Objective: Macrolide therapy has been recommended as an effective treatment for pediatric otolaryngology patients with conditions such as chronic sinusitis and otitis media with effusion.  However, in many cases, a relapse may occur after cessation of treatment.  Therefore, patients are compelled to continue taking antibiotics.  In this paper, we examined the relationship between the duration of therapy and period to relapse on the basis of prescription information and literature research.
Methods: To evaluate the therapeutic doses, we investigated the clinical doses of erythromycin and clarithromycin used for pediatric patients in a community pharmacy from January 2009 to July 2009.  Further, we performed literature searches on the doses of both drugs using Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi databases (from 1983 to 2011) and compared the data obtained with the clinical doses.  Accordingly, the oral doses of macrolides were classified as a low dose or normal dose.  We analyzed the relationship between the administration period and the cessation period, which was defined as the period from the cessation of the treatment to relapse.
Results: Review of the 17 selected reports and the clinical doses showed that the maximum dose of erythromycin was 15 mg/kg/day and that of clarithromycin was 8 mg/kg/day during therapy.  When both cephem or penicillin antibiotics and low-dose macrolides were taken continuously during the administration period, a weak correlation was observed between the administration period and the cessation period.
Conclusion: These results may be useful for the appropriate use of antibiotics and for preventing relapse in pediatric otolaryngology patients.

Objective: In this study, we evaluated the change in degree of recognition and understanding of palliative care as pharmacy students’ years advanced.
Methods: A questionnaire survey consisting of 11 items about recognition of narcotics and 27 items about understanding of palliative care was conducted with first- to fifth-year pharmacy students.  We divided the questions about the image of narcotics into groups and classified the questions about their knowledge of palliative care into the categories based on some reports.
Results: Among the three groups of questions about the image of narcotics, the degree of “right recognition of narcotics” increased, and those of “wrong recognition of narcotics” and “sense of resistance to narcotics” decreased as pharmacy students’ years advanced.  Additionally, questions about their knowledge of palliative care were categorized into three: “basic guidelines for cancer pain relief and methods of narcotic use,” “role of pharmacists in palliative care and support for patients,” and “pharmacologic characteristics of narcotics.”  Their degree of understanding of each category increased with an increase in years.  Both the recognition of narcotics and understanding of palliative care changed in the fourth- and fifth-grade year students compared to the first-, second-, and third-year ones.
Conclusion: These results suggest that the recognition and understanding of palliative care changed along the same trends as pharmacy students’ years advanced.  Therefore, it is important that pharmacy students acquire appropriate knowledge to play an active role in palliative care.