1.Knowledge, attitudes and practices of surgical trainees and trainers on recommended Surgical Site Infection prevention protocols
Esther A. Saguil ; Jose Modesto B. Abellera III ; Daniel Ernest L. Florendo ; George Robert L. Uyquienco
Philippine Journal of Surgical Specialties 2024;79(2):59-74
RATIONALE/OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to determine the knowledge, attitudes and practices of surgeons and surgical trainees regarding published SSI prevention guidelines. Specifically, the study described knowledge and attitudes towards SSI prevention guidelines among members of surgical training programs, described preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative practices in SSI prevention and identified the presence of surgical site infection surveillance programs among various institutions.
METHODSThis was a retrospective cross-sectional study that evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of surgeons and surgical trainees to published SSI prevention guidelines in the Philippines. It utilized existing data from an October 2022 online survey done by the Philippine College of Surgeons distributed to various surgical training institutions in the country.
RESULTSThere were a total of 213 respondents. The different attitudes and knowledge gaps towards present SSI prevention guidelines are described.
CONCLUSIONDespite the existence of local and international guidelines there still appears to be a significant lack of awareness and variability in practice among the different institutions as well as with surgeons of different levels of expertise or training. Varying preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative practices have also been described, including evident deviations from SSI guidelines. Lastly, there is a lack of standardized SSI surveillance programs among institutions and these are not aligned towards improved patient safety and quality improvement.
Human ; Surgical Wound Infection
2.The Philippine College of Surgeons evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on preoperative evaluation of ASA I and II adult patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery.
Alfred Philip O. De Dios ; Andrei Cesar S. Abella ; Leonardo O. Ona III ; Maria Cheryl L. Cucueco ; Joy Grace G. Jerusalem ; Jose Modesto B. Abellera III ; Jesus Fernando B. Inciong ; Ma. Luisa D. Aquino
Philippine Journal of Surgical Specialties 2017;72(2):39-51
It is the practice in most health care institutions in our country to have patients for elective surgery evaluated pre-operatively by Internists and Anesthesiologists. Practitioners don’t seem to agree on how this is to be carried out. Each institution has its own protocol and even individual physicians have their own preference, which they have learned either during their training or from experience.
Physicians usually request for preoperative tests for patients undergoing elective surgery in order to minimize risk, and to serve as a baseline to detect subsequent changes. Several authors agree to this as the goal of pre-operative evaluation. This is being done to identify risk factors and to screen broadly for undiagnosed disease. Undiagnosed clinical conditions are correlated with the risk of complications during the perioperative period. This then allows the physician to identify patients with increased risk of morbidity and mortality, and to help them design preoperative strategies that can reduce these risks. These tests can be helpful to stratify risk and guide postoperative management; however, most of them are obtained because of protocol rather than medical necessity.
Majority of surgeries performed are non-cardiac in nature. Mortality rates for these procedures can be as high as 4% depending on the patient’s risk and type of surgery. Cardiovascular complications account for half of all morbidities and mortalities in the perioperative period for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
Human
;
Male
;
Female
;
Adult
;
Elective Surgical Procedures
;
Preoperative Care
;
Surgeons
;
Universities