Several M-CAT elements are present in the chicken nicotinic acetylcholine receptor γ-subunit promoter and required for the totipotency of this gene.To understand the binding properties of M-CAT element,the interaction of M-CAT motif,at the position -67/-61 relative to the initiation site of γ-promoter with nuclear proteins,were analyzed.Mutageneses and binding experiments demonstrated that the M-CAT core motif bound nuclear protein (s) from tested chicken tissues to generate a high-mobility complex;while the flanking sequence bound different factors to generate lower-mobility complexes with the exception of liver.Southwestern blotting showed that only a 30 kD protein was expressed in tested tissues of chicken embryo at day 13.These results suggest that a 30 kD factor can directly bind to M-CAT element in the manner of monomer,even homodimer and is ubiquitously expressed in tissues,while the binding of the factor(s) to flanking sequence should probably rely on the presence of a 30 kD ubiquitous factor.

Purpose To evaluate the correlation and consistency of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) obtained by ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GMPS) using four formulae (R0-R3) of ECToolbox software and findings on equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA), and to determine the optimal diagnostic thresholds by using the four formulae. Materials and Methods A total of 38 patients with myocardial infarction and 65 patients with suspected coronary heart disease underwent both 99Tcm-MIBI rest GMPS and 99Tcm-RBC ERNA within a week. The LVEF values calculated by ECToolbox R0, R1, R2 and R3 were compared with those obtained by ERNA, and compared with ERNA results, the optimal diagnostic thresholds of the four formulae (R0-R3) were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results The results calculated by the formulae (R0-R3) presented a significant positive correlation with that obtained by ERNA [mean LVEF value by ERNA (54.6±17.5)%, mean LVEF value by formulae R0-R3 (64.1±15.7)%, (56.3±15.1)%, (69.9±17.9)% and (56.7±13.6)%, respectively, r=0.899, 0.898, 0.890, 0.895; P<0.01]. All mean LVEF values calculated by the four formulae were higher than that by ERNA, and the difference was significant (P<0.05). LVEF≥50%obtained by ERNA was considered as normal diagnostic value, the optimal diagnostic thresholds of R0-R3 were 56.5%, 51.5%, 64.5% and 52.5%, respectively. Conclusion The results calculated by R0, R1, R2 and R3 in the ECToolbox software and that by ERNA show significant correlation and difference for the assessment of LVEF. Thus it is advisable to stick to one formula in the follow-up of each patient and select correspondent threshold in the clinical diagnosis.

Objective: To compare effects of sulindac, PPAR? activator and PPAR? antagonist on the proliferation and apoptosis of the colonic cancer cells, and to investigate whether sulindac exerts its colonic neoplasm inhibiting activity through pathway of PPAR?. Methods: Cell strain HT-29 of colonic cancer was divided into six groups: the control group, sulindac group, 15d-PGJ2 (PPAR? activator) group, GW9662 (PPAR? antagonist) group, sulindac+GW9662 group and 15d-PGJ2+ GW9662 group. After 24 and 48 hours’culturing, proliferation status of each group was determined by immunocytochemical staining of PCNA, and cell apoptosis status was determined by double staining method of AnnexinV-FITC/PI, examined on flow cytometer. Results: (1) Proliferation status of the colonic cancer cells of each group: 24 and 48 hours after medication, PCNA positive ratios were 33.2%?4.5% and 25.0%?4.7% of the control group, 11.8%?3.7% and 8.6%?1.9% of sulindac group, 11.2%?2.5% and 11.4%?2.1% of 15d-PGJ2 group, 35.3%?4.3% and 26.8%?3.9% of GW9662 group, 16.5%?5.3% and 12.2 %?2.4% of sulindac + GW9662 group, 21.0%?4.8% and 21.5%?4.2% of 15d-PGJ2+GW9662 group. (2) Apoptosis ratio of colonic cancer cells of each group: 24 hours after medication, apoptosis rate of colonic cancer cells was 13.0%?1.0% of the control group, 41.0%? 2.6% of sulindac group, 11.5%?0.6% of 15d-PGJ2 group, 12.4%?0.9% of GW9662 group, 33.6%?2.3% of sulindac+GW9662 group, and 13.0%?1.0% of 15d-PGJ2 + GW9662 group. 48 hours after medication, apoptosis rate was 14.0%?3.4% of the control group, 95.3%?1.5% of sulindac group, 31.5%?2.3% of 15d-PGJ2 group, 13.0%?1.9% of GW9662 group, 86.8%?0.4% of sulindac+GW9662 group, and 12.9%?1.0% of 15d-PGJ2+GW9662 group. Conclusion: Both sulindac and PPAR? activator can inhibit proliferation and promote apoptosis of colonic cancer cells, and their effects can be antagonized by PPAR? antagonist, which indicates that as a kind of PPAR? ligand, sulindac can inhibit proliferation of colonic cancer cells via activating PPAR?.

In order to understand the current status of the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) about prevention and control of COVID -19 in college students, and to provide theoretical basis for prevention and control work in college campus. This study investigated the KAP of COVID -19 of 1 847 college students in Shaanxi province by questionnaire using the convenience sampling method. Chisquare test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the influencing factors for the KAP of COVID -19. The results demonstrated that 48.3% of the students had a higher knowledge level of COVID -19, 11.7% had a fear attitude and 39.6% had good protective practices. Logistic regression results showed that female and urban household college students had higher cognitive level of COVID -19. The college students with anxiety state were more likely to have fear attitude. Students of female, urban household, anxiety, higher cognition and fear attitude showed better protective practices. The above results indicated that the knowledge level of COVID -19 in college students are not enough, and the attitude and protective practices need to be further improved. Therefore, relevant departments should follow the rules of KAP, carry out targeted propaganda and education on COVID -19 for college students, to improve their ability to cope with public health emergencies.

In order to understand the current status of the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) about prevention and control of COVID -19 in college students, and to provide theoretical basis for prevention and control work in college campus. This study investigated the KAP of COVID -19 of 1 847 college students in Shaanxi province by questionnaire using the convenience sampling method. Chisquare test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the influencing factors for the KAP of COVID -19. The results demonstrated that 48.3% of the students had a higher knowledge level of COVID -19, 11.7% had a fear attitude and 39.6% had good protective practices. Logistic regression results showed that female and urban household college students had higher cognitive level of COVID -19. The college students with anxiety state were more likely to have fear attitude. Students of female, urban household, anxiety, higher cognition and fear attitude showed better protective practices. The above results indicated that the knowledge level of COVID -19 in college students are not enough, and the attitude and protective practices need to be further improved. Therefore, relevant departments should follow the rules of KAP, carry out targeted propaganda and education on COVID -19 for college students, to improve their ability to cope with public health emergencies.