Background & Purpose : For cancer patients and survivors, some rehabilitation seems to be required in order for them to function properly and to maintain their ADL and QOL. To improve outcomes, the subject of cancer rehabilitation in our hospital, one of Japan's regional centers for cancer treatment, was examined. Methods:Our section met 246 patients who were admitted to our hospital for cancer treatment from April, 2008 to March, 2010. We assessed their age, cancer origin, disability, the term between admission, operation and consultation, the period of hospitalization and rehabilitation, and the outcome. Results:Most patients had some deficits due to their cancer, which included neurological defects, bone and joint troubles, especially bone metastasis, or dysphasia. “Disuse syndrome” was found in 101 patients who had been lying in bed without these deficits. Owing to their treatment, 139 patients were discharged home with some functional inconvenience. Their length of stay in our hospital was suggested to be shortened by early consultation with our section (R=0.84). Despite their efforts, 90 patients died. They enrolled in some program for an average of 56.4±6.3 days, and continued their rehabilitation for 7.6±1.2 days on average before their deaths. Conclusion:Patients who are suffering from cancer need rehabilitation in all stages of their disease, which are preventive, restorative, supportive and palliative. Both in a hospital setting and in community-based medicine, a better rehabilitation system is required for most cancer patients, not only the survivors, especially those falling into “disuse syndrome” unnecessarily, but also terminally ill patients.

Objective: This study aimed to clarify the details of inpatient cancer rehabilitation interventions provided by designated cancer hospitals in Japan. Methods: This questionnaire-based survey asked specialists regarding the outline of their facilities’ inpatient cancer rehabilitation, Dietz classification, disease, and intervention details. Results: Restorative interventions were the most common, and the most common cancer was lung cancer followed by colorectal cancer; hematologic malignancy; gastric cancer; and liver, gallbladder, and pancreatic cancer. Intervention proportions for colorectal and gastric cancer were significantly higher in general hospitals than in university hospitals and cancer centers; in contrast, those for hematological malignancy were significantly higher in university hospitals than in general hospitals. For bone and soft tissue sarcomas, intervention proportions in cancer centers were significantly higher than those in university and general hospitals; and for oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers, they were significantly higher in university hospitals and cancer centers than in general hospitals. The most common intervention was walking training, followed by resistance training, basic motor training, activities of daily living training, and respiratory rehabilitation. Respiratory rehabilitation was performed significantly more frequently in university and general hospitals than in cancer centers.Conclusion: The diseases had differed according to the characteristics of the facilities, and the interventions were considered accordingly. In future, it will be necessary to verify the effectiveness of inpatient cancer rehabilitation according to facility characteristics and to disseminate information on inpatient cancer rehabilitation.