1.A Proposal on the Curriculum of Behavioral Science
Marie Amitani ; Yoshiki Ishikawa ; Akio Inui ; Shigeru Inoue ; Akihito Shimazu ; Shigeki Suwa ; Akira Tsuda ; Akizumi Tsutsumi ; Koji Tsuboi ; Mutsuhiro Nakao ; Takeo Nakayama ; Masahiro Hashizume ; Kazuhiro Yoshiuchi
Medical Education 2015;46(1):37-40
Introduction: No formal curriculum has been formulated for teaching behavioral science to undergraduate medical students in Japan.
Method: We conducted a survey using the Delphi method to investigate the required competency in behavioral science for graduates in medicine. Then, we developed an outcome-oriented curriculum for teaching behavioral science.
Results: We propose an educational module of behavioral science consisting of 15 sessions of 90-minute lectures, small group discussions, and practice.
Discussion: We recommend including not only lectures but also practices according to problem-based learning as well as team-based learning in the curriculum to achieve the target outcome.
2.Terminal Anguish among Delirious Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study
Natsuki KAWASHIMA ; Takayuki HISANAGA ; Jun HAMANO ; Isseki MAEDA ; Kengo IMAI ; Akihiro SAKASHITA ; Yoshihisa MATSUMOTO ; Keiichi UEMURA ; Takuya ODAGIRI ; Asao OGAWA ; Kazuhiro YOSHIUCHI ; Satoru IWASE
Palliative Care Research 2019;14(3):237-243
Objective: This study aimed to reveal the prevalence and characteristics of anguish among delirious patients with advanced cancer receiving specialized palliative care services. Methods: We conducted a subanalysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational study at 14 inpatient palliative care units and 10 general wards that offered psycho-oncology consultation service in Japan. We consecutively enrolled the patients with advanced cancer who were diagnosed with delirium and prescribed antipsychotics. Palliative care specialists decided whether patients suffered from anguish or not. We assessed patients’ background and severity of delirium with the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised (DRS-R-98). Results: Of 818 enrolled patients, 99 (12.1%) suffered from anguish. We observed a significant difference in the mean age (68.9±12.6 vs. 72.1±11.2, p=0.009), prevalence of dementia (2% vs. 10.4%, p=0.005) between patients with anguish and those without anguish. Patients with anguish had lower DRS-R-98 total scores before medication than those without anguish (15.3±8.1 vs. 17.3±7.8, p=0.018), but higher severity score in lability of affect (1.2±0.8 vs 1.0±0.9, p=0.023). Conclusions: The results of this study suggested that patients with anguish tend to be younger, mostly do not have dementia, and have lower delirium severity score but higher score in lability of affect. Nevertheless, further research, investigating appropriate evaluations and medical interventions for patients with anguish is warranted.