Objective To explore the early-term efficacy of porous titanium trabecular metal acetabular (TTM) compo-nents produced by E-beam technology in total hip arthroplasty(THA). Methods From May 2012 to JUN 2013, nineteen primary THA patients (20 hips) were devided into observation group of porous TTM acetabular prosthesis produced by E-beam technology and control group of Pinnacle acetabular prosthesis. TTM group had nine patients (10 hips), including 7 males and 2 females, with the mean age of 61.0 years. Pinnacle group had ten patients (10 hips), including 6 males and 4 females, with the mean age of 58.6 years. The patients were followed up at the 6,12,24 weeks after operation. X-rays were taken at the follow-ups. Acetabular compo-nent stability and osseointegration were assessed through radiograph. Harris scores system,SF-36 Heath Survey Questionnaire and WOMAC Osteoarthritis index were recorded before and after operation to evaluate clinical effects of surgery. Results In TTM group, the Harris score improved from 48.2 ± 5.5 preoperatively to 89.5 ± 4.0 postoperatively, SF-36 scores from 329.1 ± 86.7 to 763.8 ± 15.1, and WOMAC index from 18.8 ± 11.0 to 1.3 ± 0.9. No cases suffered aseptic loosening and migration. After 24 weeks, There was no significant difference regarding Harris scores system,SF-36 Heath Survey Questionnaire and WOMAC Os-teoarthritis index between two groups. In TTM group, two hips had a radiolucent line postoperatively, which occurred in 2 and 3 zone. The lines were disappeared 24 weeks later. Conclusion In THA, the initial stability of TTM produced by E-beam tech-nology was fine, which can facilitate bone ingrowth in early stage. However, the long-term follow-up effect still needs to be con-firmed.

Objective:Healthy life expectancy (HLE), which combines life expectancy with health, is an essential comprehensive measure of life length and quality. This article aimed to systematically review the methods for defining and measuring HLE and describe application studies published, providing a reference for decision makers to select and develop methods suitable for China's conditions to measure HLE.Methods:Seven Chinese and English literature databases were searched up to May 7, 2022, and several related reviews and bibliography were manually retrieved. Systematic reviews and empirical research were included concerning HLE indicators and measurement of HLE. Information including the study area, type of the study, study population, HLE index, measurement method, data sources, and results from application studies published in the last five years were extracted. The evolution of the definition of HLE, the scope of different indicators, the measurement scale of health, and measurement methods, were all collected. Results of the empirical research related to measurement methods of indicators were summarized. The study followed the scoping review framework and was written according to the PRISMA-ScR statement.Results:A total of 84 articles were included, including 13 reviews, 17 original studies related to HLE index definition, ten original studies related to index measurement, and 44 empirical studies conducted in the past five years. There were as many as 20 indicators related to HLE, and each scale had its emphasis. A total of ten methods measuring HLE were identified, which vary in the definition of health, whether using weight, and the data type. The most commonly used indicators in the past five years were disability-free life expectancy and HLE. For the method of HLE calculation, Sullivan's method was mainly used for cross-sectional data, and the multistate life table was mainly used for longitudinal data.Conclusions:There are various definitions and measurement methods of HLE, but none are suitable for all scenarios. To summarize the HLE concept, health evaluation techniques, measurement methods, and application studies published worldwide can provide a reference for the localization of HLE measurement in China.