestinal tract can be avoided. In postoperative modified anatomical cases, using the endoscopic function of FV-EUS, procedures such as bile duct drainage from anastomosis, pancreatic duct drainage from the afferent limb, and abscess drainage from the digestive tract have been reported. When a perpendicular puncture to the gastrointestinal tract is required or when there is a need to insert the endoscope deep into the gastrointestinal tract, FV-EUS is considered among the options.

Background/Aims: Non-invasive tissue sampling from the lower intra-abdominal and pelvic cavity is challenging. The role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in this situation is not well-established because of the limitations of the curved linear-array echoendoscopy-EUS for colonic insertion. The aim of this study was to report our institutional experience of transcolonic EUS-FNA using forward-viewing therapeutic linear echoendoscopy-EUS (FV-EUS) in combination with fluoroscopic guidance. Methods: Medical records of 13 patients who underwent transcolonic EUS-FNA of extracolonic lesions using FV-EUS in combination with fluoroscopic guidance at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan from June 2015 to November 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Using FV-EUS under fluoroscopic guidance, the FNA procedure could be performed successfully in all patients (100% technical success), with a median procedure time of 31 minutes. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA for detecting malignant lesions in this study were 91%, 100%, and 92%, respectively. There were no adverse events associated with the EUS-FNA procedure. Conclusions FV-EUS in combination with fluoroscopic guidance is an easy, safe, and effective technique for FNA of extracolonic lesions in the lower abdomen.

Anastomotic stricture (AS) is one of the complications of liver transplantation (LT) and can occur in up to 40% of living-donor LTs. Endoscopic management has become the first-line treatment of AS, and multiple plastic stents insertion has been mainly used in the past. Recently, many treatments utilizing fully covered self-expandable metal stents (cSEMSs) have been attempted, and results showing adequate treatment outcome have been reported. In this review, we look into the treatment performance and cautionary steps needed when using cSEMS as a treatment for AS.

In the palliative setting, the necessity of biliary drainage of both liver lobes for malignant hilar biliary obstruction remains controversial. However, bilateral biliary drainage is a reasonable option to prevent cholangitis of the undrained lobe and to preserve liver function during the course of chemotherapy. Bilateral biliary drainage can be accomplished by the percutaneous or endoscopic placement of multiple self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS). Although SEMS placement via bilateral (multiple) percutaneous routes is technically simple, multiple percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) may lead to additional morbidity. SEMS placement via a single percutaneous route is a useful method; however, negotiation of a guidewire into the contralateral bile duct is occasionally impossible if the hilar angle between the right hepatic duct and left hepatic duct is acute. Percutaneous dual SEMS placement is generally performed using the stent-in-stent technique (T configuration or Y configuration) or the side-by-side technique. In addition, the crisscross technique has been reported as being a useful method for trisegmental drainage. The side-to-end technique is also useful for multiple SEMS placement. In the future, the combination of percutaneous intervention and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided procedures may be effective in the management of malignant hilar biliary obstruction.
Bile Ducts ; Biliary Tract Neoplasms ; Cholangitis ; Drainage ; Drug Therapy ; Hepatic Duct, Common ; Liver ; Methods ; Negotiating ; Stents*

Background: The WHO classified pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN) in 2010 as G1, G2, and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), according to Ki67 labeling index (LI). However, the clinical behavior of NEC is still not fully studied. We aimed to clarify the clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of NECs. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics, KRAS mutation status, treatment response, and the overall survival of eleven pNEC patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2014 according to the WHO 2010. We subclassified WHO-NECs into well-differentiated (WDNEC) and poorlydifferentiated NEC (PDNEC), the latter further subdivided into large and small cell type. Results: The median Ki67 LI was 69.1% (range, 40% - 95%) and the median tumor size was 35 mm. 11 WHO-NECs were subclassified 4 WDNEC and 7 PDNEC, and further separated PDNEC into 3 large cell and 4 small cell subtypes. Comparisons of WDNEC vs. PDNEC revealed hypervascularity on CT, 50% (2/4) vs. 0% (0/7) (P = 0.109); median Ki67 LI, 46.3% (40% - 53%) vs. 85% (54% - 95%) (P = 0.001); KRAS mutations, 0% (0/4) vs. 85.7% (6/7) (P = 0.015); response rates to platinum-based chemotherapy, 0% (0/2) vs.100% (4/4) (P = 0.067) and median survival, 227 vs. 186 days (P = 0.227). Conclusions: The WHO-NEC category may be composed of heterogeneous disease entities, namely WDNEC and PDNEC. These subgroups tended to exhibit differing Ki67 and KRAS mutation profiles, and distinct response to chemotherapy. Further studies for the re-evaluation of the current WHO 2010 classification is warranted.

Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy is an endoscopic technique that enables in vivo histological evaluation using fluorescent pigment. The ability to diagnostically differentiate between benign and malignant biliary disease using the “CholangioFlexTM”, a dedicated biliary device, has been reported. However, the Miami and Paris classifications, used as diagnostic criteria, mainly evaluate findings in the submucosa, and visualizing the epithelium as the main site of lesions remains difficult. To address this problem, we verified the imaging findings and diagnostic ability of three types of probes: CholangioFlexTM, GastroFlexTM, and AlveoFlexTM. With GastroFlexTM, the clear mucosal epithelium was observed, and differential diagnoses as benign/malignant could be made based on epithelial findings. GastroFlexTM may be a good first-choice probe for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy of biliary diseases, and a new diagnostic classification based on bile duct epithelial findings may provide useful criteria independent of the Miami or Paris classifications.