Objective To explore the operation opportunity of cholecystectomy for senile patients with acute cholecystitis combined with underlying disease.Methods 82 elderly patients with acute cholecystitis complicated with underlying diseases underwent cholecystectomy were selected,they were divided into two groups according to the different operation time:the early operation group and the delayed operation group,41 cases in each group.The patients in early operation group were given operation in 72h,while the delayed operation group was given operation more than 72h after attack.The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,intraoperative tissue adhesions,intraoperative exudation,hospitalization time,cost of hospitalization and complications of the two groups were observed and com-pared.Results The operation time of the two groups were (45.32 ±1 2.23)min,(50.89 ±1 3.34)min,there was no significant difference (P >0.05),the intraoperative tissue adhesions of the delayed operation group was more than the early operation group,and the intraoperative hemorrhage and exudation in the early operation group were significantly higher than those of the delayed operation group (P <0.05),and the hospital stay and cost of hospitalization were sig-nificantly lower than those of the delayed operation group (P <0.05).1 case in the early operation group occurred pulmonary infection,3 cases with incision infection,the incidence of complications was 9.76%;1 case in the delayed operation group underwent laparotomy operation,2 cases in the delayed operation group had pulmonary infection,inci-sion infection in 4 cases,the incidence rate of complication was 1 4.63%,there was no significant difference between the two groups (P >0.05).Conclusion The optimal operation timing of acute cholecystitis combined with basic dis-eases in the elderly patients underwent cholecystectomy is within 72h.For patients who can not be immediately given operation due to various reasons,delayed cholecystectomy is safe and feasible.

Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of endoscope and laparoscope in treatment of acutebiliary pancreatitis.Methods 84 patients with acute biliary pancreatitis from January 2010 to January 2014 in our hospital during treatment were randomly divided into the study group and control group according to the random num-ber table methods,42 cases in each group.The control group was treated with conservative treatment of department of internal medicine,while the study group was treated with duodenoscopy combined with laparoscopy.To observe and compare the efficacy and adverse reactions of two groups.Results Temperature returned to normal time,abdominal pain relief time,recovery time of amylase in urine,recovery time of biochemical index,hospitalization time and cost of hospitalization of the study group after treatment were (3.44 ±1.63)d,(4.73 ±1.12)d,(7.82 ±3.31)d,(9.81 ± 6.42)d,(12.43 ±4.61 )d,which were significantly lower than (5.94 ±2.43)d,(7.53 ±2.12)d,(11.72 ± 2.21)d,(18.41 ±8.62)d,(20.33 ±6.21)d of the control group(t =3.90,4.02,4.26,4.50,5.01,all P <0.05). 2 cases of the study group occured biliary tract bleeding,2 cases with pancreatic pseudocyst,1 case with wound infec-tion,there was no recurrence,the incidence rate of adverse reaction was 11.90%;3 cases of the control group after treatment occurred pancreatic pseudocyst,2 cases with abdominal cysts,5 cases with recurrence,1 case with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS),1 case with renal failure,the incidence rate of adverse reactions was 28.57%, which of the control group was significantly higher than the study group (χ2 =4.21,P <0.05 ).Conclusion Duodenal endoscopy combined with laparoscopy has good clinical effect,shorter hospitalization time,less cost,less adverse reaction and the recurrence rate is low in treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis,which has high application value.